Article Data

  • Views 737
  • Dowloads 116

Original Research

Open Access

Extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection with laparotomy in occult invasive cervical cancer found after a simple hysterectomy

  • H.Ç. Özcan1,*,
  • Ö. Balat1
  • M.G. Uğur1
  • S. Sucu1
  • N.B. Tepe1
  • Ö.K. Karuserci̇1
  • Z. Bozdağ2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep,Turkey

2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep ,Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4724.2019 Vol.40,Issue 6,December 2019 pp.948-952

Published: 10 December 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): H.Ç. Özcan E-mail: ozcan.caglayan8@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: To evaluate the authors’ experience and clinical outcomes of extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) and subsequent radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in 21 patients with invasive cervical cancer found in simple hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed the data of patients with occult invasive cervical cancer (OICC) detected after simple hysterectomy carried out for benign gynecologic conditions or preinvasive cervical lesions from 2007 to 2017. Results: All patients were classified into three groups as low risk, high risk, and specially selected according to pathological reports and imaging methods. All patients were staged IA1 to 2B and all pathological reports revealed squamous cell carcinoma. There were 6, 13, and 2 patients in the high-risk group, low-risk group, and specially selected group; respectively. During a median follow-up of 39 months, patients did not show any recurrence. All adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was initiated at three weeks postoperatively without delay. There were two postoperative complications. The mean operation time regarding extraperitoneal lymph node dissection (ELND) was 33.66 ± 5.36 minutes and median postoperative hospital stay was two days. Conclusions: Optimal treatment plan can be made after pathological examination and interpretation of imaging methods in patients with OICC after simple hysterectomy (SH). EPLND may be considered as a safe and reliable first-line surgical option in the management of patients with OICC after SH.

Keywords

Extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection; Occult invasive cervical cancer; Simple hysterectomy; Adjuvant treatment; Laparotomy.

Cite and Share

H.Ç. Özcan,Ö. Balat,M.G. Uğur,S. Sucu,N.B. Tepe,Ö.K. Karuserci̇,Z. Bozdağ. Extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection with laparotomy in occult invasive cervical cancer found after a simple hysterectomy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(6);948-952.

References

[1] Leath C..A. 3rd, Straughn J.M., Bhoola S.M., Partridge E.E., Kilgore L. C., Alvarez R.D.: “The role of radical parametrectomy in the treat-ment of occult cervical carcinoma after extrafascial hysterectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 215.

[2] Bai H., Cao D., Yuan F., Wang H., Chen J., Wang Y., et al.: ”Occult invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy: a multi-center retrospective study of 89 cases”. BMC Cancer, 2016, 16, 507.

[3] Barber H.R., Pece G.V., Brunschwig A.: “Operative management of patients previously operated upon for a benign lesion with cervical cancer as a surprise finding”. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1968, 101, 959.

[4] Chang S.J., Kim W.Y., Yoo S.C., Yoon J.H., Chun M., Chang K.H., et al.: “A validation study of new risk grouping criteria for postop-erative treatment in stage IB cervical cancers without high-risk fac-tors: rethinking the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2009, 147, 91.

[5] Köhler C., Klemm P., Schau A., Possover M., Krause N., Tozzi R., et al.: “Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 95, 52.

[6] Savino L., Borruto F., Comparetto C., Massi G.B.: “Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cer-vical cancer”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2001, 22, 31.

[7] Vasilev S.A.: “A modified incision and technique for total retroperi-toneal access and lymph node dissection”. Gynecol Oncol., 1995, 56, 226.

[8] Querleu D., Plante M., Sonoda Y., Gotlieb W., Leblanc E.: “Mini-mally invasive surgery in gynecologic cancer”. In: Barakat R.R., Berchuck A., Markman M., Randall M.E. (eds). Principles and prac-tice of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013, 210.

[9] Lea J.S., Sheets E.E., Duska L.R., Miller D.S., Schorge J.O.: “Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent: the role of paraaortic lymph node dissection”. Gynecol Oncol., 2002, 84, 285.

[10] Averette H.E., Nguyen H.N., Donato D.M., Penalver M.A., Sevin M. U., Estape R., et al.: “Radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer. A 25-year prospective experience with the Miami technique”. Cancer, 1993, 71, 1422.

Finan M.A., DeCesare S., Fiorica J.V., Chambers R., Mitchel S.F., Richard C.K., et al.: “Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 car-cinoma of the cervix: does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival?” Gynecol Oncol., 1996, 62, 139.

Larciprete G., Casalino B., Segatore M.F., Jarvis S., Catarinella V., Cirese E.: “Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperi-toneal versus laparoscopic approach”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Re-prod. Biol., 2006, 126, 259.

[13] Gallup D.G., Jordan G.H., Talledo O.E.: “Extraperitoneal lymph node dissections with use of a midline incision in patients with fe-male genital cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1986, 155, 559.

[14] Hasenburg A., Salama J.K., Van T.J., Amosson C., Chiu J.K., Kieback D.G.: “Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection and subsequent radiotherapy for cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 84, 321.

[15] Panici P.B., Plotti F., Zullo M.A., Muzii L., Manci M., et al.: “Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: Laparotomy extraperi-toneal, transperitoneal or laparoscopic approach? A randomized study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 859.

[16] Morris M.: “Management of stage IA cervical carcinoma”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr., 1996, 21, 47.

[17] van Nagell Jr. J.R., Greenwell N., Powell D.F., Donaldson E.S., Han-son M.B., Gay E.C.: “Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 145, 981.

[18] Ayhan A., Otegen U., Guven S., KucukaliT.: “\Radical reoperation for invasive cervical cancer found in simple hysterectomy”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 94, 28.

[19] Munstedt K., Johnson P., von Georgi R., Vahrson H., Tinneberg H.R., et al.: “Consequences of inadvertent, suboptimal primary surgery in carcinoma of the uterine cervix”. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 94, 515.

[20] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T., Jam J.H.: “Man-agement of occult invasive cervical cancer found after simple hys-terectomy”. Ann. Oncol., 2010, 21, 994.

[21] Landoni F., Maneo A., Colombo A., Placa F., Milani R., Perego P., et al.: “Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer”. Lancet, 1997, 350, 535.

[22] Huerta Bahena J., Labastida Almendaro S., Cortez Arroyo H., Calva A.: “Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with invasive uterine cervix cancer treated previously with simple hysterectomy. Results from the Hospital de Oncologia, Centro Medico Nacional SXXI”. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex., 2003, 71, 304.

[23] Chen S.W., Liang J.A., Yang S.N., Lin F.J.: “Postoperative radio-therapy for patients with invasive cervical cancer following treatment with simple hysterectomy”. Jpn J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 33, 477.

[24] Rotman M., Sedlis A., Piedmonte M.R., Bundy B., Lentz S.S., Mud-erspach L.I., et al.: “A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol., Phys., 2006, 65, 169.

[25] Sedlis A., Bundy B.N., Rotman M.Z., Lentz S.S., Muderspach L.I., Zaino R.J.: “A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 73, 177.

[26] Testa A.C., Di Legge A., De Blasis I., Moruzzi M.A., Bonatti M., Collarino A., et al.: “Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervi-cal cancer”. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2014, 28, 741.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top