Article Data

  • Views 699
  • Dowloads 137

Original Research

Open Access

Prognostic factors in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with radiation therapy

  • Nobuaki Kosaka1
  • Kiyoshi Hasegawa1,2,*,
  • Kaori Kiuchi1
  • Emi Motegi1
  • EYasuo Ejima3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, 113-8655 Tochigi, Japan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inuyama Chuo General Hospital, Inuyama, 484-8511 Aichi, Japan

3Department of Radiation Therapy Center, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, 113-8655 Tochigi, Japan

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.02.2288 Vol.42,Issue 2,April 2021 pp.311-318

Submitted: 29 October 2020 Accepted: 21 December 2020

Published: 15 April 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Kiyoshi Hasegawa E-mail: hasek@dokkyomed.ac.jp

Abstract

Objectives: Radiation therapy (RT) for recurrent ovarian cancer may be considered not only for palliation of symptoms, but also to prolong survival in selected patients. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of RT and associated prognostic factors. Methods: The relationship between clinicopathological factors including age, PS, FIGO stage at initial diagnosis, histological type, number of relapsed lesions (solitary or multiple), aim of RT (curative or palliative intent), and treatment-free interval (TFI) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in 17 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with RT. Results: The median age was 58.5 years. Eight patients (three with solitary and five with multiple relapsed lesions) were treated with curative-intent RT, and nine patients (all with multiple relapsed lesions) were treated with palliative RT. Response to RT was as follows: CR: 3 patients, PR: 5 patients, SD: 3 patients, and PD: 6 patients. The response rate (CR + PR) and disease control rate (CR + PR + SD) were 47.1% and 64.7%, respectively; neither were associated with TFI. The 2-year PFS and OS rates after RT were 11.8% and 29.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, solitary relapsed lesions and curative-intent RT were judged as favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. However, in multivariate analysis, only curative-intent RT was identified as an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: 3.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–12.00, P = 0.045). Conclusions: This retrospective study indicated that curative-intent RT may be an effective treatment method for patients when clinically indicated, regardless of whether recurrent tumors are sensitive to chemotherapy.

Keywords

Recurrent ovarian cancer; Radiation therapy; Curative-intent RT; Palliative RT; Prognostic factors

Cite and Share

Nobuaki Kosaka,Kiyoshi Hasegawa,Kaori Kiuchi,Emi Motegi,EYasuo Ejima. Prognostic factors in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with radiation therapy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(2);311-318.

References

[1] NCCN Guideline Version 3. Ovarian Cancer. 2019. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.a spx (Accessed: 12 January 2020).

[2] Cmelak AJ, Kapp DS. Long-term survival with whole abdominopelvic irradiation in platinum-refractory persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 1997; 65: 453– 460.

[3] Corn BW, Lanciano RM, Boente M, Hunter WM, Ladazack J, Ozols RF. Recurrent ovarian cancer. Effective radiotherapeutic palliation after chemotherapy failure. Cancer. 1994; 74: 2979– 2983.

[4] Tinger A, Waldron T, Peluso N, Katin MJ, Dosoretz DE, Blitzer PH, et al. Effective palliative radiation therapy in advanced and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2001; 51: 1256–1263.

[5] Smart A, Chen Y, Cheng T, King M, Lee L. Salvage radiation therapy for localized recurrent ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2019; 29: 916–921.

[6] Komura N, Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Yokoi E, Shimura K, Matsumoto Y, et al. Radiotherapy for isolated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2019; 45: 1173–1182.

[7] Albuquerque K, Patel M, Liotta M, Harkenrider M, Guo R, Small W, et al. Long-term benefit of tumor volume-directed involved field radiation therapy in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2016; 26: 655–660.

[8] Yahara K, Ohguri T, Imada H, Yamaguchi S, Kawagoe T, Matsuura Y, et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer: definitive radiotherapy for limited recurrence after complete remission had been achieved with aggressive front-line therapy. Journal of Radiation Research. 2013; 54: 322–329.

[9] Firat S, Erickson B. Selective irradiation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma involving the vagina or rectum. Gynecologic Oncology. 2001; 80: 213–220.

[10] Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, Friedlander M, Vergote I, Rustin G, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2014; 15: 852–861.

[11] Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer. 2009; 45: 228–247.

[12] Ozols RF. Systemic therapy for ovarian cancer: current status and new treatments. Seminars in Oncology. 2006; 33: S3–S11.

[13] Colombo N, Sessa C, Bois AD, Ledermann J, McCluggage W, McNeish I, et al. ESMO–ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2019; 29: 728–760.

[14] Harter P, du Bois A, Hahmann M, Hasenburg A, Burges A, Loibl S, et al. Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2006; 13: 1702–1710.

[15] Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A, Hasenburg A, Scambia G, Cibula D, et al. Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2011; 21: 289–295.

[16] Coleman RL, Enserro D, Spirtos N, Herzog TJ, Sabbatini P, Armstrong DK, et al. A phase III randomized controlled trial of secondary surgical cytoreduction (SSC) followed by platinumbased combination chemotherapy (PBC), with or without be- vacizumab (B) in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (PSOC): a NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018; 36: 5501.

[17] Aghajanian C, Blank SV, Goff BA, Judson PL, Teneriello MG, Husain A, et al. OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012; 30: 2039–2045.

[18] Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, Reuss A, Poveda A, Kristensen G, et al. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the AURELIA openlabel randomized phase III trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014; 32: 1302–1308.

[19] Pujade-Lauraine E, Ledermann JA, Selle F, Gebski V, Penson RT, Oza AM, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18: 1274–1284.

[20] Choi N, Chang JH, Kim S, Kim HJ. Radiation for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a need for reassessment. Radiation Oncology Journal. 2019; 35: 144–152.

[21] Lee S, Park S, Kim Y, Kim Y, Choi E, Kim D, et al. Radiation therapy is a treatment to be considered for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer after chemotherapy. Tumori. 2011; 97: 590–595.

[22] Kim N, Chang JS, Kim SW, Kim GM, Lee JY, Kim YB. Involvedfield radiation therapy for selected cases of recurrent ovarian cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2019; 30: e67.

[23] Brown AP, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Eifel PJ. Involved-field radiation therapy for locoregionally recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 130: 300–305.

[24] Jiang G, Balboni T, Taylor A, Liu J, Lee LJ. Palliative radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: efficacy and predictors of clinical response. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2018; 28: 43–50.

[25] Eifel PJ. Role of radiation therapy. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017; 41: 118–125.

[26] Chundury A, Apicelli A, DeWees T, Powell M, Mutch D, Thaker P, et al. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer refractory to chemotherapy. Gynecologic Oncology. 2016; 141: 134–139.

[27] Chang JS, Kim SW, Kim Y, Kim J, Park S, Kim JH, et al. Involved- field radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a multi-institutional prospective phase II trial. Gynecologic Oncology. 2018; 151: 39–45.

[28] Macchia G, Lazzari R, Colombo N, Laliscia C, Capelli G, D’Agostino GR, et al. A large, multicenter, retrospective study on efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic ovarian cancer (MITO RT1 Study): a collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO groups. The Oncologist. 2020; 25: e311–e320.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top