Article Data

  • Views 1091
  • Dowloads 155

Original Research

Open Access

Microbiological characteristics of early and late infectious complications following total pelvic exenteration due to cervical cancer recurrence—the significance of infections in long-term outcomes

  • Maria Szymankiewicz1
  • Sebastian Szubert2,*,

1Department of Microbiology, The Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland

22nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bielanski Hospital, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4204112 Vol.42,Issue 4,August 2021 pp.742-751

Submitted: 10 May 2021 Accepted: 21 June 2021

Published: 15 August 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Sebastian Szubert E-mail: szuberts@o2.pl

Abstract

Objective: We analysed microbiological results of early and late infectious complications following total pelvic exenteration (TPE) due to cervical cancer recurrence and evaluated the significance of infections in patient survival. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 13 out of 31 patients who had undergone TPE due to cervical cancer, from February 2013 to January 2018. Results: Early and late infections occurred in 7 (53.8%) patients and 6 (46.1%) patients, respectively. Superficial and deep surgical site infections (SSIs) were the only ones that appeared as early infections. Late infections, besides SSIs (4/13; 30.8%), also included urinary infections (2/13; 15.4%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Enterococcus spp. (9/28; 32.1%) and Escherichia coli (6/28; 21.4%). There was no resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid among Enterocccus spp. Among gram-negative rods, there was no resistance to meropenem and imipenem. We found three ESBL (extended-spectrum ß-lactamase) producers. Patients diagnosed with early deep SSIs had a shortened median overall survival (5.0 months vs. 11.5 months, P = 0.03). Patient survival was neither related to the occurrence of early superficial infections nor to late infections. Conclusions: Our results suggest that early, especially early deep, SSI may worse the prognosis of patients after TPE. The time of infection management after the operation should be especially intensified within 1 month after TPE.


Keywords

Cervical cancer recurrence; Total pelvic exenteration; Post-operative infections

Cite and Share

Maria Szymankiewicz,Sebastian Szubert. Microbiological characteristics of early and late infectious complications following total pelvic exenteration due to cervical cancer recurrence—the significance of infections in long-term outcomes. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(4);742-751.

References

[1] Diver EJ, Rauh-Hain JA, del Carmen MG. Total Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancies. International Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012; 2012: 1–9.

[2] Lewandowska A, Szubert S, Koper K, Koper A, Cwynar G, Wicherek L. Analysis of long-term outcomes in 44 patients following pelvic exenteration due to cervical cancer. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020; 18: 234.

[3] Yoo HJ, Lim MC, Seo S, Kang S, Yoo CW, Kim J, et al. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: ten-year experience at National Cancer Center in Korea. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 23: 242–250.

[4] Lago V, Poveda I, Padilla-Iserte P, Simón-Sanz E, García-Granero Á, Pontones JL, et al. Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic cancer: complications and oncological outcome. Gynecological Surgery. 2019; 16: 1.

[5] Li L, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, Wu M. Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent and Persistent Cervical Cancer. Chinese Medical Journal. 2018; 131: 1541–1548.

[6] Petruzziello A, Kondo W, Hatschback SB, Guerreiro JA, Filho FP, Vendrame C, et al. Surgical results of pelvic exenteration in the treatment of gynecologic cancer. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014; 12: 279.

[7] Berek JS, Howe C, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005; 99: 153–159.

[8] Matsuo K, Mandelbaum RS, Adams CL, Roman LD, Wright JD. Performance and outcome of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a population-based study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2019; 153: 368–375.

[9] Benn T, Brooks RA, Zhang Q, Powell MA, Thaker PH, Mutch DG, et al. Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: a single institution study over 20 years. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 122: 14–18.

[10] Tortorella L, Casarin J, Mara KC, Weaver AL, Multinu F, Glaser GE, et al. Prediction of short-term surgical complications in women undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies. Gynecologic Oncology. 2019; 152: 151–156.

[11] Zembower TR. Epidemiology of infections in cancer patients. Cancer Treatment and Research. 2014; 161: 43–89.

[12] Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Abu-Rustum NR. Principles of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery. In Ramirez PT, Salvo G (eds.) Principles of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery (pp. 207–225). 1st edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2018.

[13] Pouncey AL, Scott AJ, Alexander JL, Marchesi J, Kinross J. Gut microbiota, chemotherapy and the host: The influence of the gut microbiota on cancer treatment. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018; 12: 868.

[14] Chiantera V, Rossi M, De Iaco P, Koehler C, Marnitz S, Ferrandina G, et al. Survival after curative pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective multicentric study of 167 patients. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014; 24: 916–922.

[15] Cata JP, Gottumukkala V. Blood Loss and Massive Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Oncological Surgery: what do we Know? ISRN Anesthesiology. 2012; 2012: 1–11.

[16] Vigneswaran HT, Schwarzman LS, Madueke IC, David SM, Nordenstam J, Moreira D, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Total Pelvic Exenteration for Malignancy in the US. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021; 28: 2790–2800.

[17] Khoury-Collado F, Einstein MH, Bochner BH, Alektiar KM, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Pelvic exenteration with curative intent for recurrent uterine malignancies. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 124: 42–47.

[18] Kolomainen DF, Barton DP. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynaecological cancer after radiotherapy. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2017; 19: 109–118.

[19] Lachiewicz MP, Moulton LJ, Jaiyeoba O. Pelvic surgical site infections in gynecologic surgery. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 2015: 614950.

[20] Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. American Journal of Infection Control. 2008; 36: 309–332.

[21] EUCAST. EUCAST guidelines for detection of resistance mechanisms and specific resistances of clinical and/or epidemiological importance. 2017. Available at: https://www.eucast.org/resistanc e_mechanisms/ (Accessed: 11 June 2017).

[22] Żabicka D, Baraniak A, Literacka E, Gniadkowski M, Hryniewicz

W. Wykrywanie karbapenemaz-zalecenia 2015. Narodowy Instytut Leków. 2017; 1–9. (In Polish)

[23] Marnitz S, Köhler C, Müller M, Behrens K, Hasenbein K, Schneider A. Indications for primary and secondary exenterations in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 103: 1023–1030.

[24] Goldberg GL, Sukumvanich P, Einstein MH, Smith HO, Anderson PS, Fields AL. Total pelvic exenteration: the Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Experience (1987 to 2003). Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 101: 261–268.

[25] Chen CS, Ou YC, Lin H, Wang CJ, Chen HC, Fang FM, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in uterine cervical carcinoma with isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence. American Journal of Translational Research. 2019; 11: 7492–7502.

[26] Hryniewicz W, Kulig J, Ozorowski T, Kulig P, Wąchol D. Stosowanie antybiotyków w profilaktyce okołooperacyjnej. 2011. Available at: http://antybiotyki.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/Rek omendacje/stosowanie-antybiotykow.pdf (Accessed: 27 September 2011).

[27] Koh CE, Solomon MJ, Brown KG, Austin K, Byrne CM, Lee P, et al. The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2017; 60: 627–635.

[28] Ishibashi K, Ishida H, Kuwabara K, Ohsawa T, Okada N, Yokoyama M, et al. Short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis for elective rectal cancer surgery: results of a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. Surgery Today. 2014; 44: 716–722.

[29] Harbarth S, Samore MH, Lichtenberg D, Carmeli Y. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2916–2921.

[30] Das S, Adler AL, Miles-Jay A, Kronman MP, Qin X, Weissman SJ, et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis is Associated with Subsequent Resistant Infections in Children with an Initial Extended-Spectrum-Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017; 61: e02656-16.

[31] Cohen ME, Salmasian H, Li J, Liu J, Zachariah P, Wright JD, et al. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Risk for Postoperative Antibiotic-Resistant Infections. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017; 225: 631–638.e3.

[32] Martínez A, Filleron T, Vitse L, Querleu D, Mery E, Balague G, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: is there any advantage? Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 120: 374–379.

[33] Hackemer P, Małkiewicz B, Menzel F, Tupikowski K, Drabik A, Zdrojowy R. Early postoperative complications and 90-day mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej. 2020; 74: 354–361.

[34] McLean KA, Zhang W, Dunsmoor-Su RF, Shah CA, Gray HJ, Swensen RE, et al. Pelvic exenteration in the age of modern chemoradiation. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 121: 131–134.

[35] Alizadehmohajer N, Shojaeifar S, Nedaeinia R, Esparvarinha M, Mohammadi F, Ferns GA, et al. Association between the microbiota and women’s cancers – Cause or consequences? Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2020; 127: 110203.

[36] Iwasaki R, Motomura H, Hatano T, Sakahara D, Fujii N. Re-construction of Pelvic Exenteration Defects Using the Combined Method with Extended Vertical Rectus Abdominus Flap and Vacuum-Assisted Suction Drainage. International Surgery. 2020; 104: 138–142.

[37] Armbruster CE, Mobley HLT, Pearson MM. Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis Infection. EcoSal Plus. 2018; 8: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0009-2017.

[38] Lin M, Liou M, Kuo C, Lin Y, Chen J, Kuo H. Antimicrobial Sus-ceptibility and Molecular Epidemiology of Proteus mirabilis Isolates from Three Hospitals in Northern Taiwan. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2019; 25: 1338–1346.

[39] Kristich CJ, Rice LB, Arias CA. Enterococcal Infection—Treatment and Antibiotic Resistance. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 2014. 2014. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649502 (Accessed: 6 February 2014).


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top