Article Data

  • Views 712
  • Dowloads 146

Original Research

Open Access

How safe is a three-year screening interval for cervical cancer with conventional cytology in southeastern Serbia?

  • R. Zivadinovic1,5,*,
  • D. Stankovic-Djordjevic2,8
  • B. Zivadinovic3,6
  • D. Krtinic4,7
  • A. Petric1,5
  • A. Zivadinovic9
  • V. Radovanovic9

1Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics,Serbia

2Department for Microbiology and Immunology,Serbia

3Department for Neurology,Serbia

4Department for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis

5Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, 6Clinic for Neurology, Serbia

6Clinic for Oncology, Clinical center, Nis

7Institute for Public Health, Nis

8Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Nis (Serbia)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo5194.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.1010-1018

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): R. Zivadinovic E-mail: radomir.zivadinovic@medfak.ni.ac.rs

Abstract

Aim: Purpose of this investigation was to determine the influence of cervical cytology on the reduction of high-grade cervical in-traepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cervical cancer (CC) incidence. Materials and Methods: All the patients treated for HSIL and CC at the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics Nis in the last three years. All filled in questionnaires. Before the surgery treatment, human papillomavirus (HPV) test samples were obtained from all the patients. Results: The results have shown that a three-year cervical cancer screening using conventional cytology is not reliable enough and it has not been shown to result in statistically sig-nificant reduction of HSIL and CC incidence. Conclusion: HPV test has increased the reliability of cytology in detecting pre-invasive lesions and it has statistically significantly reduced false-negative rate of cytology results in micro-invasive and invasive changes of the cervix.

Keywords

Conventional cytology; Human papillomavirus testing; Cervical cancer screening.


Cite and Share

R. Zivadinovic,D. Stankovic-Djordjevic,B. Zivadinovic,D. Krtinic,A. Petric,A. Zivadinovic,V. Radovanovic. How safe is a three-year screening interval for cervical cancer with conventional cytology in southeastern Serbia?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);1010-1018.

References

McCredie M.R., Sharples K.J., Paul C., Baranyai J., Medley G., Jones R.W., Skegg D.C.: “Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neo-plasia 3: a retrospective cohort study”. Lancet Oncol., 2008, 9, 425.

[2] Arbyn M., Raifu A.O., Weiderpass E., Bray F., Anttila A. “Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union”. Eur. J. Cancer., 2009, 45, 2640.

[3] Meerding W.J., van Ballegooijen M., Burger M.P., van den Akker-van Marle M.E., Quint W.G., Habbema J.D. “Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women referred because of abnormal smears. A decision analysis considering outcomes and costs”. J. Clin. Epi-demiol., 2002, 55, 1025.

[4] Rijkaart D.C., Berkhof J., van Kemenade F.J., Coupe V.M., Rozen-daal L., Heideman D.A., et al. “HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications”. Br. J. Cancer., 2012, 106, 975.

[5] Rijkaart D.C., Berkhof J., van Kemenade F.J., Coupe V.M., Hes-selink A.T., Rozendaal L., et al. “Evaluation of 14 triage strategies for HPV DNA-positive women in population-based cervical screen-ing”. Int. J. Cancer., 2012, 130, 602.

[6] Schiffman M., Castle P.E., Jeronimo J., Rodriguez A.C., Wacholder S. “Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2007, 370, 890.

[7] Lowy D.R., Schiller J.T. “Reducing HPV-associated cancer glob-ally”. Cancer. Prev. Res. (Phila), 2012, 5, 18.

[8] Mayrand M.H., Duarte-Franco E., Rodrigues I., Walter S.D., Hanley J., Ferenczy A., et al; Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Study Group. “Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1579.

[9] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al. “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, meth-ods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J. Cancer., 2015, 136, E359.

[10] Ferlay J., Shin H.R., Bray F., Forman D., Mathers C., Parkin D.M. “Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008”. Int. J. Cancer., 2010, 127, 2893.

[11] Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije. No. 73/2013 and 83/2013: “Ure-dba o nacionalnom programu ranog otkrivanja karcinoma grlića ma-terice”.

[12] Cuzick J., Clavel C., Petry K.U., Meijer C.J., Hoyer H., Ratnam S., et al.: “Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening”. Int. J. Cancer, 2006, 119, 1095.

[13] Ronco G., Giorgi-Rossi P., Carozzi F., Confortini M., Dalla Palma P., Del Mistro A., et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group. “Results at recruitment from a random-ized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test”. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 2008, 100, 492.

[14] Paraskevaidis E., Kitchener H.C., Miller I.D., Mann E., Jandial L., Fisher P.M.: “A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix—a colposcopic and cytologic analysis”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 45, 9.

[15] Castanon A., Landy R., Sasieni P.D. “Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix”? Int. J. Cancer, 2016, 139, 1040.

[16] Nanda K., McCrory D.C., Myers E.R., Bastian L.A., Hasselblad V., Hickey J.D., Matchar D.B.: “Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review”. Ann. Intern. Med., 2000, 132, 810.

[17] Ronco G., Giorgi-Rossi P., Carozzi F., Confortini M., Dalla Palma P., Del Mistro A., et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer screening (NTCC) Working Group. “Efficacy of human papillo-mavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 249.

[18] Herdman M.T., Pett M.R., Roberts I., Alazawi W.O., Teschendorff A. E., Zhang X.Y., et al.: “Interferon-beta treatment of cervical ker-atinocytes naturally infected with human papillomavirus 16 epi-somes promotes rapid reduction in episome numbers and emergence of latent integrants”. Carcinogenesis, 2006, 27, 2341.

[19] Tsai T.C., Chen S.L.: “The biochemical and biological functions of human papillomavirus type 16 E5 protein”. Arch. Virol., 2003, 148, 1445.

[20] Stoler M.H., Wright T.C. Jr., Sharma A., Apple R., Gutekunst K., Wright T.L.; ATHENA (Addressing THE Need for Advanced HPV Diagnostics) HPV Study Group: “High-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with ASC-US cytology: results from the ATHENA HPV study”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 2011, 135, 468.

[21] Rodríguez A.C., Schiffman M., Herrero R., Hildesheim A., Bratti C., Sherman M.E., et al.: “Longitudinal study of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: critical role of duration of infection”. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 2010, 102, 315.

[22] Veijalainen O., Kares S., Kujala P., Vuento R., Osuala V., Tirkkonen M., et al.: “Implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in an organised regional screening programme: 3 years of experi-ence”. Cytopathology, 2019, 30, 150.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top