Article Data

  • Views 1076
  • Dowloads 115

Reviews

Open Access Special Issue

Is minimal invasive surgical treatment of ovarian cancer plus HIPEC a utopia? A review of the literature

  • Victoria Psomiadou1,*,
  • Alexandros Fotiou1
  • Anastasia Prodromidou1
  • Christos Iavazzo1

1Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital, 18537 Piraeus, Greece

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4205149 Vol.42,Issue 5,October 2021 pp.1001-1005

Submitted: 10 April 2021 Accepted: 10 May 2021

Published: 15 October 2021

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Gynaecological Oncology)

*Corresponding Author(s): Victoria Psomiadou E-mail: psomiadouvictoria@gmail.com

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) approached by minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques. We conducted a systematic review of the published relevant studies and evaluated a total of 403 patients, with a median age of 57 years old (20–69). The histology of the patients included 160 (39.7%) patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei, 43 (10.6%) with mesothelioma peritonei, 37 (9.2%) with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), 80 (19.8%) with appen-diceal cancer and 26 (6.4%) with colon cancer, while the histology of the rest of the patients was not specified in the studies. The median Periotoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 4 (1–10) and complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved in 239 patients (60%). 145 (36%) of the patients underwent omentectomy, 37 patients (9.2%) under-went cecum/right colectomy, 41 patients (10.1%) underwent salpingovariectomy, 6 (1.5%) small bowel resection, 28 (6.7%) peritonectomies, in 9 (2.2%) sigmoeidectomy and 107 (26.5%) appendectomy, with a mean operative time of 240 min (90–510). Conversion to laparotomywas performed in 13 (3.2%) cases, while in 32 (7.9%) an intestinal anastomosis or suture was required. The median length of stay was 4.5 days (3–6) and the median follow-up of the patients was 13.5 months (1–72). We concluded that minimal invasive surgery can be considered as an approach in the application of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Further large studies with higher quality data are warranted to verify our findings.


Keywords

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; HIPEC; Minimal invasive surgery; MIS; Laparoscopic


Cite and Share

Victoria Psomiadou,Alexandros Fotiou,Anastasia Prodromidou,Christos Iavazzo. Is minimal invasive surgical treatment of ovarian cancer plus HIPEC a utopia? A review of the literature. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(5);1001-1005.

References

[1] Dumont F, Duchalais E, Aumont A, Thibaudeau E. Cytoreduc-tive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy by laparoscopy via a single-port approach for low-grade peritoneal malignancy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020; 34: 2789–2795.

[2] Alshammari T, Alshammari S, Hakami R, Alharbi A, Alyami M, Abdulla M, et al. Single-port laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. American Journal of Case Reports. 2019; 20: 1648–1651.

[3] Arjona-Sanchez A, Rufian-Peña S, Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Casado-Adam A, Cosano-Alvarez A, Briceño-Delgado J. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) by minimally invasive approach, an initial experience. World Journal of Surgery. 2018; 42: 3120–3124.

[4] Psomiadou V, Prodromidou A, Fotiou A, Lekka S, Iavazzo C. Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2021; 15: 155–163.

[5] Facchiano E, Scaringi S, Kianmanesh R, Sabate JM, Castel B, Flamant Y, et al. Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of malignant ascites sec-ondary to unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis from advanced gastric cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2008; 34: 154–158.

[6] Patriti A, Cavazzoni E, Graziosi L, Pisciaroli A, Luzi D, Gullà N, et al. Successful palliation of malignant ascites from peritoneal mesothelioma by laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2008; 18: 426–428.

[7] Valle M, Federici O, Garofalo A. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and role of laparoscopy in diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 2012; 21: 515–531.

[8] Esquivel J, Averbach A. Combined laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a patient with peritoneal mesothelioma. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2009; 19: 505–507.

[9] Passot G, Bakrin N, Isaac S, Decullier E, Gilly FN, Glehen O, et al. Postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic vs open cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014; 40: 957–962.

[10] Salti GI, Naffouje SA. Feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2019; 33: 52–57.

[11] Gabriel E, Elli E, Bagaria S, Wasif N, Grotz T, Stauffer J, et al. Robotic-assisted cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2019; 13: 175–179.

[12] Badgwell B, Blum M, Das P, Estrella J, Wang X, Ho L, et al. Phase II trial of laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfu-sion for peritoneal carcinomatosis or positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2017; 24: 3338–3344.

[13] Cianci S, Abatini C, Fagotti A, Chiofalo B, Tropea A, Biondi A, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies using new hybrid CO2 system: preliminary experience in referral center. Updates in Surgery. 2019; 71: 555–560.

[14] Fagotti A, Petrillo M, Costantini B, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Chiantera V, et al. Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC for recurrent ovarian cancer: a case series. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014; 132: 303–306.

[15] Nitecki R, Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A, Scambia G, Pareja R, Coleman RL, et al. Laparoscopic cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE). International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 30: 1450–1454.

[16] Gueli Alletti S, Capozzi VA, Rosati A, De Blasis I, Cianci S, Vizzielli G, et al. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Medica. 2019; 110: 341–357.

[17] Gueli Alletti S, Vizzielli G, Lafuenti L, Costantini B, Fagotti A, Fedele C, et al. Single-institution propensity-matched study to evaluate the psychological effect of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery versus standard laparotomic treatment: from body to mind and back. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018; 25: 816–822.

[18] Fagotti A, Gueli Alletti S, Corrado G, Cola E, Vizza E, Vieira M, et al. The international mission study: minimally invasive surgery in ovarian neoplasms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2019; 29: 5–9.

[19] Gallotta V, Ghezzi F, Vizza E, Fagotti A, Ceccaroni M, Fanfani F, et al. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer patients with localized carcinomatosis and lymph node metastases: results of a retrospective multi-institutional series. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016; 23: 590–596.

[20] Uccella S, Franchi MP, Cianci S, Zorzato PC, Bertoli F, Alletti SG, et al. Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review. Gland Surgery. 2020; 9: 1130–1139.

[21] Koole SN, Bruijs L, Fabris C, Sikorska K, Engbersen M, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, et al. Central radiology assessment of the randomized phase III open-label OVHIPEC-1 trial in ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 30: 1928–1934.

[22] Koole S, van Stein R, Sikorska K, Barton D, Perrin L, Brennan D, et al. Primary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: OVHIPEC-2, a phase III randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 30: 888–892.

[23] Gesson-Paute A, Ferron G, Thomas F, de Lara EC, Chatelut E, Querleu D. Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin during open versus laparoscopically assisted heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): an experimental study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2008; 15: 339–344.

[24] Petrillo M, Zucchetti M, Cianci S, Morosi L, Ronsini C, Colombo A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cisplatin during open and minimally-invasive secondary cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2019; 30: e59.

[25] Bălescu I, Godoroja D, Gongu M, Tomulescu V, Copăescu C. Laparoscopic HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer-technique and early outcomes of our first cases. Chirurgia. 2017; 112: 714–725.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top