Article Data

  • Views 336
  • Dowloads 111

Original Research

Open Access

Application of transumbilical paring and retrieving techniques in laparoscopic myomectomy

  • Wei Kong1,*,†,
  • Guangwu Xiong2,†
  • Peng Guo3
  • Xue Li1
  • Li Shen1
  • Li Yang1
  • Huicheng Xu1
  • Jingbo Wang1

1Guiqian International General Hospital, 550018 Guiyang, Guizhou, China

2Peking University International Hospital, 102206 Beijing, China

3Anshun City People’s Hospital, 561099 Anshun, Guizhou, China

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.079 Vol.45,Issue 4,August 2024 pp.139-144

Submitted: 22 June 2022 Accepted: 31 August 2022

Published: 15 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Wei Kong E-mail: kongwei.cq@foxmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of transumbilical paring and retrieving techniques (TPRT) in conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). From July 2020 to October 2021, TPRT, based on transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS), was applied to 111 cases of conventional laparoscopic myomectomy. The operation procedures included routine conventional laparoscopic myomectomy and uterine suture, placement of the endoscopic bag, tumor bagging, umbilical incision, paring and retrieving the tumor, and repairing the umbilical incision. Under direct vision, the tumor in the specimen bag was removed by clamping, pulling and reducing through the umbilical incision. All operations were successfully completed. The average number of leiomyomas removed was 1.94 (range, 1–11), and the mean tumor weight was 155.45 g (range, 40–665 g). The mean total tumor removal time, from endoscopic bag placement to umbilical incision repair, was 12.60 min (range, 6–28 min). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated on postoperatively day 1 was 2.59 (range, 1–4). Most of the removed lesions were diagnosed as benign leiomyoma on postoperative pathology, and no malignancy was observed in any resected samples. All cases were followed up through outpatient visits or telephone, and the average follow-up time was 7.55 months (range, 1–16 months). The umbilical incisions healed without complications, and there were no complaints of umbilical discomfort.TPRT was found to be safe, time-saving, cost-efficient, and easy to perform and learn.


Keywords

Laparoscopy; Myomectomy; Umbilical incision; Leiomyoma; Transumbilical paring and retrieving techniques; Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery


Cite and Share

Wei Kong,Guangwu Xiong,Peng Guo,Xue Li,Li Shen,Li Yang,Huicheng Xu,Jingbo Wang. Application of transumbilical paring and retrieving techniques in laparoscopic myomectomy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(4);139-144.

References

[1] Aksoy H, Aydin T, Özdamar Ö, Karadag ÖI, Aksoy U. Successful use of laparoscopic myomectomy to remove a giant uterine myoma: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2015; 9: 286.

[2] Sun Dawei. Expert opinion on single-hole laparoscopic surgery in gynecology. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; 724–726. (In Chinese)

[3] Sun Xuejie, Han Lu. Parasitic leiomyoma after laparoscopic myomectomy: a report of 2 cases and literature review. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2018; 18: 955–957. (In Chinese)

[4] Steiner R A, Wight E, Tadir Y, Haller U. Electrical cutting device for laparoscopic removal of tissue from the abdominal cavity. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1993; 81: 471–474.

[5] Denschlag D, Ackermann S, Battista MJ, Cremer W, Egerer G, Follmann M, et al. Sarcoma of the uterus. Guideline of the DGGG and OEGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Register Number 015/074, February 2019). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2019; 79: 1043–1060.

[6] Wu Haijing, Zhang Guonan. Research progress of peritoneal disseminated leiomyomatosis. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 50: 232–234. (In Chinese)

[7] Lang Jinghe, Zhang Guonan, Xiang Yang, Di Wen, Li Xiaoping, Yang Xingsheng, et al. Consensus of Chinese experts on laparoscopic uterine (myoma) fragmentation. Chinese Journal of practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020; 36: 626–632. (In Chinese)

[8] Halaska M J, Haidopoulos D, Guyon F, Morice P, Zapardiel I, Kesic V; ESGO Council. European society of gynecological oncology statement on fibroid and uterine morcellation. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2017; 27: 189–192.

[9] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. UPDATE: The FDA recommends performing contained morcellation in women when laparoscopic power morcellation is appropriate [EB/OL]. 2020. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/surgery-devices/laparoscopic-power-morcellators (Accessed: 09 March 2023).

[10] Wang Xiaoying, Li Yan. Modified transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic myomectomy. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2019; 19: 919–921. (In Chinese)

[11] Liu Gaoyan, Ma Qinglian, Liu Peng. Application of transvaginal apple peeling in laparoscopic total hysterectomy. Medical Clinical Research. 2015; 32: 1739–1741. (In Chinese)

[12] Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS. The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95: 2204–2208.e3.

[13] Moon HS, Jeong K, Lee SR. Robotic-assisted single incision myomectomy in large myoma cases. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017; 44: 283–287.

[14] Peker N, Gündoğan S, Şendağ F. Laparoscopic management of huge myoma nascendi. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2017; 24: 347–348.

[15] Song JY. Laparoscopic resection of a rare, large broad ligament myoma. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015; 22: 530–531.

[16] Liu Fujun. Dissemination and prevention of tissue comminution in laparoscopic hysteromyoma surgery. Study on Cancer Prevention and Teatment. 2017; 44: 627–630. (In Chinese)

[17] Steller C, Cholkeri-Singh A, Sasaki K, Miller CE. Power morcellation using a contained bag system. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2017; 21: e2016.00095.

[18] Serur E, Zambrano N, Brown K, Clemetson E, Lakhi N. Extracorporeal manual morcellation of very large uteri within an enclosed endoscopic bag: our 5-year experience. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016; 23: 903–908.

[19] Mowers EL, Skinner B, McLean K, Reynolds RK. Effects of morcellation of uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential and endometrial stromal sarcoma: case series and recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015; 22: 601–606.

[20] Shi Yu, Liu Hong, Zhang Guonan, Huang Jing, Wang Dengfeng, Shi Xunwei, et al. Analysis of the efficacy and safety of disposable endoscopic specimen bag in laparoscopic uterine (myoma) fragmentation. Tumor Prevention and Treatment. 2020; 33: 395–400. (In Chinese)

[21] Park J, Kim T, Kang H, Lee Y, Choi CH, Lee J, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (less) surgery in benign gynecology: perioperative and late complications of 515 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2013; 167: 215–218.

[22] Ma Yingchun, Guan Xiaoming. Application of robotic single port laparoscopic surgery in the field of gynecology. Obstetrics-Gynecology and Genetics. 2015; 44–47.

[23] Gao Jinghai, Jin Zhijun, Li Junping, Zhang Yujiao, Xu Bingxue, Liu Xiaojun. Robot-assisted transumbilical single port laparoscopy in the treatment of cervical invasive carcinoma: clinical analysis of 12 cases. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2019; 35: 797–800. (In Chinese)

[24] Lv Xiaohui, Guo Xin, Li Jia, Li Lingxia, Yang Hong, Zou Wei, et al. Primary study on robotic single-site laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery. 2019; 12: 154–158.

[25] Zhang Y, Kohn J R, Guan X. Single-incision hysterectomy outcomes with and without robotic assistance. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2019; 23: e2019.00046.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top