Article Data

  • Views 274
  • Dowloads 110

Editorials

Open Access

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of cervical cancer. A long and winding road. State of the art

  • Alejandro Soderini1,*,
  • Noel Baca1
  • Florencia Agostina Arrudi1
  • Ignacio Manuel Macció1
  • Alejandro Aragona1

1Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship, University of Buenos Aires, Marie Curie Oncology Hospital, 1424 Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.111 Vol.45,Issue 6,December 2024 pp.1-4

Submitted: 19 June 2024 Accepted: 10 July 2024

Published: 15 December 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Alejandro Soderini E-mail: asoderini@fmed.uba.ar

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radical surgery


Cite and Share

Alejandro Soderini,Noel Baca,Florencia Agostina Arrudi,Ignacio Manuel Macció,Alejandro Aragona. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of cervical cancer. A long and winding road. State of the art. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(6);1-4.

References

[1] Soderini A, Aragona A, CuneoN. The problem of cervical cancer. Actual Experiences in Gynecology Oncology (pp. 25–30). 3rd edn. Ascune Editors: Buenos Aires. 2024.

[2] Soderini A, Reyes C. Module 3: chapter 16. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix. E-Book textbook of Gynecology Oncology (pp. 60–74). 1st edn. Ascune Editors: Buenos Aires. 2020.

[3] Aragona A, Soderini A, Moschen H, Bonavia E, Garrido R, Cúneo N. High mortality for cervical cancer in young women from the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires. Medicina. 2018; 78: 234–242.

[4] Soderini A. The cervical cancer. Handbook of practical management guidelines of genital and breast cancer (pp. 63–74). 1st end. Ascune Editors: Buenos Aires. 2022.

[5] Sardi JE, Giaroli A, Sananes C, Ferreira M, Soderini A, Bermúdez A, et al. Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: the final results. Gynecologic Oncology. 1997; 67: 61–69.

[6] Pecorelli S, Odicino F. Cervical cancer staging. The Cancer Journal. 2003; 9: 390–394.

[7] Sardi J E, Sananes CE, Giaroli AI, Bermudez A, Ferreira MH, Soderini AH, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma stage IIB: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 1998; 8: 441–450.

[8] Sardi J, Giaroli A, Sananes C, Rueda NG, Vighi S, Ferreira M, et al. Randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIB squamous carcinoma cervix uteri: an unexpected therapeutic management. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 1996; 6: 85–93.

[9] Etcheverry MG, Marantz AT, Saine M, Litovska ST, Lewi DT, Cecchin G, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2000; 10: 53–58.

[10] Chang TC, Lai CH, Hong JH, Hsueh S, Huang KG, Chou HH, et al. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin, and radical hysterectomy versus radiationtherapy for bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000; 18: 1740–1747.

[11] Benedetti-Panici P, Greggi S, Colombo A, Amoroso M, Smaniotto D, Giannarelli D, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2002; 20: 179–188.

[12] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer meta-analysis collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. European Journal of Cancer. 2003; 39: 2470–2486.

[13] Choi YS, Sin JI, Kim JH, Ye GW, Shin IH, Lee TS. Survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy in locally advanced chemoresistant cervical cancer. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2006; 21: 683–689.

[14] Guo L, Liu X, Wang L, Sun H, Huang K, Li X, et al. Outcome of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIB cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2015; 25: 910–918.

[15] Rydzewska L, Tierney J, Vale CL, Symonds PR. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010; 20: CD007406.

[16] Kim HS, Sardi JE, Katsumata N, Ryu HS, Nam JH, Chung HH, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: an international collaborative meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2013; 39: 115–124.

[17] Chou HH, Huang HJ, Lin H, Yang LY, Hsueh S, Liu FY, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by radical hysterectomy in stages IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017; 40: 241–249.

[18] Zanaboni F, Grijuela B, Giudici S, Cormio G, Babilonti L, Ghezzi F, et al. Weekly topotecan and cisplatin (TOPOCIS) as neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for locally-advanced squamous cervical carcinoma: results of a phase II multicentric study. European Journal of Cancer. 2013; 49: 1065–1072.

[19] Benedetti PP, Palaia I, Marchetti C, Ruscito I, Fischetti M, Musella A, et al. Dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: a phase II study. Oncology. 2015; 89: 103–110.

[20] Chuang L, Feldman S, Nam Joo-Hyun, Thomas G, Bereck J. SGO-ASCO new clinical practice guideline. 2016. Available at: www.asco.org (Accessed: 02 June 2016).

[21] Kenter GG, Greggi S, Vergote I, Katsaros D, Kobierski J, van Doorn H, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiation in stage IB2–IIB cervical cancer: EORTC-55994. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023; 10: 5503–5503.

[22] Sardi J, Sananes C, Giaroli A, Gomez Rueda N, Di Paola G, Vighi S, et al. Is subradical surgical treatment for carcinoma of the cervix uteri stage IB logical? Gynecologic Oncology. 1989; 32: 360–364.

[23] Ferreyra M, Soderini A, Sardi J. Subradical treatment for carcinoma of the cervix IB, Dogma or utopia? European School of Oncology in the First Latin-American Educational Convention. ESO: Buenos Aires. 1995.

[24] Landoni F, Parma G, Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Sideri M, Colombo N, et al. Chemo-conization in early cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2007; 107: S125–S126.

[25] Lanowska M, Mangler M, Speiser D, Bockholdt C, Schneider A, Köhler C, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy after laparoscopic after laparoscopic staging and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with early stage cervical cancer over 2 cm: oncologic, fertility and neonatal outcome in a series of 20 patients. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014; 24: 586–593.

[26] Plante M. Bulky early-stage cervical cancer (2–4 cm lesions): upfront radical trachelectomy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-preserving surgery: which is the best option? International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2015; 25: 722–728.

[27] Soderini A, Aragona A, Bonavia E, Moschen H, Mendez M, Garrido R, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCH) followed by abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) in cervical cancer: long term follow up results of the Buenos Aires experience. Journal of Advanced Surgical Research. 2017; 1: 7–12.

[28] Rendón GJ, Lopez Blanco A, Aragona A, Saadi JM, Di Guilmi J, Arab Eblen C, et al. Oncological and obstetrical outcomes after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer ≥2 cm. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2021; 31: 462–467.

[29] Soderini A, Giaroli A, Sananes C, Anchezar JP, Alessandría S, Sardi J. Nowadays in pelvic exenterations (PE). Long term follow-up. The Buenos Aires experience. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2004; 14: 54.

[30] Benedetti Panici P, Bellati F, Manci N, Pernice M, Plotti F, Di Donato V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in patients affected by FIGO stage IVA cervical cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2007; 14: 2643–2648.

[31] Landoni F, Zanagnolo V, Rosenberg PG, Lopes A, Radice D, Bocciolone L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to pelvic exenteration in patients with recurrent cervical cancer: single institution experience. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 130: 69–74.

[32] Angioli R, Soderini A, Plotti F, Damiani P, Montera R, Capriglione S, et al. Surgical primary treatment of stage IVA cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 125: S52.

[33] Sananes C, Giaroli A, Soderini A, Guardado N, Snaidas L, Bermudez A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and postoperative adjuvantchemotherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix uteri: long-term follow-up of a pilot study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 1998; 19: 368–373.

[34] Angioli R, Plotti F, Montera R, Aloisi A, Luvero D, Capriglione S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery followed by chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecologic oncology. 2012; 127: 290–296.

[35] McCormack M, Kadalayil L, Hackshaw A, Hall-Craggs MA, Symonds RP, Warwick V, et al. A phase II study ofweekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 201; 108: 2464–2469.

[36] McCormack M, Gallardo Rincón D, Eminowicz G, Diez P, Farrelly L, Kent C, et al. LBA8 A randomised phase III trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: the GCIG INTERLACE trial. Annals of Oncology. 2023; 34: S1254–S1335.

[37] Soderini A, Aragona A, Quintaie A, Moschen H, Mendez M. Prognostic significance of the Central Tumor Size (CTS) in Cervical Cancer (CC) stages IIb and IIIb: what should we do with the FIGO staging system and therapeutic strategies? Archives of Cancer Science and Therapy. 2021; 5: 002–005.

[38] Depietri V, Aragona A, Crespe M, Soderini A. Stages of cervical cancer at the first appoiment in a public oncologic hospital of the city of Buenos Aires: period 2019–2022, from normality to pandemia. Revista SOGBA. 2023; 54: 20–43. (In Spanish)

[39] Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2018; 2: 22–36. Erratum in: International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2024; 164: 1229–1230.

[40] Spreafico A, Sultanem K, Chen B, Bratman SV, Ringash J, Louie AV, et al. A randomized phase II study of cisplatin plus radiotherapy versus durvalumab plus radiotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab versus durvalumab plus radiotherapy followed by Adjuvant tremelimumab and durvalumab in intermediate risk HPV-positive. Locoregionally Advanced Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer. 2018; 29: viii399.

[41] Fracasso PM, Duska LR, Thaker PH, Gao F, Zoberi I, Dehdashti F, et al. An exploratory study of neoadjuvant cetuximab followed by cetuximab and chemoradiotherapy in women with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022; 45: 286–293.

[42] Soderini A, Montera R, Aragona A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer: from yesterday to today. International Gynecologic Cancer Society Annual Meeting. 2019. Available at: www.ijgc.org/www.igcs.org/ (Accessed: 19 September 2019).

[43] Cervical cancer. NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) clinical practice guidelines in oncology. 2021. Available at: www.nccn.org (Accessed: 26 October 2021).


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top