Article Data

  • Views 500
  • Dowloads 103

Original Research

Open Access

Correlation between the intrinsic subtype and diagnostic methodsof axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer

  • Yu Feng1
  • Yunchao Wang1
  • Xia Zhao1
  • Ying Mu1
  • Shuzhen Lv1
  • Yanping Li1,*,

1Breast Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Captial Medical University, Beijing, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4009.2018 Vol.39,Issue 6,December 2018 pp.921-925

Published: 15 December 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Yanping Li E-mail: yp671102@sina.com

Abstract

Objectives: To discover the relationship between intrinsic subtypes and axillary lymph nodes metastatic proportion, to compare the accuracy of clinical examination, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of suspicious axillary nodes, and to evaluate the best method of axillary lymph nodes staging in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: From May 2010 to March 2015, patients presenting with primary breast cancer had clinical examination and ultrasonography for axillary lymph node staging. The pathological results of US-guided needle biopsy and clinical data of these patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 292 (41.8%) of 698 patients confirmed the presence of axillary lymph nodes metastases. Luminal B (HER2-) and HER2 positive tumors had a higher node positivity rate than other intrinsic types. Axillary lymph nodes metastases rate indicates significant difference in each intrinsic subtype. Sixty-eight (11.5%) node-positive patients were identified by ultrasound-fine needle aspiration cytology (BUS–FNAC) and spared unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Fifteen (14.2%) patients who had palpable lymph nodes had negative results in both FNAC and SLNB, and spared unnecessary complete axillary node clearance. Clinical examination had an accuracy of 69.1%, and EBUS-FNAC had 79.4%. Conclusion: The intrinsic subtypes are related with axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. In comparing with clinical examination, ultrasonography evaluation for axilla status, combined with ultrasoundguided needle biopsy of suspicious axillary node is more accurate, and it is valuable prior to SLNB in primary breast cancer treatment.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Intrinsic subtypes; Lymph node; Fine-needle aspiration cytology; prognosis; treatment

Cite and Share

Yu Feng,Yunchao Wang,Xia Zhao,Ying Mu,Shuzhen Lv,Yanping Li. Correlation between the intrinsic subtype and diagnostic methodsof axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(6);921-925.

References

[1] Perou C.M., Sørlie T., Eisen M.B., van de Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., Rees C.A. ,et al.: “Molecular portraits of human breast tumours”. Nature, 2000, 406, 747.

[2] Blows F.M., Driver K.E., Schmidt M.K., Broeks A., van Leeuwen F.E., Wesseling J., et al.: “Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies”. PLoS Med., 2010, 7, e1000279.

[3] Millikan R.C., Newman B., Tse C.K., Moorman P.G., Comway K., Dressler L.G., et al.: “Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2008, 109, 123.

[4] Dignam J.J., Dukic V., Anderson S.J., Mamounas E.P., Wickerham D.L., Wolmark N.: “Hazard of recurrence and adjuvant treatment effects over time in lymph node-negative breast cancer”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2009, 116, 595.

[5] Albain K.S., Barlow W.E., Shak S., Hortobagyi G.N., Livingston R.B., Yeh I.T., et al.: “Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomized trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 55.

[6] Mansel R.E., Fallowfield L., Kissin M., Goyal A., Newcombe R.G., Dixon J.M., et al.: “Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2006, 98, 599.

[7] Sacre R.A.: “Clinical evaluation of axillary lymph nodes compared to surgical and pathological findings”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 1986, 12, 169.

[8] Krishnamurthy S., Sneige N., Bedi D.G., Edieken B.S., Fornage B.D., Kuerer H.M., et al.: “Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma”. Cancer, 2002, 95, 982.

[9] Houssami N., Ciatto S., Turner R.M., Cody H.S. 3rd., Macaskill P.: “Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla”. Ann. Surg., 2011, 254, 243.

[10] Goldhirsch A., Winer E.P., Coates A.S., Gelber R.D., Piccart-Gebhart M., Thürlimann B., et al.: “Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013”. Ann. Oncol., 2013, 24, 2206.

[11] Hicks D.G., Kulkarni S.: “Trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: The importance of accurate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 2008, 132, 1008.

[12] Rüschoff J., Dietel M., Baretton G., Arbogast S., Walch A., Monges G., et al.: “HER2 diagnostics in gastric cancer—Guideline validation and development of standardized immunohistochemical testing.” Virchows Arch., 2010, 457, 299.

[13] Lane H.A., Beuvink I., Motoyama A.B., Daly J.M., Neve R.M., Hynes N.E.: “ErbB2 potentiates breast tumor proliferation through modulation of p27Kip1-Cdk2 complex formation: Receptor overexpression does not determine growth dependency”. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2000, 20, 3210.

[14] Dankort D., Jeyabalan N., Jones N., Dumont D.J., Muller W.J.: “Multiple ErbB-2/Neu phosphorylation sites mediate transformation through distinct effector proteins”. J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 38921.

[15] Slamon D.G., Clark G.M., Wong S.G., Levin W.J., Ullrich A., Mcguire W.L.: “Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene”. Science, 1987, 235, 177.

[16] The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN): “Breast cancer practice guidelines”. Practice Guidelines in Oncology”. (V. 2. 2015).

[17] American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 7thed., 2010, ch. 32, 432.

[18] Mills P., Sever A., Weeks J., Fish D., Jones S., Jones P.: “Axillary ultrasound assessment in prmary breast cancer: an audit of 653 cases”. Breast J., 2010, 16, 460.

[19] Huo L., Yan K., Zhang H., Gao W., Fu Y., Fan Z.Q., et al.: “Morpholog- based criteria for ultrasonic assessment of axillary lymph node status in primary breast cancer”. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2012, 92, 672.

[20] van Rijk M.C., Deurloo E.E., Nieweg O.E., Gilhuijs K.G., Peterse J.L., Rutgers E.J., et al.: “Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare patients with breast cancer unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 13, 31.

[21] Tahir M., Osman K.A., Shabbir J., Rogers C., Suarez R., Reynolds T, Bucknall T.: “Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer-saving time and resources”. Breast J., 2008, 14, 369.

[22] Alkuwari E., Auger M.: “Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: a study of 115 cases with cytologic-histologic correlation.” Cancer, 2008, 114, 89.

[23] Krishnamurthy S., Hynek I., Vasquez S., Hunt K.K., Yang W.: “Utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the management of patients with early breast cancer: a study of 278 patients”. Cancer, 2008, 114, 350.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top