Article Data

  • Views 926
  • Dowloads 156

Original Research

Open Access

ARID1A and GPR30 expression patterns characterize the different histological subtypes of endometrial carcinoma

  • Wiktor Szewczuk1
  • Oksana Szewczuk2
  • Krzysztof Czajkowski2
  • Barbara Górnicka3
  • Barbara Górnicka3
  • Andrzej Semczuk4,*,

1Department of Pathology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland

22nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warsaw Medical University, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland

3Department of Pathology, Warsaw Medical University, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland

42nd Department of Gynecology, Lublin Medical University, 20-954 Lublin, Poland

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4206166 Vol.42,Issue 6,December 2021 pp.1138-1145

Submitted: 12 October 2021 Accepted: 16 November 2021

Published: 15 December 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Andrzej Semczuk E-mail: andrzej.semczuk@umlub.pl

Abstract

Objectives: It is of utmost importance to investigate the newly discovered immunohistochemical proteins that are helpful in differentiating various histological subtypes of endometrial carcinomas (ECs). In this study, we aimed to compare the localization and expression profile of selected proteins (ARID1A, nidogen 2 (NID2), LRH-1, and GPR30) in 60 early-staged (I and II) G2/G3 ECs with different histological subtypes. Methods: Endometrioid-type (n = 20), serous (n = 20), and clear-cell (n = 20) ECs were immunohistochemically stained applying the anti-ARID1A, -NID2, -LRH-1, and -GPR30 antibodies. Normal endometrial samples (n = 8) were selected as a control group. Results: In general, 95% (19 out of 20) and 100% (20 out of 20) of endometrioid and serous samples revealed moderately/intense cytoplasmic/nuclear ARID1A immune-positivity, while only four out of 20 (20%) clear-cell carcinomas showed moderate staining. A significant difference in ARID1A expression was noted between different histological subtypes of ECs (clear-cell cancer vs endometrioid cancer, p < 0.001, and clear-cell cancer vs serous cancer, p < 0.001). Cytoplasmic NID2 staining did not differ significantly between histological subtypes. Most of the endometrioid (19/20; 95%) and serous (19/20, 95%) neoplasms revealed intense cytoplasmic LRH1-immunopositivity. Weak/moderate GPR30 cytoplasmic reactivity was detected in 16 out of 20 (80%) endometrioid EC, however, this protein was neither noted in clear-cell and serous neoplasms nor normal endometria. Differences in GPR30 immunoreactivity between endometrioid cancer and serous/clear-cell cancer were of significant values (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Weak ARID1A expression may be associated with gene alterations in selected EC histological subtypes. GPR30 staining may help to differentiate various histological EC subtypes.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Immunohistochemistry; ARID1A; Nidogen 2; LRH-1; GPR30

Cite and Share

Wiktor Szewczuk,Oksana Szewczuk,Krzysztof Czajkowski,Barbara Górnicka,Barbara Górnicka,Andrzej Semczuk. ARID1A and GPR30 expression patterns characterize the different histological subtypes of endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(6);1138-1145.

References

[1] Makker V, Green AK, Wenham RM, Mutch D, Davidson B, Miller DS. New therapies for advanced, recurrent, and metastatic endometrial cancers. Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice. 2017; 4: 19.

[2] Amant F, Mirza MR, Koskas M, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2018; 143: 37–50.

[3] Didkowska J, Wojciechowska U, Czaderny K, Olasek P, Ciuba A. Cancer in Poland in 2017 (In Polish). 2019. Available at: http://onkologia.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/Nowotwory_2017.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

[4] Gałczyński K, Nowakowski Ł, Rechberger T, Semczuk A. Should we be more aware of endometrial cancer in adolescents? Devel- opmental Period Medicine. 2016; 20: 169–173.

[5] Farkas SA, Sorbe BG, Nilsson TK. Epigenetic changes as prognostic predictors in endometrial carcinomas. Epigenetics. 2017; 12: 19–26.

[6] Markowska A, Szarszewska M, Żurawski J, Sajdak S, Knapp P, Gryboś A, et al. Studies on selected molecular factors in endometrial cancers. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2018; 27: 1417–1424.

[7] Takeda T, Banno K, Okawa R, Yanokura M, Iijima M, Irie-Kunitomi H, et al. ARID1a gene mutation in ovarian and endometrial cancers (Review). Oncology Reports. 2016; 35: 607–613.

[8] Khalique S, Naidoo K, Attygalle AD, Kriplani D, Daley F, Lowe A, et al. Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers. Journal of Clinical Pathology - Clinical Molecular Pathology. 2018; 4: 154–166.

[9] Zhang ZM, Xiao S, Sun GY, Liu Y, Zhang FH, Yang HF, et al. The clinicopathologic significance of the loss of BAF250a (ARID1A) expression in endometrial carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014; 24: 534–540.

[10] Liu G, Xu P, Fu Z, Hua X, Liu X, Li W, et al. Prognostic and clin- icopathological significance of ARID1a in endometrium-related gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2017; 118: 4517–4525.

[11] Toumpeki C, Liberis A, Tsirkas I, Tsirka T, Kalagasidou S, Inag- amova L, et al. The Role of ARID1A in endometrial cancer and the molecular pathways associated with pathogenesis and cancer progression. In Vivo. 2019; 33: 659–667.

[12] Ayaz D, Diniz G, Sayhan S, Kaya O, Kahraman DS, Karadeniz T, et al. The clinicopathologic significance of the ARID1A expression in ovarian epithelial tumors. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019; 40: 567–571.

[13] Ekblom P, Ekblom M, Fecker L, Klein G, Zhang HY, Kadoya Y, et al. Role of mesenchymal nidogen for epithelial morphogenesis in vitro. Development. 1994; 120: 2003–2014.

[14] Kohfeldt E, Sasaki T, Göhring W, Timpl R. Nidogen-2: a new basement membrane protein with diverse binding properties. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1998; 282: 99–109.

[15] Erickson AC, Couchman JR. Still more complexity in mammalian basement membranes. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2000; 48: 1291–1306.

[16] Ulazzi L, Sabbioni S, Miotto E, Veronese A, Angusti A, Gafà R, et al. Nidogen 1 and 2 gene promoters are aberrantly methylated in human gastrointestinal cancer. Molecular Cancer. 2007; 6: 17.

[17] Mokkapati S, Bechtel M, Reibetanz M, Miosge N, Nischt R. Ab- sence of the basement membrane component nidogen 2, but not of nidogen 1, results in increased lung metastasis in mice. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2012; 60: 280–289.

[18] Chai AWY, Cheung AKL, Dai W, Ko JMY, Ip JCY, Chan KW, et al. Metastasis-suppressing NID2, an epigenetically-silenced gene, in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 78859–78871.

[19] Cheng ZX, Huang XH, Wang Q, Chen JS, Zhang LJ, Chen XL. Clinical significance of decreased nidogen-2 expression in the tumor tissue and serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012; 105: 71–80.

[20] Lin Q, Aihara A, Chung W, Li Y, Huang Z, Chen X, et al. LRH1 as a driving factor in pancreatic cancer growth. Cancer Letters. 2014; 345: 85–90.

[21] Nadolny C, Dong X. Liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1): a potential therapeutic target for cancer. Cancer Biology and Therapy. 2015; 16: 997–1004.

[22] Wu C, Feng J, Li L, Wu Y, Xie H, Yin Y, et al. Liver receptor homologue 1, a novel prognostic marker in colon cancer patients. Oncology Letters. 2018; 16: 2833–2838.

[23] Lin Q, Aihara A, Chung W, Li Y, Chen X, Huang Z, et al. LRH1 promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis. Cancer Letters. 2014; 350: 15–24.

[24] Liu Y, Xing Y, Wang H, Yan S, Wang X, Cai L. LRH1 as a promis- ing prognostic biomarker and predictor of metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thoracic Cancer. 2018; 9: 1725–1732.

[25] Dubé C, Bergeron F, Vaillant M, Robert NM, Brousseau C, Tremblay JJ. The nuclear receptors SF1 and LRH1 are expressed in endometrial cancer cells and regulate steroidogenic gene transcription by cooperating with AP-1 factors. Cancer Letters. 2009; 275: 127–138.

[26] Cygankiewicz AI, Jacenik D, Krajewska WM. GPER receptor - the new player in estrogen signaling. Process Biochemistry. 2015; 61: 52–60. (In Polish)

[27] Liu Y, An S, Ward R, Yang Y, Guo X, Li W, et al. G protein-coupled receptors as promising cancer targets. Cancer Letters. 2016; 376: 226–239.

[28] Prossnitz ER, Arterburn JB, Sklar LA. GPR30: AG protein-coupled receptor for estrogen. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinol- ogy. 2007; 265: 138–142.

[29] Kvingedal AM, Smeland EB. A novel putative G-protein-coupled receptor expressed in lung, heart and lymphoid tissue. FEBS Letters. 1997; 407: 59–62.

[30] Smith HO, Leslie KK, Singh M, Qualls CR, Revankar CM, Joste NE, et al. GPR30: a novel indicator of poor survival for endometrial carcinoma. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007; 196: 386.e1–386.11.

[31] Zhu CX, Xiong W, Wang ML, Yang J, Shi HJ, Chen HQ, et al. Nuclear G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPR30) predicts poor survival in patients with ovarian cancer. The Journal of In- ternational Medical Research. 2018; 46: 723–731.

[32] Friese K, Kost B, Vattai A, Marmé F, Kuhn C, Mahner S, et al. The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER/GPR30) may serve as a prognostic marker in early-stage cervical cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2018; 144: 13–19.

[33] Filardo EJ, Graeber CT, Quinn JA, Resnick MB, Giri D, DeLel- lis RA, et al. Distribution of GPR30, a seven membrane-spanning estrogen receptor, in primary breast cancer and its association with clinicopathologic determinants of tumor progression. Clinical Cancer Research. 2006; 12: 6359–6366.

[34] Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009; 105: 103–104.

[35] Scully RF, Bonfiglio TA, Kurman RJ, Silverberg SG, Wilkinson E. WHO International Classification of Tumors: Histological typing of female genital tract tumours. 1994. Available at: https://link.spr inger.com.book/10.1007/978-3-642-85014-1 (Accessed: 30 June 1994).

[36] Semczuk A, Tomaszewski J, Gogacz M, Obrzut B, Rigau M, Lewkowicz D, et al. Well-differentiated mucinous uterine adenocarcinoma predominantly diagnosed as adenoma malignum: a case report with an immunohistochemical analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2015; 8: 7600–7604.

[37] Szewczuk W, Szewczuk O, Czajkowski K, Grala B, Semczuk A. Immunohistochemical results and case report of an inciden- tal finding of uterine polypoid adenoma after long-time therapy for metrorrhagia. Pathology Research and Practice. 2020; 216: 152998.

[38] Heckl M, Schmoeckel E, Hertlein L, Rottmann M, Jeschke U, Mayr D. The ARID1A, p53 and ß-Catenin statuses are strong prognosticators in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary and the endometrium. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: e0192881.

[39] Wang J, Zhao Y, Xu H, Ma J, Liang F, Zou Q, et al. Silencing NID2 by DNA hypermethylation promotes lung cancer. Pathology and Oncology Research. 2020; 26: 801–811.

[40] Kuk C, Gunawardana CG, Soosaipillai A, Kobayashi H, Li L, Zheng Y, et al. Nidogen-2: a new serum biomarker for ovarian cancer. Clinical Biochemistry. 2010; 43: 355–361.

[41] Chai AWY, Cheung AKL, Dai W, Ko JMY, Lee NPY, Chan KT, et al. Elevated levels of serum nidogen-2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Biomarkers. 2018; 21: 583–590.

[42] Mathur R. ARID1A loss in cancer: towards a mechanistic understanding. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2018; 190: 15–23.

[43] Petrie WK, Dennis MK, Hu C, Dai D, Arterburn JB, Smith HO, et al. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-selective ligands modulate endometrial tumor growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2013; 2013: 472720.

[44] He YY, Du GQ, Cai B, Yan Q, Zhou L, Chen XY, et al. Estro- genic transmembrane receptor of GPR30 mediates invasion and carcinogenesis by endometrial cancer cell line RL95-2. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2012; 138: 775–783.

[45] Huang GS, Gunter MJ, Arend RC, Li M, Arias-Pulido H, Prossnitz ER, et al. Co-expression of GPR30 and ERβ and their associ- ation with disease progression in uterine carcinosarcoma. Ameri- can Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 203: 242.e1–242. e2425.

[46] Skrzypczak M, Schüler S, Lattrich C, Ignatov A, Ortmann O, Treeck O. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma and effect of agonist G-1 on growth of endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines. Steroids. 2013; 78: 1087–1091.

[47] Arias-Pulido H, Royce M, Gong Y, Joste N, Lomo L, Lee S, et al. GPR30 and estrogen receptor expression: new insights into hormone dependence of inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2010; 123: 51–58.

[48] Ignatov A, Ignatov T, Weissenborn C, Eggemann H, Bischoff J, Semczuk A, et al. G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30 and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2011; 128: 457–466.

[49] Wan J, Yin Y, Zhao M, Shen F, Chen M, Chen Q. The positivity of G-protein-coupled receptor-30 (GPR 30), an alternative estrogen receptor is not different between type 1 and type 2 endometrial cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 90897–90904.

[50] Park JY, Chong GO, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Park CM, Lee EH, et al. Transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) gene polymorphisms in Korean women with ovarian cancer: An experimental study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 2020, 41: 556–562.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top