Article Data

  • Views 282
  • Dowloads 139

Original Research

Open Access

Development and pilot evaluation of a decision aid for modern cervical screening

  • Carla Pecoraro1
  • Lilantha Wedisinghe1,2,*,
  • Jeevan Jangam1
  • Gabrielle Dore1
  • Cassandra Harrison1
  • Gary Chan3
  • Abineash Mayooran4

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ipswich Hospital, 4305 Ipswich, QLD, Australia

2Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, 4006 Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, 4072 Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4Medical Undergraduate, James Cook University, 4814 Townsville, QLD, Australia

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.119 Vol.45,Issue 6,December 2024 pp.81-89

Submitted: 22 March 2024 Accepted: 10 April 2024

Published: 15 December 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Lilantha Wedisinghe E-mail: Lilantha.Wedisinghe@health.qld.gov.au

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a cervical screening decision aid for countries which could choose between self- or clinician-collected sample for primary Human Papillomavirus (HPV) based cervical screening. A structured development process based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards was used, including a systematic literature search for existing decision aids, a medical literature review, structured development of the decision aid which includes many iterative revisions, focus group discussions with screen eligible women, internal and external peer review by Gynaecology and non-Gynaecology experts, and finally field tested among 360 women. Most women considered the decision aid clear, helpful in decision making and would recommend it to others. This systematically developed decision aid appears to be suitable for wider use.


Keywords

Cervical screening; Decision aid; Self-collection; Cervical sampling; Clinician-collected; Human papillomavirus; Cancer of the cervix; Gynaecology; Women’s health


Cite and Share

Carla Pecoraro,Lilantha Wedisinghe,Jeevan Jangam,Gabrielle Dore,Cassandra Harrison,Gary Chan,Abineash Mayooran. Development and pilot evaluation of a decision aid for modern cervical screening. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(6);81-89.

References

[1] Whop LJ, Smith MA, Butler TL, Adcock A, Bartholomew K, Goodman MT, et al. Achieving cervical cancer elimination among Indigenous women. Preventive Medicine. 2021; 144: 106314.

[2] Coory MD, Muller JM, Dunn NAM, Fagan PS. Participation in cervical cancer screening by women in rural and remote aboriginal and Torres strait islander communities in Queensland. Medical Journal of Australia. 2002; 177: 544–547.

[3] ACPCC. The national strategy for the elimination of cervical cancer. 2023. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-11/national-strategy-for-the-elimination-of-cervical-cancer-in-australia.pdf (Accessed: 22 March 2024).

[4] Dodd RH, Mac OA, McCaffery KJ. Women’s experiences of the renewed national cervical screening program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e039041.

[5] Landy R, Sasieni PD, Mathews C, Wiggins CL, Robertson M, McDonald YJ, et al. Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: a population‐based case–control study in the United States. International Journal of Cancer. 2020; 147: 887–896.

[6] Aimagambetova G, Atageldiyeva K, Marat A, Suleimenova A, Issa T, Raman S, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus detection: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2024; 38: 102590.

[7] Arbyn M, Smith SB, Temin S, Sultana F, Castle P, Collaboration on S-S, et al. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses. The BMJ. 2018; 363: k4823.

[8] Witteman HO, Maki KG, Vaisson G, Finderup J, Lewis KB, Dahl Steffensen K, et al. Systematic development of patient decision aids: an update from the IPDAS collaboration. Medical Decision Making. 2021; 41: 736–754.

[9] Witteman HO, Vaisson G, Provencher T, Chipenda Dansokho S, Colquhoun H, Dugas M, et al. An 11-item measure of user- and human-centered design for personal health tools (UCD-11): development and validation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021; 23: e15032.

[10] Butler TL, Lee N, Anderson K, Brotherton JML, Cunningham J, Condon JR, et al. Under-screened aboriginal and Torres strait islander women’s perspectives on cervical screening. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0271658.

[11] Creagh NS, Zammit C, Brotherton JM, Saville M, McDermott T, Nightingale C, et al. The experience of under-screened and never-screened participants using clinician-supported self-collection cervical screening within the Australian National Cervical Screening Program. Women’s Health. 2022; 18: 17455065221075905.

[12] Chadwick V, Bennett KF, McCaffery KJ, Brotherton JML, Dodd RH. Psychosocial impact of testing human papillomavirus positive in Australia’s human papillomavirus-based cervical screening program: a cross‐sectional survey. Psycho-Oncology. 2022; 31: 1110–1119.

[13] Lopez-Olivo MA, Suarez-Almazor ME. Digital patient education and decision aids. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 2019; 45: 245–256.

[14] Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 4: CD001431.

[15] Canfell K, Smith M, Saville M, Arbyn M. HPV screening for cervical cancer is reaching maturity. The BMJ. 2022; 377: o1303.

[16] Waller J, Waite F, Marlow L. Awareness and knowledge about HPV and primary HPV screening among women in Great Britain: an online population-based survey. To be published in Journal of Medical Screening. 2023. [Preprint].


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top