Article Data

  • Views 324
  • Dowloads 128

Original Research

Open Access

Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of stage IVB endometrial adenocarcinoma

  • Adam C. ElNaggar1
  • Robert Neff2
  • Marilly Palettas3
  • Samara Pollock4
  • Michael Ulm1
  • Joann Gold5,*,
  • Naixin Zhang5
  • Todd D. Tillmanns1
  • David Cohn4

1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Memphis, TN 38138, USA

2Division of Gynecologic Oncology, TriHealth Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA

3Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

4Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38103, USA

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.067 Vol.45,Issue 4,August 2024 pp.50-57

Submitted: 17 September 2023 Accepted: 20 October 2023

Published: 15 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Joann Gold E-mail: jgold7@uthsc.edu

Abstract

Treatment for stage IVB endometrial adenocarcinoma is multimodal. Our objective is to evaluate the utility of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on survival outcomes for patients with stage IVB endometrial adenocarcinoma. A multi-institutional retrospective review was completed of patients from 1996 to 2018. Descriptive analyses compared baseline characteristics of the treatment groups. A two-sample test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the distribution of values. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. Ninety-nine patients with stage IVB endometrial adenocarcinoma who received NAT (n = 35) or primary debulking surgery (PDS) (n = 64) were included for analysis. There was no difference in residual disease between those undergoing PDS or NAT. Interval debulking was performed in 68.6%of patients receiving NAT. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1–10) of platinum-based NAT. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) for those receiving NAT compared to PDS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.59; 0.98, 2.59) or overall survival (OS) (age adjusted HR = 1.70; 1.00, 2.88). Patients who received NAT but did not proceed to surgery (IDS) were at a higher risk of death compared to those that had surgery (aHR = 2.96; 1.43, 6.16). The role of surgery was largely negated if adjuvant therapy was not administered. Patients with stage IVB endometrial cancer can receive NAT without compromising median PFS or OS. The survival differences in patients that received only primary chemotherapy or chemoradiation points to the importance of surgery. Similarly, when electing for surgery the ability to receive adjuvant therapy is important.


Keywords

Advanced-stage endometrial; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Uterine; Interval debulking


Cite and Share

Adam C. ElNaggar,Robert Neff,Marilly Palettas,Samara Pollock,Michael Ulm,Joann Gold,Naixin Zhang,Todd D. Tillmanns,David Cohn. Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of stage IVB endometrial adenocarcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024. 45(4);50-57.

References

[1] Society A.C. Key statistics for endometrial cancer. 2023. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/endometrial-cancer/about/key-statistics.html (Accessed: 01 September 2023).

[2] Crosbie EJ, Kitson SJ, McAlpine JN, Mukhopadhyay A, Powell ME, Singh N. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet. 2022; 399: 1412–1428.

[3] Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Beller U, Benedet JL, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2006; 95: S105–S143.

[4] Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Medel NIB, Deutsch I, Burke WM, Sun X, et al. Comparative performance of the 2009 international federation of gynecology and obstetricsʼ staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010; 116: 1141–1149.

[5] Mahdy H, MJ Casey, D. Crotzer. Endometrial cancer. StatPearls publishing: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[6] Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2018; 16: 170–199.

[7] Miller DS, Filiaci VL, Mannel RS, Cohn DE, Matsumoto T, Tewari KS, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced endometrial cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a phase III trial (NRG Oncology/GOG0209). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020; 38: 3841–3850.

[8] Bristow RE, Zerbe MJ, Rosenshein NB, Grumbine FC, Montz FJ. Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival. Gynecologic Oncology. 2000; 78: 85–91.

[9] Pergialiotis V, Haidopoulos D, Christodoulou T, Rodolakis I, Prokopakis I, Liontos M, et al. Factors that affect survival outcomes in patients with endometrial clear cell carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 6931.

[10] Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, et al. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019; 69: 258–279.

[11] Tobias CJ, Chen L, Melamed A, St Clair C, Khoury-Collado F, Tergas AI, et al. Association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival in women with metastatic endometrial cancer. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3: e2028612.

[12] Bogani G, Ditto A, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Scaffa C, Mosca L, Chiappa V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for unresectable stage IVB Serous endometrial cancer. Tumori Journal. 2019; 105: 92–97.

[13] Arora T, S Mullangi, M.R. Lekkala. Ovarian Cancer. StatPearls publishing: Treasure Island (FL). 2023.

[14] Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G, Pasciuto T, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, et al. Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850). International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 30: 1657–1664.

[15] de Lange NM, Ezendam NPM, Kwon JS, Vandenput I, Mirchandani D, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Current Oncology. 2019; 26: e226–e232.

[16] Vandenput I, Van Calster B, Capoen A, Leunen K, Berteloot P, Neven P, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment? British Journal of Cancer. 2009; 101: 244–249.

[17] Despierre E, Moerman P, Vergote I, Amant F. Is there a role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV serous endometrial carcinoma? International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2006; 16: 273–277.

[18] Chambers LM, Jia X, Rose PG, AlHilli M. Impact of treatment modality on overall survival in women with advanced endometrial cancer: a national cancer database analysis. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 160: 405–412.

[19] Philp L, Kanbergs A, Laurent JS, Growdon WB, Feltmate C, Goodman A. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology Reports. 2021; 36: 100725.

[20] Wilkinson-Ryan I, Frolova AI, Liu J, Stewart Massad L, Thaker PH, Powell MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary cytoreductive surgery for stage IV uterine serous carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2015; 25: 63–68.

[21] Huang AB, Wu J, Chen L, Albright BB, Previs RA, Moss HA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Gynecologic Oncology Reports. 2021; 38: 100887.

[22] Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2009; 105: 103–104.

[23] Khouri OR, Frey MK, Musa F, Muggia F, Lee J, Boyd L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 2019; 84: 281–285.

[24] Eto T, Saito T, Shimokawa M, Hatae M, Takeshima N, Kobayashi H, et al. Status of treatment for the overall population of patients with stage IVb endometrial cancer, and evaluation of the role of preoperative chemotherapy: a retrospective multi-institutional study of 426 patients in Japan. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 131: 574–580.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top