Article Data

  • Views 326
  • Dowloads 132

Original Research

Open Access

PD-L1 in a South African cohort of endometrial carcinomas: directions for the future

  • Reubina Wadee1,*,
  • Innocent Maposa2

1Department of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand/National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS), 2193 Johannesburg, South Africa

2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, 7505 Cape Town, South Africa

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.074 Vol.45,Issue 4,August 2024 pp.100-109

Submitted: 17 October 2023 Accepted: 21 November 2023

Published: 15 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Reubina Wadee E-mail: reubina.wadee@nhls.ac.za; reubinawadee@gmail.com

Abstract

The Programmed Death-1(PD-1)/Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway is the focus of numerous clinical trials on various tumours using immunotherapy. Endometrial tumours with Polymerase E gene mutations and microsatellite unstable neoplasms have demonstrated strong immune responses against mutationally associated neoantigens, with favourable results using immune checkpoint inhibitors. We assessed PD-L1 on endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) in South Africa’s state hospital sector, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been investigated. We performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry on 145 EECs and compared PD-L1 status to our data on cases that had previously undergone mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability assessment by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and methylation analysis. PD-L1 was expressed in 13.1% (19/145) of EECs, of which, 7 (36.8%) showed MMR deficiency. There was MMR deficiency in 26.9% (34/126) of PD-L1 negative cases (p = 0.37). There were 47.4% (9/19) microsatellite unstable PD-L1 positive cases whereas 52.6% (10/19) of PD-L1 positive cases were microsatellite stable by PCR (p = 0.23). From the PD-L1 positive cases that underwent methylation testing, 80% (8/10) were methylated and 20% (2/10) were unmethylated (p = 0.54). Compared to a Jordanian study and a Chinese study, on populations also not extensively investigated, our study demonstrated lower PD-L1 expression (p = 0.0170; p-value < 0.001 respectively). Our study showed that approximately two-thirds of cases were MMR proficient, which is more than twice the accepted published number of PD-L1 positive cases with MMR staining. This suggests that in our population PD-L1 staining should be considered in all EECs to identify cases that may derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. It is envisioned that this study may provide the impetus for future possible immune therapies for endometrial cancer patients in the state sector of South Africa. Our study provides data from a developing country which adds to current global data.


Keywords

PD-L1; Endometrial carcinoma; South Africa


Cite and Share

Reubina Wadee,Innocent Maposa. PD-L1 in a South African cohort of endometrial carcinomas: directions for the future. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(4);100-109.

References

[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.

[2] GLOBOCAN 2020: New Global Cancer Data. 2020. Available at: https://www.uicc.org/news/globocan-2020-new-global-cancer-data (Accessed: 14 April 2021).

[3] South African National Cancer Registry. Cancer in South Africa (2019) Johannesburg. 2019. Available at: https://www.nicd.ac.za/centres/national-cancer-registry/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).

[4] South African National Cancer Registry. Cancer in South Africa (2013) Johannesburg. 2013. Available at: https://www.nicd.ac.za/centres/national-cancer-registry/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).

[5] The South African National Cancer Registry. Cancer in South Africa (2014) Johannesburg. 2014. Available at: https://www.nicd.ac.za/centres/national-cancer-registry/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).

[6] South African National Cancer Registry. National cancer registry: cancer in south Africa. 2016. Available at: https://www.nicd.ac.za/centres/national-cancer-registry/ (Accessed: 18 December 2023).

[7] Wadee R, Grayson W. Identification of possible Lynch syndrome in endometrial carcinomas at a public hospital in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020; 12: 6–12.

[8] Luomaranta A, Leminen A, Loukovaara M. Prediction of lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a new model based on demographics, biochemical factors, and tumor histology. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 129: 28–32.

[9] Woo YL, Cheah PL, Shahruddin SI, Omar SZ, Arends M. The immunohistochemistry signature of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in a multiethnic Asian cohort with endometrial carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2014; 33: 554–559.

[10] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, Shen H, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013; 497: 67–73.

[11] Matias-Guiu X, Longacre T, McGluccage W, Nucci M, Oliva E. Tumours of the uterine corpus: introduction. World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours 5th edition, Female Genital Tumours, World Health Organization. IARC Press: Lyon. 2020.

[12] Crumley S, Kurnit K, Hudgens C, Fellman B, Tetzlaff MT, Broaddus R. Identification of a subset of microsatellite-stable endometrial carcinoma with high PD-L1 and CD8+ lymphocytes. Modern Pathology. 2019; 32: 396–404.

[13] Yen T, Wang T, Fader AN, Shih I, Gaillard S. Molecular classification and emerging targeted therapy in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2020; 39: 26–35.

[14] Cao W, Ma X, Fischer JV, Sun C, Kong B, Zhang Q. Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: rationale, practice and perspectives. Biomarker Research. 2021; 9: 49.

[15] Lu L, Li Y, Luo R, Xu J, Feng J, Wang M. Prognostic and clinicopathological role of PD-L1 in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020; 10: 632.

[16] Han Y, Liu D, Li L. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2020; 10: 727–742.

[17] Mo Z, Liu J, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Mei J, Liu L, et al. Expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 is associated with differentiation status and histological type of endometrial cancer. Oncology Letters. 2016; 12: 944–950.

[18] Heong V, Ngoi N, Tan DSP. Update on immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 28: e20.

[19] O’Malley DM, Bariani GM, Cassier PA, Marabelle A, Hansen AR, De Jesus Acosta A, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability—high advanced endometrial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022; 40: 752–761.

[20] Engerud H, Berg HF, Myrvold M, Halle MK, Bjorge L, Haldorsen IS, et al. High degree of heterogeneity of PD-L1 and PD-1 from primary to metastatic endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2020; 157: 260–267.

[21] Kir G, Soylemez T, Olgun ZC, Aydin A, McCluggage WG. Correlation of PD-L1 expression with immunohistochemically determined molecular profile in endometrial carcinomas. Virchows Archiv. 2020; 477: 845–856.

[22] Wadee and Grayson. Immunohistochemical mismatch repair deficiency versus PCR microsatellite instability: a tale of two methodologies in endometrial carcinomas. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020; 41: 952–959.

[23] PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx instructions for use n.d. Available at: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/packageinsert/public/Copy%20of%20PD00920EN_01.pdf (Accessed: 18 December 2023).

[24] Suchiman HED, Slieker RC, Kremer D, Slagboom PE, Heijmans BT, Tobi EW. Design, measurement and processing of region-specific DNA methylation assays: the mass spectrometry-based method EpiTYPER. Frontiers in Genetics. 2015; 6: 287.

[25] Ott PA, Bang Y, Berton-Rigaud D, Elez E, Pishvaian MJ, Rugo HS, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in advanced programmed death ligand 1—positive endometrial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-028 study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2018; 73: 26–27.

[26] Amarin JZ, Mansour R, Al-Ghnimat S, Al-Hussaini M. Differential characteristics and prognosis of PD-L1—positive endometrial carcinomas: a retrospective chart review. Life. 2021; 11: 1047.

[27] Zong L, Sun Z, Mo S, Lu Z, Yu S, Xiang Y, et al. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 162: 631–637.

[28] Oaknin A. Endometrial cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. 2022. Available at: https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/guidelines-by-topic/gynaecological-cancers/endometrial-cancer (Accessed: 27 April 2023).

[29] Kir G, Olgun ZC, Soylemez T, Aydin A, Demircan B, Kaya IA, et al. PD-L1 expression in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial carcinoma and tumor-associated immune cells: differences between MLH1 methylated and nonmethylated subgroups. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 2021; 40: 575–586.

[30] Cho YA, Lee H, Kim DG, Kim H, Ha SY, Choi Y-L, et al. PD-L1 expression is significantly associated with tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability score. Cancers. 2021; 13: 4659.

[31] Mamat Yusof MN, Chew KT, Kampan NC, Shafiee MN. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in endometrial cancer: molecular and clinical significance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 15233.

[32] Li Z, Joehlin-Price AS, Rhoades J, Ayoola-Adeola M, Miller K, Parwani AV, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression among 700 consecutive endometrial cancers: strong association with mismatch repair protein deficiency. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2018; 28: 59–68.

[33] Mahdy H, Casey MJ, Crotzer D. Endometrial cancer. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[34] Lax SF, Kurman RJ, Pizer ES, Wu L, Ronnett BM. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2000; 24: 1201–1208.

[35] Hashmi AA, Ali R, Hussain ZF, Faridi N, Khan EY, Bakar SMA, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency screening in colorectal carcinoma by a four-antibody immunohistochemical panel in Pakistani population and its correlation with histopathological parameters. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2017; 15: 116.

[36] Bosch DE, Yeh MM, Salipante SJ, Jacobson A, Cohen SA, Konnick EQ, et al. Isolated MLH1 loss by immunohistochemistry because of benign germline MLH1 polymorphisms. JCO Precision Oncology. 2022; 6: e2200227.

[37] Liu S, Gӧnen M, Stadler ZK, Weiser MR, Hechtman JF, Vakiani E, et al. Cellular localization of PD-L1 expression in mismatch-repair-deficient and proficient colorectal carcinomas. Modern Pathology. 2019; 32: 110–121.

[38] Pasanen A, Loukovaara M, Ahvenainen T, Vahteristo P, Bützow R. Differential impact of clinicopathological risk factors within the 2 largest ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16: e0253472.

[39] Siraj AK, Parvathareddy SK, Annaiyappanaidu P, Haqawi W, Al-Rasheed M, AlManea HM, et al. PD-L1 expression is associated with deficient mismatch repair and poor prognosis in middle eastern colorectal cancers. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021; 11: 73.

[40] Yu H, Boyle TA, Zhou C, Rimm DL, Hirsch FR. PD-L1 expression in lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2016; 11: 964–975.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top