Article Data

  • Views 337
  • Dowloads 136

Original Research

Open Access

Mismatch repair proteins evaluation in endometrial carcinoma: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications

  • Samah Saharti1,*,
  • Fadwa Altaf1

1Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University and King Abdulaziz University Hospital, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.076 Vol.45,Issue 4,August 2024 pp.118-124

Submitted: 07 December 2023 Accepted: 01 February 2024

Published: 15 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Samah Saharti E-mail: SNSaharti@kau.edu.sa

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent cancer affecting women worldwide. Mismatch repair proteins (MMR) play a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability and preventing the accumulation of mutations. The evaluation of MMR proteins can aid in the identification of mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors, which have distinct clinicopathological features and prognostic implications. This study aims to analyze the expression of MMR proteins in a cohort of 96 endometrial carcinoma cases collected from the pathology department archive at a tertiary center between 2010 and 2022. Of the 96 cases, 36 were classified as MMRd, which encompassed various subtypes, including endometrioid, mixed mullerian tumor (MMMT), and papillary serous carcinoma. The MMRd tumors exhibited distinct histopathological characteristics, such as low-grade differentiation and lymphoepithelioma-like patterns. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed paired loss of MLH1 and PMS2 in the majority of cases, while loss of MSH2 and MSH6 was observed in a smaller subset. Additionally, in a subset of patients had a familial history of cancer, indicating potential hereditary factors contributing to MMRd. In terms of prognostic markers, MMRd tumors exhibited higher rates of Estrogen Receptor (ER)/Progestron Receptor (PR) positivity and wild type p53 staining. Overall, our findings suggest that the evaluation of MMR proteins in endometrial carcinoma can provide valuable insights into the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of MMRd tumors.


Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Mismatch repair proteins; Clinicopathological characteristics; MMR-deficient tumors; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis


Cite and Share

Samah Saharti,Fadwa Altaf. Mismatch repair proteins evaluation in endometrial carcinoma: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(4);118-124.

References

[1] World Cancer Research Fund International. Endometrial cancer statistics. 2018. Available at: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/endometrial-cancer-statistics (Accessed: 01 December 2023).

[2] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018; 68: 394–424.

[3] Cancer Incidence Report in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2020. Saudi Health Council. National Cancer Center. Saudi Cancer Registry. 2020. Available at: https://shc.gov.sa/Arabic/NCC/Activities/AnnualReports/Cancer%20Incidence%20Report%202020.pdf (Accessed: 01 December 2023).

[4] Alghamdi IG, Hussain II, Alghamdi MS, El-Sheemy MA. The incidence rate of corpus uteri cancer among females in Saudi Arabia: an observational descriptive epidemiological analysis of data from Saudi Cancer Registry 2001–2008. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2014; 6: 141–147.

[5] Bazarbashi SN, Al Eid HS, Minguet J, Smith C. Patterns of practice of endometrial cancer in Saudi Arabia: a national population-based cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2014: 40: 1357–1364.

[6] Al-Raddadi RM, Alfawaz H, Alturki R, Aljaser M. Obesity in Saudi Arabia: prevalence, risk factors, and treatment options. Saudi Journal of Obesity. 2021; 9: 3–14.

[7] Aarnio M, Sankila R, Pukkala E, Salovaara R, Aaltonen LA, de la Chapelle A, et al. Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. International Journal of Cancer. 1999; 81: 214–218.

[8] Kunkel TA, Erie DA. DNA mismatch repair. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2005; 74: 681–710.

[9] Peltomäki P, Vasen H. Mutations Associated with HNPCC Predisposition—update of ICG-HNPCC/insight mutation database. Disease Markers. 2004; 20: 269–276.

[10] Hampel H, Frankel WL, Martin E, Arnold M, Khanduja K, Kuebler P, et al. Screening for the lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 352: 1851–1860.

[11] Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram‐Baptiste D, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018; 68: 297–316.

[12] Bell DW, Gore I, Okimoto RA, Godin-Heymann N, Sordella R, Mulloy R, et al. Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer may be associated with the T790M drug resistance mutation in EGFR. Nature Genetics. 2005; 37: 1315–1316.

[13] Lynch H, Lynch P, Lanspa S, Snyder C, Lynch J, Boland C. Review of the lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clinical Genetics. 2009; 76: 1–18.

[14] Gordhandas S, Kahn RM, Gamble C, Talukdar N, Maddy B, Baltich Nelson B, et al. Clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer with mismatch repair deficiency. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020; 14: 1061.

[15] Atjimakul T, Wattanapaisal P, Suwiwat S, Wanichsuwan W, Hanprasertpong J. Microsatellite instability and oncological outcomes in Thai patients with endometrial cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2022; 42: 3117–3123.

[16] Manning-Geist BL, Liu YL, Devereaux KA, Paula ADC, Zhou QC, Ma W, et al. Microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancers with mlh1 promoter hypermethylation have distinct molecular and clinical profiles. Clinical Cancer Research. 2022; 28: 4302–4311.

[17] Jain E, Prasad S, Dhar A, Kini L, Sharma S, Dewan A. The utility of evaluating mismatch repair proteins in endometrial carcinoma: an experience from a tertiary referral centre in North India. Pathologica. 2021; 113: 115–120.

[18] Rekhi B, Menon S, Deodhar KK, Ghosh J, Chopra S, Maheshwari A. Clinicopathological features of 50 mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinomas, tested by immunohistochemistry: a single institutional feasibility study, India. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 2020; 47: 151558.

[19] Bu R, Siraj AK, Parvathareddy SK, Iqbal K, Azam S, Qadri Z, et al. Lynch syndrome identification in Saudi cohort of endometrial cancer patients screened by universal approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 12299.

[20] Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, Silverberg S, Lim PC, Burke JJ, et al. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Cancer. 2006; 106: 812–819.

[21] Kanopiene D, Vidugiriene J, Povilas Valuckas K, Smailyte G, Uleckiene S, Bacher J. Endometrial cancer and microsatellite instability status. Open medicine. 2014; 10: 70–76.

[22] An HJ, Kim KI, Kim JY, Shim JY, Kang H, Kim TH, et al. Microsatellite instability in endometrioid type endometrial adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognostic indicators. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2007; 31: 846–853.

[23] Loukovaara M, Pasanen A, Bützow R. Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in molecularly classified endometrial carcinoma. Cancers. 2021; 13: 3124.

[24] Noh JJ, Kim MK, Choi MC, Lee J, Park H, Jung SG, et al. Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency/high microsatellite instability and its role as a predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2022; 54: 1200–1208.

[25] Conlon N, Da Cruz Paula A, Ashley CW, Segura S, De Brot L, da Silva EM, et al. Endometrial carcinomas with a “serous” component in young women are enriched for DNA mismatch repair deficiency, lynch syndrome, and POLE exonuclease domain mutations. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2020; 44: 641–648.

[26] Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Enomoto T, et al. Uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 162: 226–234.

[27] Le Gallo M, Rudd ML, Urick ME, Hansen NF, Zhang S, Lozy F, et al. Somatic mutation profiles of clear cell endometrial tumors revealed by whole exome and targeted gene sequencing. Cancer. 2017; 123: 3261–3268.

[28] DeLair DF, Burke KA, Selenica P, Lim RS, Scott SN, Middha S, et al. The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas. The Journal of Pathology. 2017; 243: 230–241.

[29] De Leo A, Ravegnini G, Musiani F, Maloberti T, Visani M, Sanza V, et al. Relevance of ARID1A mutations in endometrial carcinomas. Diagnostics. 2022; 12: 592.

[30] Yoshida H, Takigawa W, Kobayashi-Kato M, Nishikawa T, Shiraishi K, Ishikawa M. Mismatch repair protein expression in endometrial cancer: assessing concordance and unveiling pitfalls in two different immunohistochemistry assays. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13: 1260.

[31] Wang C, Tran DA, Fu MZ, Chen W, Fu SW, Li X. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and her2 receptor markers in endometrial cancer. Journal of Cancer. 2020; 11: 1693–1701.

[32] Zhao P, Li L, Jiang X, Li Q. Mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability-high as a predictor for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2019; 12: 54.

[33] Musacchio L, Boccia SM, Caruso G, Santangelo G, Fischetti M, Tomao F, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: a promising choice for endometrial cancer patients? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9: 1721.

[34] Zhang G, Chen H, Liu Y, Niu L, Jin L, Li D, et al. Is lymph node dissection mandatory among early-stage endometrial cancer patients? A retrospective study. BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20: 258.

[35] Yen TT, Wang TL, Fader AN, Shih IM, Gaillard S. Molecular classification and emerging targeted therapy in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2020; 39: 26–35.

[36] Makker V, Green AK, Wenham RM, Mutch D, Davidson B, Miller DS. New therapies for advanced, recurrent, and metastatic endometrial cancers. Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice. 2017; 4: 19.

[37] Kanopiene D, Vidugiriene J, Valuckas KP, Smailyte G, Uleckiene S, Bacher J. Endometrial cancer and microsatellite instability status. Open Medicine. 2014; 10: 70–76.

[38] Fountzilas E, Kotoula V, Pentheroudakis G, Manousou K, Polychronidou G, Vrettou E, et al. Prognostic implications of mismatch repair deficiency in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer. ESMO Open. 2019; 4: e000474.

[39] de Freitas D, Aguiar FN, Anton C, de Almeida DC, Bacchi CE, Carvalho JP, Carvalho FM. Clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial carcinomas according to DNA mismatch repair protein status. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e17495.

[40] Kim JH, Kwon BS, Kim H, Suh DH, Kim K, Kim YB, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of DNA mismatch repair protein status in endometrial cancer. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 61: 415–421.

[41] Kurnit KC, Westin SN, Coleman RL. Microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer: new purpose for an old test. Cancer. 2019; 125: 2154–2163.

[42] He Y, Tao X, Huang F, Jia N, Du Y, Yu J, Feng W. Clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer in Chinese patients younger than 50 years with a family history of cancer. Medicine. 2018; 97: e12968.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top