Article Data

  • Views 827
  • Dowloads 138

Original Research

Open Access

Appendectomy with cytoreductive surgery for ovarian and type 2 endometrial carcinoma

  • L.F.A. Wong1,*,
  • N.A. Wahab1
  • N. Gleeson1

1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin (Republic of Ireland)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo24372014 Vol.35,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.143-148

Published: 10 March 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): L.F.A. Wong E-mail: wlfaud@yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

There is considerable variation within and between cancer centers in the practice of appendectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma and in the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and the type of appendiceal pathology, the morbidity associated with appendectomy in gynaecologic cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of all cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma and surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma with appendectomy over a four year period. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one patients (38 patients for endometrial carcinoma surgery and 213 patients for ovarian cytoreduction) had an appendectomy performed. Metastases to the appendix was present in 46 (23.2%) of primary ovarian carcinoma and one (2.6%) primary endometrial carcinosarcoma. The appendix was more likely to be involved in advanced stage ovarian cancer with positive peritoneal washings, omental deposits, grade 3 differentiation, and papillary serous histology. Sixteen (6.4%) co-incidental primary appendiceal tumours were detected. No postoperative morbidity specific to appendectomy was identified. One case of ovarian carcinoma was upstaged from IC to IIIA by the appendiceal metastases. There was no upstaging of disease in the endometrial carcinoma group. Discussion: Appendectomy is an integral part of ovarian cytoreductive surgery but the authors found it did not upstage the disease in a clinically significant manner. The incidence of co-incidental appendiceal primary tumours was high in this series and may add value to the procedure in preventing further surgeries. The absence of procedure related morbidity is reassuring. The authors recommend appendectomy for all ovarian staging surgery and its consideration in type 2 endometrial cancer.


Keywords

Cytoreductive surgery; Ovarian cancer; Endometrial cancer; Appendectomy; Gynaecological malignancy; Staging; Appendiceal tumours.

Cite and Share

L.F.A. Wong,N.A. Wahab,N. Gleeson. Appendectomy with cytoreductive surgery for ovarian and type 2 endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2014. 35(2);143-148.

References

[1] Cibula D., Verheijen R., Lopes A., Dusek L.: “ESGO Council. Current clinical practice in cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a European survey”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2011, 21, 1219.

[2] Fontanelli R., Paladini D., Raspagliesi F., di Re E.: “The role of appendectomy in surgical procedures for ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 46, 42.

[3] Rose P.G., Reale F.R., Fisher A., Hunter R.E.: “Appendectomy in primary and secondary staging operations for ovarian malignancy”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 77, 116.

[4] Marino B.D., Burke T.W., Tornos C., Chuang L., Mitchell M.F., Tortolero-Luna G., et al.: “Staging laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma: assessment of peritoneal spread”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 56, 34.

[5] Dilek S., Dilek U., Dede M., Deveci M.S., Yenen M.C.: “The role of omentectomy and appendectomy during the surgical staging of clinical stage I endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 795.

[6] Ayhan A., Gultekin M., Taskiran C., Salman M.C., Celik N.Y., Yuce K., et al.: “Routine appendectomy in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: is it necessary?” Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 105, 719.

[7] Jie L., Oluwole F., Li X., Kong B., Zheng W.: “Ovarian serous carcinoma: recent concepts on its origin and carcinogenesis”. J. Hematol. Oncol., 2012, 5, 8.

[8] Ramirez P.T., Slomovitz B.M., McQuinn L., Levenback C., Coleman R. L.: “Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 888.

[9] Beşe T., Kösebay D., Kaleli S., Oz A.U., Demirkiran F., Gezer A.: “Appendectomy in the surgical staging of ovarian carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1996, 53, 249.

[10] Prayson R.A., Hart W.R., Petras R.E.: “Pseudomyxoma peritonei. A clinicopathologic study of 19 cases with emphasis on site of origin and nature of associated ovarian tumors”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 1994, 18, 591.

[11] Timofeev J., Galgano M.T., Stoler M.H., Lachance J.A., Modesitt S. C., Jazaeri A.A.: “Appendiceal pathology at the time of oophorectomy for ovarian neoplasms”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 116, 1348.

[12] Dietrich C.S., Desimone C.P., Modesitt S.C., Depriest P.D., Ueland F. R., Pavlik E.J., et al.: “Primary appendiceal cancer: gynaecologic manifestations and treatment options”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 104, 602.

[13] Collins D.C.: “71,000 human appendix specimens. A final report summarizing forty years’ study”. Am. J. Proctol., 1963, 14, 365.

[14] Hristov A.C., Young R.H., Vang R., Yemelyanova A.V., Seidman J. D., Ronnett B.M.: “Ovarian metastases of appendiceal tumours with goblet cell carcinoid like and signet ring cell patterns: a report of 30 cases”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2007, 31, 1502.

[15] Bucher P., Gervaz P., Ris F., Oulhaci W., Egger J.F., Morel P.: “Surgical treatment of appendiceal adenocarcinoid (goblet cell carcinoid)”. World J. Surg., 2005, 29, 1436.

[16] Saygili U., Kavaz S., Altunyurt S., Uslu T., Koyuncuoglu M., Erten O.: “Omentectomy, peritoneal biopsy and appendectomy in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2001, 11, 471.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top