Article Data

  • Views 547
  • Dowloads 106

Original Research

Open Access

Carboplatin and low-dose paclitaxel. An effective regimen in older and comorbid patients with advanced cervical cancer. A phase II study.

  • J. Coronel1,2
  • D. Cantú1
  • M. Rodríguez-Morales1
  • L. Cetina1
  • A. González-Fierro3
  • A. Dueñas-González3,*,

1Division of Clinical Research, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico

2Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Hospital “Adolfo López Mateos” ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico

3Division of Basic Research, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4306.2018 Vol.39,Issue 6,December 2018 pp.997-1001

Published: 15 December 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): A. Dueñas-González E-mail: 'alfonso_duenasg@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in elderly and/or any age comorbid patients with FIGO Stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients were accrued. Eligibility criteria included older than 65 years, or any age with uncontrolled diabetes and/or blood hypertension and other comorbid conditions. Treatment consisted of six 28-day cycles of carboplatin at AUC of 5 at day 1, and low-dose paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 at days 1, 8, and 15 infused in two hours. Metabolic response was evaluated by [18F]-FDG uptake (PET-CT) and toxicity with the NCI CTC v2. Results: From January 2012 to January 2015 a total of 30 patients were included in the study. The median number of chemotherapy cycles administered was five (1-6). Three (10%) had complete response and nine (30%) partial response for an overall response rate of 48%. One patient (4%) had stable disease and 17 (56%) showed progressive disease. At a median follow-up time of 12.5 (1-37) months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.7 and 14.3 months, respectively. Grade 4 toxicities were anemia in three patients (10%), grade 3 neutropenia and vomiting occurred in one (3%), and one (3%) respectively. All other toxicities were grades 1 and 2. A substantial proportion of patients had grade zero toxicity. Conclusion: This study shows that this 28-day regimen of low-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel is effective and safe in an elderly and/or comorbid population of advanced cervical cancer.

Keywords

Advanced cervical cancer; First-line chemotherapy; Low-dose paclitaxel; Carboplatin; Aged; Comorbid.

Cite and Share

J. Coronel,D. Cantú,M. Rodríguez-Morales,L. Cetina,A. González-Fierro,A. Dueñas-González. Carboplatin and low-dose paclitaxel. An effective regimen in older and comorbid patients with advanced cervical cancer. A phase II study.. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(6);997-1001.

References

[1] Dueñas-Gonzalez A., Cetina L., Coronel J., Cano C., Dolores R.: “New pharmacotherapy options for cervical cancer”. Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2014, 15 ,51.

[2] Tewari K.S., Sill M.W., Long H.J. 3rd., Penson R.T., Huang H., Ramondetta L.M., et al: “Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2014, 370, 734.

[3] Ancik R., Ries L.A.: “Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world”. Semin. Oncol. 2004,31,128.

[4] Ør Knudsen A., Schledermann D., Nyvang G.B., Mogensen O., Herrstedt J.: “Trends in gynecologic cancer among elderly women in Denmark, 1980-2012”. Acta Oncol. 2016, 55, 65.

[5] van Rijswijk R.E., Vermorken J.B.: “Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women”. Drugs Aging, 2000, 17, 13.

[6] Ioka A., Tsukuma H., Ajiki W.,Oshima A.: “Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan”. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 35, 464.

[7] Wright J.D., Gibb R.K., Geevarghese S., Powell M.A., Herzog T.J., Mutch D.G., et al.: “Cervical carcinoma in the elderly. An analysis of patterns of care and outcome”. Cancer, 2005, 103, 85.

[8] Kunos C., Gibbons H., Simpkins F., Waggoner S.: “Chemotherapy administration during pelvic radiation for cervical cancer patients aged >/=55 years in the SEER-Medicare population”. J. Oncol., 2008, 2008, 931532.

[9] Lamy P.P.: “Comparative pharmacokinetic changes and drug therapy in an older population”. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 1982, 30, 11.

[10] Caramori M.L, Mauer M.: “Diabetes and nephropathy”. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens., 2003, 12, 273.

[11] Mennuni S., Rubattu S., Pierelli G., Tocci G., Fofi C., Volpe M.: “Hypertension and kidneys: unraveling complex molecular mechanisms underlying hypertensive renal damage”. J. Hum. Hypertens., 2014, 28, 74.

[12] Calvo E., Walko C., Dees E.C., Valenzuela B.: “Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in the era of targeted therapies”. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2016, 35, e175.

[13] Danilov A.V., Lewis L.D., Lansigan F., Roudaia L., Findley D.L., Jones S.Y., et al.: “A phase I dose-ranging study of bendamustine and rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with comorbidities”. Br. J. Haematol., 2017, 178, 820.

[14] Marchetti C., De Felice F., Musella A., Palaia I., Monti M., Musio D., et al.: “Weekly versus three weeks chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis”. Oncotarget, 2016, 7, 58709.

[15] Kitagawa R., Katsumata N., Shibata T., Kamura T., Kasamatsu T., Nakanishi T., et al.: “Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: The openlabel randomized phase III trial JCOG0505”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 33, 2129.

[16] American Diabetes Association: “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2008”. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31, S12.

[17] Lenfant C., Chobanian A.V., Jones D.W., Roccela E.J.: “Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7): resetting the hypertension sails”. Hypertension, 2003, 41, 1178.

[18] Young H., Baum R., Cremerius U., Herholz K., Hoekstra O., Lammertsma A.A.: “Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group”. Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1773.

[19] Simon R.: “Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials”. Control. Clin. Trials. 1989, 10, 1.

[20] Monk B.J., Sill M.W., McMeekin D.S., Cohn D.E., Ramondetta L.M., Boardman C.H.: “Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27,4649.

[21] Talarico L., Chen G., Pazdur R.: “Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 4626.

[22] Secord A.A., Havrilesky L.J., Carney M.E., Soper J.T., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Rodriguez G.C., Berchuck A.: ”Weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical and endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 12, 31.

[23] Mabuchi S., Morishige K., Enomoto T., Kimura T.: “Carboplatin and paclitaxel as an initial treatment in patients with stage IVb cervical cancer: a report of 7 cases and a review of the literature”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 21, 93.

[24] Tinker A.V., Bhagat K., Swenerton K.D., Hoskins P.J.: “Carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma: the British Columbia Cancer Agency experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 54.

[25] Dumas L., Ring A., Butler J., Kalsi T., Harari D., Banerjee S.: “Improving outcomes for older women with gynaecological malignancies”. Cancer Treat. Rev., 2016, 50, 99.

[26] Chuang LT, Temin S, Camacho R, Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Feldman S, Gultekin M., et al.: “Management and care of women with invasive cervical cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource- Stratified Clinical Practice Guideline”. J. Global Oncol., 2016, 2, 311.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top