Article Data

  • Views 862
  • Dowloads 144

Original Research

Open Access

Usefulness of laparoscopic restaging surgery for patients diagnosed with apparent early ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer by a prior surgery, a case control observational study in a single institute in Japan

  • Hiroshi Yoshida1,2,*,
  • Megumi Yamamoto2,3
  • Hiroyuki Shigeta2
  • Miwa Yasaka1
  • Hiroko Machida1
  • Masae Ikeda1
  • Masako Shida1
  • Takeshi Hirasawa1
  • Mikio Mikami1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Address: 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital, Address: 1-1 Mitsuzawa-nishi-cho, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama, 221-0855, Kanagawa, Japan

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Address: 2-8-1 Yotsui, 910-8526, Fukui, Japan

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.06.2224 Vol.41,Issue 6,December 2020 pp.960-968

Submitted: 20 August 2020 Accepted: 25 September 2020

Published: 15 December 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Hiroshi Yoshida E-mail: h-yoshida@tsc.u-tokai.ac.jp

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and short-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic restaging surgery for patients diagnosed with apparent early ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer by a prior surgery in Japan. A total of 22 patients with apparent early stage ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer underwent laparoscopic restaging surgery. Surgical results and oncological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of apparent early stage ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer was determined by prior laparoscopic or laparotomic surgery in 15 cases and 7 cases, respectively. The apparent stages IA, IC, and II were observed in 10, 10, and 2 cases, respectively. The average operation time and estimated blood loss was 266.7 ± 85.7 minutes and 252 ± 388.5 mL, respectively. The average total number of harvested lymph nodes was 88.2 ± 24.4. Up-staging was found in 3 cases (13.6%), 1 case of IIIA1(ii) and 2 cases of IIIB. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 2 cases (9.0%). Intra- and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III) occurred in 4 cases (18.1%). Three patients with recurrence were found during the median observation period of 17 months. All of these patients were diagnosed as stage III during restaging surgery. No recurrence was found in cases of stage I or II. Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic restaging surgery for early stage ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer is feasible and safe, and oncological outcomes are comparable to conventional staging surgery. Further large-scale randomized control studies are necessary to confirm the non-inferiority of laparoscopic restaging surgery compared with open surgery.


Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Staging surgery; Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.


Cite and Share

Hiroshi Yoshida,Megumi Yamamoto,Hiroyuki Shigeta,Miwa Yasaka,Hiroko Machida,Masae Ikeda,Masako Shida,Takeshi Hirasawa,Mikio Mikami. Usefulness of laparoscopic restaging surgery for patients diagnosed with apparent early ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer by a prior surgery, a case control observational study in a single institute in Japan. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(6);960-968.

References

[1] Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A.: “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries”. Ca. Cancer J. Clin., 2018, 68, 394-424.

[2] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M.R., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S., et al.: “Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group LAP2 study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2012, 30, 695-700.

[3] Childers J.M., Lang J., Surwit E.A., Hatch K.D.: “Laparoscopic surgical staging of ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 59, 25-33.

[4] Vasilev S.A., McGonigle K.F.: “Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 61, 315-320.

[5] Dargent D., Ansquer Y., Mathevet P.: “Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 77, 87-92.

[6] Park J., Kim D., Suh D., Kim J., Kim Y., Kim Y., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2008, 15, 2012-2019.

[7] Ghezzi F., Malzoni M., Vizza E., Cromi A., Perone C., Corrado G., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer: results of a multi-institutional cohort study”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 19, 1589-1594.

[8] Bogani G., Cromi A., Serati M., Di Naro E., Casarin J., Pinelli C., et al.: “Laparoscopic and open abdominal staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: our experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis of comparative studies”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 1241-1249.

[9] Liu M., Li L., He Y., Peng D., Wang X., Chen W., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical management of early-stage ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 352- 357.

[10] Minig L., Saadi J., Patrono M.G., Giavedoni M.E., Cárdenas-Rebollo J.M., Perrotta M.: “Laparoscopic surgical staging in women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer performed by recently certified gynecologic oncologists”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2016, 201, 94-100.

[11] Gallotta V., Ghezzi F., Vizza E., Chiantera V., Ceccaroni M., Franchi M., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging of apparent early stage ovarian cancer: results of a large, retrospective, multi-institutional series”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 135, 428-434.

[12] Tozzi R., Köhler C., Ferrara A., Schneider A.: “Laparoscopic treatment of early ovarian cancer: surgical and survival outcomes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 199-203.

[13] Leblanc E., Querleu D., Narducci F., Occelli B., Papageorgiou T., Sonoda Y.: “Laparoscopic staging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 624-629.

[14] Chi D.S., Abu-Rustum N.R., Sonoda Y., Ivy J., Rhee E., Moore K., et al.: “The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 192, 1614-1619.

[15] Colomer A.T., Jiménez A.M., Bover Barceló M.I.: “Laparoscopic treatment and staging of early ovarian cancer”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2008, 15, 414-419.

[16] Nezhat F.R., Ezzati M., Chuang L., Shamshirsaz A.A., Rahaman J., Gretz H.: “Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 200, 83.e1-83.e6.

[17] Jung U.S., Lee J.H., Kyung M.S., Choi J.S.: “Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2009, 35, 113-118.

[18] Lee M., Kim S.W., Paek J., Lee S.H., Yim G.W., Kim J.H., et al.: “Comparisons of surgical outcomes, complications, and costs between laparotomy and laparoscopy in early-stage ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2011, 21, 251-256.

[19] Schreuder H.W.R., Pattij T.O.S., Zweemer R.P., van Baal M.W., Verheijen R.H.M.: “Increasing experience in laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 9, 89-96.

[20] Brockbank E.C., Harry V., Kolomainen D., Mukhopadhyay D., Sohaib A., Bridges J.E., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging for apparent early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer. First case series from a UK cancer centre and systematic literature review”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013, 39, 912-917.

[21] Lee C., Kusunoki S., Huang C., Wu K., Lee P., Huang K.: “Surgical and survival outcomes of laparoscopic staging surgery for patients with stage I ovarian cancer”. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2018, 57, 7- 12.

[22] Angioli R., Plotti F., Palaia I., Calcagno M., Montera R., Cafà E.V., et al.: “Update on lymphadenectomy in early and advanced ovarian cancer”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 20, 34-39.

[23] Kitagawa M., Katayama K., Furuno A., Okada Y., Yumori A., Sakakibara H., et al.: “Safety of total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive. Ther., 2017, 6, 6-11.

[24] Prodromidou A., Machairas N., Spartalis E., Kostakis I.D., Iavazzo C., Moris D., et al.: “Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparo-scopic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Anticancer Res., 2018, 38, 4677-4681.

[25] Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Uccella S., Bergamini V., Tomera S., Franchi M., et al.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 409-413.

[26] Bae J., Choi J.S., Lee W.M., Koh A.R., Jung U.S., Ko J.H., et al.: “Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic restaging surgery for women with unexpected ovarian malignancy”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod Biol., 2015, 193, 46-50.

[27] Soper J.T, Johnson P., Johnson V., Berchuck A., Clarke-Pearson D. L.: “Comprehensive restaging laparotomy in women with apparent early ovarian carcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 80, 949-953.

[28] Stier E.A., Barakat R.R., Curtin J.P., Brown C.L., Jones W.B., Hoskins W.J.: “Laparotomy to complete staging of presumed early ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 87, 737-740.

[29] Muzii L., Angioli R., Zullo M., Panici P.B.: “The unexpected ovarian malignancy found during operative laparoscopy: Incidence, management, and implications for prognosis”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2005, 12, 81-89.

[30] Kleppe M., Wang T., Van Gorp T., Slangen B.F., Kruse A.J., Kruit-wagen R.F.: “Lymph node metastasis in stageI and II ovarian cancer: a review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 123, 610-614.

[31] Gallotta V., Petrillo M., Conte C., Vizzielli G., Fagotti A., Ferrandina G., et al.: “Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgical staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: a case-control study”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2016, 23, 769-774.

[32] Park H.J., Kim D.W., Yim G.W., Nam E.J., Kim S., Kim Y.T.: “Staging laparoscopy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: a metaanalysis”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 209, 58.e1-58. e8.

[33] Bogani G., Borghi C., Leone Roberti Maggiore U., Ditto A., Signorelli M., Martinelli F., et al.: “Minimally invasive surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2017, 24, 552-562.

[34] Melamed A., Keating N.L., Clemmer J.T., Bregar A.J., Wright J.D., Boruta D.M., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2017, 216, 50.e1-50. e12.

[35] Radosa J.C., Radosa M.P., Schweitzer P.A., Juhasz-Boess I., Rim-bach S., Solomayer E.: “Report of the survey on current opinions and practice of German Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) members regarding the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian malignancies”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2018, 297, 1255-1264.

[36] Shiota M., Kotani Y., Umemoto M., Tobiume T., Hoshiai H.: “Study of the correlation between tumor size and cyst rupture in laparotomy and laparoscopy for benign ovarian tumor: is 10 cm the limit for laparoscopy?”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2012, 38, 531-534.

[37] Smorgick N., Barel O., Halperin R., Schneider D., Pansky M.: “Laparoscopic removal of adnexal cysts: is it possible to decrease inadvertent intraoperative rupture rate?”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 200, 237.e1-237.e3.

[38] Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Richardson D.L., Seamon L.G., Aletti G.D., Powless C.A., Keeney G.L., et al.: “Influence of intraoperative capsule rupture on outcomes in stage I epithelialovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 113, 11-7.

[39] VergoteI., Brabanter J.D., Fyles A., Bertelsen K., Einhorn N., Sevelda P., et al.: “Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carci-noma”. Lancet., 2001, 357, 176-182.

[40] Rosendahl M., Mosgaard B.J., Høgdall C.:“The influence of cyst emptying, lymph node resection and chemotherapyon survival in stage IA and IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer”. Anticancer Res., 2016, 36, 5373-5379.

[41] Kajiyama H., Suzuki S., Yoshikawa N., Kawai M., Nagasaka T., Kikkawa F.: “Survival impact of capsule status in stage I ovarian mucinous carcinoma-A mulicentric retrospective study”. Eur. J. Ob-stet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2019, 234, 131-136.

[42] Matsuo K., Machida H., Yamagami W., Ebina Y., Kobayashi Y., Tabata T., et al.: “Intraoperative capsule rupture, postoperative chemotherapy, and survival of women with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2019, 134, 1017-1026.

[43] Ahmed F.Y., Wiltshaw E., A’Hern R.P., Nicol B., Shepherd J., Blake P., et al.: “Natural history and prognosis of untreated stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma.”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1996, 14, 2968-2975.

[44] Kim H.S., Ahn J.H., Chung H.H., Kim J.W., Park N.H., Song Y.S., et al.: “Impact of intraoperative rupture of the ovarian capsule on prognosis in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013, 39, 279-289.

[45] Shah J.S., Mackelvie M., Gershenson D.M., Ramalingam P., Kott M. M., Brown J., et al.: “Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors by hospital type”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2019, 26, 87-93.

[46] Ratnavelu N.D., Brown A.P., Mallett S., Scholten R.J., Patel A., Founta C., et al.: “Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses”. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2016, 3, CD010360.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top