Article Data

  • Views 549
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Lymph node metastasis in early stage endometrial cancer

  • A. Kaban1,*,
  • B. Erdem2
  • I. Kaban3
  • C. Numanoğlu2

1University of Istanbul, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Istanbul (Turkey)

2Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education & Resarch Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Department, Halkalı, Istanbul (Turkey)

3Istanbul Education & Research Hospital, Istanbul (Turkey)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3933.2018 Vol.39,Issue 3,June 2018 pp.415-421

Published: 10 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): A. Kaban E-mail: alpaslankaban@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to investigate which criteria were most important in predicting the risk of nodal metastasis if deep myometrial invasion occupying less than half of the myometrium in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Materials and Methods: Among the patients with EC who were operated in the present clinic between 2002 and 2015, and those who had less than half-depth myometrial tumour invasion were included in the study. In these patients, the relationship of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) with the criteria of age, histologic subtype, grade, tumour size, abdominal fluid cytology, cervical involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was analysed. Results: A total of 567 patients were examined and 329 of these were analysed. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 89% of the patients, pelvic lymphadenectomy in 53% (156/294) of the patients, and both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in 47% (138/294). PLNM was found in 7.9% of the patients (26/329). The rates of non-endometrioid histologic subtypes, LVSI, and peritoneal malignant cytology were found to be significantly higher in the patients with PLNM compared to those without PLNM (p = 0.040, p = 0.001, and p = 0.034). When the effects of age, subtype, tumour size, abdominal fluid, grade, and LVSI were evaluated with logistic regression analysis, it was observed that the effects of subtype and LVSI were statistically significant (OR (95%CI): 4.616 (1.085, 19.636), p = 0.038 and OR (95%CI): 3.530 (1.446, 8.613), p = 0.006, respectively). TThe other variables included in the logistic regression analysis were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The specificity was 99.6% in this statistical model. Conclusion: It is considerably safe to apply a treatment plan based on the criteria of histologic subtype and LVSI in patients with less than half depth myometrial invasion.


Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Deep myometrial invasion; Lymph node metastasis.

Cite and Share

A. Kaban,B. Erdem,I. Kaban,C. Numanoğlu. Lymph node metastasis in early stage endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(3);415-421.

References

[1] Amant F., Moerman P., Neven P., Timmerman D., Van Limbergen E., Vergote I.: “Endometrial cancer”. Lancet, 2005, 366, 491.

[2] Siegel R., Naishadham D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2013”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2013, 63, 11.

[3] “The Ministry of Health of Turkey Health Statistics Yearbook 2013”. Mehmet Rifat Köse, Berrak Bora Başara, Cemil Güler, Gökalp Kadri Yentür: General Directorate of Health Research, Ministry of Health. Ankara, 2014. Available at: http://www.sagem.gov.tr

[4] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C., Lybeert M.L., Jobsen J.J., Wárlám-Rodenhuis C.C., et al.: “Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma”. Lancet, 2000, 355, 1404.

[5] Papanikolaou A., Kalogiannidis I., Goutzioulis M., Misailidou D., Makedos A., Vergote I., Makedos G.: “Pelvic lymphadenectomy as alternative to postoperative radiotherapy in high risk early stage endometrial cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2006, 274, 91.

[6] American Cancer Society. Available at: www.cancer.org/docroot/home/index.asp.

[7] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Hao Y., Xu J., Murray T., Thun M.J.” Cancer statistics, 2008”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2008, 58, 71.

[8] Erkanli S., Ayhan A.: “Fertility-sparing therapy in young women with endometrial cancer: 2010 update”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2010, 20, 1170.

[9] Tangjitgamol S., Manusirivithaya S., Hanprasertpong J.: “Fertilitysparing in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2009, 67, 250.

[10] Chiva L., Lapuente F., González-Cortijo L., Carballo N., García J.F., Rojo A., Gonzalez-Martín A.: “Sparing fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 101.

[11] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Beller U., Benedet J.L., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2006, 95, 105.

[12] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: “ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65, 2005: Management of endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 106, 413.

[13] Lee T.S., Jung J.Y., Kim J.W., Park N.H., Song Y.S., Kang S.B., Lee H.P.: “Feasibility of ovarian preservation in patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 104, 52.

[14] Lee T.S., Kim J.W., Kim T.J., Cho C.H., Ryu S.Y., Ryu H.S., et al.: Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group. Ovarian preservation during the surgical treatment of early stage endometrial cancer: a nationwide study conducted by the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 26.

[15] Wright J.D., Buck A.M., Shah M., Burke W.M., Schiff P.B., Herzog T.J.: “Safety of ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 1214.

[16] Todo Y., Sakuragi N.: “Systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2013, 39, 471.

[17] Lurain J.R., Rice B.L., Rademaker A.W., Poggensee L.E., Schink J.C., Miller D.S.: “Prognostic factors associated with recurrence in clinical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 78, 63.

[18] Arsène E., Bleu G., Merlot B., Boulanger L., Vinatier D., Kerdraon O., et al.: “Implications of a two-step procedure in surgical management of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 26, 125.

[19] Creasman W.T., Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Homesley H.D., Graham J.E., Heller P.B.: “Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. Cancer, 1987, 60, 2035.

[20] Watanabe Y., Aoki D., Kitagawa R., Takeuchi S., Sagae S., Sakuragi N., et al.: “Disease Committee of Uterine Endometrial Cancer, Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Status of surgical treatment procedures for endometrial cancer in Japan: results of a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 325.

[21] Anton C., di Fávero G.M., Köhler C., Carvalho F.M., Baracat E.C., Carvalho J.P.: “Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer in developing countries: reasons to consider systematic two-step surgical treatment”. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2015, 70, 470.

[22] Goff B.A., Kato D., Schmidt R.A., Ek M., Ferry J.A., Muntz H.G., et al.: “Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: patterns of metastatic spread”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 54, 264.

[23] Colombo N., Preti E., Landoni F., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., Sessa C.: “ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann. Oncol., 2013, 24, vi33.

[24] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[25] Garg G., Gao F., Wright J.D., Hagemann A.R., Mutch D.G., Powell M.A.: “Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 128, 77.

[26] Keller D., Kempson R.L., Levine G., McLennan C.: “Management of the patient with early endometrial carcinoma”. Cancer, 1974, 33, 1108.

[27] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Haddock M.G., Calori G., Podratz K.C.: “Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary?” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 182, 1506.

[28] Bendifallah S., Canlorbe G., Arsène E., Collinet P., Huguet F., Coutant C., et al.: “French multicenter study evaluating the risk of lymph node metastases in early-stage endometrial cancer: contribution of a risk scoring system”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 22, 2722.

[29] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G., et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[30] ASTEC Study Group, Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[31] Fujiwara H., Saga Y., Takahashi K., Ohwada M., Enomoto A., Konno R., et al.: “Omental metastases in clinical stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 165.

[32] Valsecchi L., Mangili G., Frigerio L., Spagnolo D.L., De Sanctis L., Ferrari A.: “Reliability of preoperative evaluation of prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1997, 59, 35.

[33] Kumar S., Bandyopadhyay S., Semaan A., Shah J.P., Mahdi H., Morris R., et al.: “The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer”. PLoS One, 2011, 6, e21912.

[34] Kumar S., Medeiros F., Dowdy S.C., Keeney G.L., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Podratz K.C., et al.: “A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 525.

[35] Quinlivan J.A., Petersen R.W., Nicklin J.L.: “Accuracy of frozen section for the operative management of endometrial cancer”. BJOG, 108, 798.

[36] Kayikçioğlu F., Boran N., Meydanli M.M., Tulunay G., Köse F.M., Bülbül D.: “Is frozen-section diagnosis a reliable guide in surgical treatment of stage I endometrial carcinoma?” Acta Oncol., 2002, 41, 444.

[37] Turan T., Oguz E., Unlubilgin E., Tulunay G., Boran N., Demir O.F., et al.: “Accuracy of frozen-section examination for myometrial invasion and grade in endometrial cancer”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2013, 167, 90.

[38] Case A.S., Rocconi R.P., Straughn J.M. Jr., Conner M., Novak L., Wang W., et al.: “A prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 108, 1375.

[39] Todo Y., Kato H., Kaneuchi M., Watari H., Takeda M., Sakuragi N.: “Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis”. Lancet, 2010, 375, 1165.

[40] Abu-Rustum N.R., Gomez J.D., Alektiar K.M., Soslow R.A., Hensley M.L., Leitao M.M. Jr., et al.: “The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 236.

[41] Kumar S., Podratz K.C., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Dowdy S.C., Weaver A.L., McGree M.E., et al.: “Prospective assessment of the prevalence of pelvic, paraaortic and high paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 38.

[42] Chiang A.J., Yu K.J., Chao K.C., Teng N.N.: “The incidence of isolated para-aortic nodal metastasis in completely staged endometrial cancer patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 122.

[43] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Wilson T.O., et al.: “Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 11.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top