Article Data

  • Views 359
  • Dowloads 141

Original Research

Open Access

Do women's fatalistic tendencies affect their attitudes toward the early diagnosis of cervical cancer?

  • Melike Yalçın Gürsoy1,*,
  • Beray Tepebaşı2

1Nursing Department, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100 Çanakkale, Turkey

2Malkara State Hospital, 59300 Tekirdağ, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2025.021 Vol.46,Issue 2,February 2025 pp.64-70

Submitted: 30 July 2024 Accepted: 04 September 2024

Published: 15 February 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Melike Yalçın Gürsoy E-mail: myalcin@comu.edu.tr

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in women, and early diagnosis can significantly reduce mortality rates. However, cervical cancer screening rates have not reached the desired levels. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between women’s fatalistic tendencies and their attitudes toward the early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024 and included 385 women. Data were collected through an online survey, which featured a personal information form, the Attitudes Toward the Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer Scale (AEDCCS), and the Fatalistic Tendency Scale (FTS). Results: The mean scores for the AEDCCS and the FTS total scales were 101.2 ± 10.4 and 73.5 ± 9.3, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the AEDCCS total score and the superstition subscale of the FTS (t = −2.370; β = −0.540) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate that women’s superstitious beliefs are predictors of their attitudes toward early detection of cervical cancer. It is recommended that health professionals consider women’s fatalistic tendencies and superstitious beliefs when designing educational and informational programs to encourage participation in cervical cancer screening.


Keywords

Cervical cancer; Early diagnosis; Fatalistic tendency


Cite and Share

Melike Yalçın Gürsoy,Beray Tepebaşı. Do women's fatalistic tendencies affect their attitudes toward the early diagnosis of cervical cancer?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2025. 46(2);64-70.

References

[1] Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. The Lancet. 2019; 393: 169–182.

[2] World Health Organization. Cervical cancer. 2024. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer (Accessed: 28 March 2023).

[3] World Health Organization. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention: use of mRNA tests for human papillomavirus (HPV). 2nd edn. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2021.

[4] Yaslı G. Field evaluation of the national screening program for cervical cancer in Turkey. Sağlık ve Toplum. 2022; 32: 14–22. (In Turkish)

[5] Lemp JM, De Neve JW, Bussmann H, Chen S, Manne-Goehler J, Theilmann M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of cervical cancer screening in 55 low- and middle-income countries. JAMA. 2020; 324: 1532–1542.

[6] Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, Alemany L, Cowan M, Herrero R, et al. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2022; 10: e1115–e1127.

[7] Chua B, Ma V, Asjes C, Lim A, Mohseni M, Wee HL. Barriers to and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among women in Southeast Asia: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 4586.

[8] Petersen Z, Jaca A, Ginindza TG, Maseko G, Takatshana S, Ndlovu P, et al. Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening services in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Women’s Health. 2022; 22: 486.

[9] Ayanto SY, Belachew Lema T, Wordofa MA. Women’s and health professionals’ perceptions, beliefs and barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in Southern Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 2023; 31: 2258477.

[10] Maercker A, Ben-Ezra M, Esparza OA, Augsburger M. Fatalism as a traditional cultural belief potentially relevant to trauma sequelae: measurement equivalence, extent and associations in six countries. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2019; 10: 1657371.

[11] Kasapoglu A. Fatalism in the holy Quran. Hikmet Yurdu Journal of Social Sciences Research. 2008; l: 87–107. (In Turkish)

[12] Duru G, Topatan S. A barrier to participation in cervical cancer screenings: fatalism. Women’s Health. 2023; 63: 436–444.

[13] Afsah YR, Kaneko N. Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrant Muslim women: a systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23: 2375.

[14] Azhar S, Wyatt LC, Jokhakar V, Patel S, Raveis VH, Kwon SC, et al. Associations between spiritual health locus of control, perceived discrimination and breast and cervical cancer screening for Muslim American women in New York city. Clinical Breast Cancer. 2022; 22: e586–e596.

[15] Benidir A, Levert MJ, Bilodeau K. The role of Islamic beliefs in facilitating acceptance of cancer diagnosis. Current Oncology. 2023; 30: 7789–7801.

[16] Rimande-Joel R, Ekenedo GO. Knowledge, belief and practice of cervical cancer screening and prevention among women of Taraba, North-East Nigeria. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2019; 20: 3291–3298.

[17] Kakotkin VV, Semina EV, Zadorkina TG, Agapov MA. Prevention strategies and early diagnosis of cervical cancer: current state and prospects. Diagnostics. 2023; 13: 610.

[18] Ozmen D, Ozsoy S. Developing an attitude scale for early diagnosis of cervical cancer with a health belief model approach. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty. 2009; 25: 51–69. (In Turkish)

[19] Kaya A, Bozkur B. Development of fatalism tendency scale: validity and reliability study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2015; 11: 935–946. (In Turkish)

[20] Shrestha AD, Andersen JG, Gyawali B, Shrestha A, Shrestha S, Neupane D, et al. Cervical cancer screening utilization, and associated factors, in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2022; 210: 16–25.

[21] Bakan AB, Aslan G, Yıldız M. Determination of breast cancer fatalism in women and the investigation of the relationship between women’s cervical cancer and pap smear test health beliefs with religious orientation and fatalism. Journal of Religion and Health. 2021; 60: 1856–1876.

[22] Srinath A, van Merode F, Rao SV, Pavlova M. Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Policy and Planning. 2023; 38: 509–527.

[23] Ubah C, Nwaneri AC, Anarado AN, Iheanacho PN, Odikpo LC. Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake among women of an urban community in South-Eastern Nigeria. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2022; 23: 1959–1965.

[24] Agide FD, Garmaroudi G, Sadeghi R, Shakibazadeh E, Yaseri M, Koricha ZB, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake. European Journal of Public Health. 2018; 28: 1156–1162.

[25] Marván ML, Ehrenzweig Y, Catillo-López RL. Fatalistic beliefs and cervical cancer screening among Mexican women. Health Care for Women International. 2016; 37: 140–154.

[26] Christie-de Jong F, Kotzur M, Amiri R, Ling J, Mooney JD, Robb KA. Qualitative evaluation of a codesigned faith-based intervention for Muslim women in Scotland to encourage uptake of breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening. BMJ Open. 2022; 12: e058739.

[27] Yalcin Gursoy M, Tanriverdi G. Cultural dimension of women’s cancers. In Yıldırım G (ed.) Gynecological cancers current issues and care (pp. 467–478). Nobel Yayınevi: Adana, Türkiye. 2023.

[28] Tanrıverdi G. Approaches and recommendations for improving the cultural competence in nursing. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2017; 25: 227–236.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top