Article Data

  • Views 745
  • Dowloads 117

Editorials

Open Access

Contraception after breast cancer: a retrospective review of the practice among French Gynecologists in the 2000’s

  • A.S. Hamy1,2,*,
  • H. Abuellellah1
  • H. Hocini1,2
  • F. Coussy1,3
  • A. Gorins1,2,3
  • D. Serfaty2,3,4
  • B. Tournant1,2
  • F. Perret1,2
  • S. Bonfils1,2
  • S. Giacchetti1,2
  • C. Cuvier1,2
  • M. Espie1,2,3,4

1Centre des maladies du sein, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris

2Groupe d’Etude et de Réflexion sur les Mastopathies, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris

3,Société Française de Gynécologie

4Fédération Nationale des Collèges de Gynécologie Médicale, Paris (France)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo24072014 Vol.35,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.149-153

Published: 10 March 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): A.S. Hamy E-mail: hamyannesophie@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To describe the French practices regarding contraception after breast cancer in the 2000’s. Materials and Methods: A total of 2,500 forms were sent to gynecologists practicing in France. Inclusion criteria were premenopausal patients who had a history of breast cancer and who had been prescribed contraception after diagnosis. Between June 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003, 197 evaluable responses were retrieved. Results: The median age of the sample was 38.5 years. The most commonly used form of contraception was an intrauterine device (n = 144, 73.1%). Hormonal contraception was prescribed for 42 patients (21.3%), and other methods were used in 29 patients (14.7%) (Condoms n = 14, tubal sterilization n = 7, and others n = 8). Recurrence occurred in 27 patients (13%); 2.9% in the progestin group, 16.3% in the IUD group, and 14.8% with the other methods). Conclusions: It is necessary to evaluate current contraception practices after breast cancer to evaluate the efficacy and safety of contraception in these patients.


Keywords

Breast cancer; Contraception; Progestagens; Progestins; Levonorgestrel IUD-intra uterine device.

Cite and Share

A.S. Hamy,H. Abuellellah,H. Hocini,F. Coussy,A. Gorins,D. Serfaty,B. Tournant,F. Perret,S. Bonfils,S. Giacchetti,C. Cuvier,M. Espie. Contraception after breast cancer: a retrospective review of the practice among French Gynecologists in the 2000’s. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2014. 35(2);149-153.

References

[1] Verkooijen H.M., Lim G.H., Czene K., Bhalla V., Chow K.Y., Yap K.P.L. et al.: “ Effect of childbirth after treatment on long-term survival from breast cancer”. Br. J. Surg., 2010, 97, 1253.

[2] Gelber S., Coates A.S., Goldhirsch A., Castiglione-Gertsch M., Marini G., Lindtner J. et al.: “Effect of pregnancy on overall survival after the diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19, 1671.

[3] Ives A., Saunders C,. Bulsara M., Semmens J.: “Pregnancy after breast cancer: population based study”. BMJ, 2007, 334, 194.

[4] Kroman N., Jensen M.-B., Wohlfahrt J., Ejlertsen B.: “Pregnancy after treatment of breast cancer – a population-based study on behalf of Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group”. Acta Oncol., 2008, 47, 545.

[5] Azim H.A. Jr, Santoro L., Pavlidis N., Gelber S., Kroman N., Azim H. et al.: “Safety of pregnancy following breast cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis of 14 studies”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2011, 47, 74.

[6] Chabbert-Buffet N., Uzan C., Gligorov J., Delaloge S., Rouzier R., Uzan S.: “Pregnancy after breast cancer: a need for global patient care, starting before adjuvant therapy”. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 19, 47.

[7] Rippy E.E., Karat I.F., Kissin M.W.: “Pregnancy after breast cancer: the importance of active counselling and planning”. Breast., 2009, 18, 345.

[8] Barthelmes L., Gateley C.A.: “Tamoxifen and pregnancy”. Breast, 2004, 13, 446.

[9] Schwarz E.B., Hess R., Trussell J.: “Contraception for cancer survivors”. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 2009, 24, S401.

[10] Patel A., Sreedevi M., Malapati R., Sutaria R., Schoenhage M.B., Patel A.R. et al.: “Reproductive health assessment for women with cancer: a pilot study”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 201, 191.

[11] WHO | Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fam-ily_planning/9241562668index/en/index.html.

[12] Gardner F.J.E., Konje J.C., Bell S.C., Abrams K.R., Brown L.J.R., Taylor D.J. et al.: “Prevention of tamoxifen induced endometrial polyps using a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system long-term follow-up of a randomised control trial”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 452.

[13] Trinh X.B., Tjalma W.A.A., Makar A.P., Buytaert G., Weyler J., Van Dam P.A.: “Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in breast cancer patients”. Fertil. Steril., 2008, 90, 17.

[14] McNaught J., Reid R.L., Provencher D.M., Lea R.H., Jeffrey J.F., Oza A. et al.: “Progesterone-only and non-hormonal contraception in the breast cancer survivor: Joint Review and Committee Opinion of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists of Canada”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2006, 28, 616.

[15] Madelenat P., Koskas M.: “Update on the progestin-only contraception”. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris), 2008, 37, 637.

[16] Löwy I., Weisz G.: “French hormones: progestins and therapeutic variation in France”. Soc. Sci. Med., 2005, 60, 2609.

[17] Chlebowski R.T., Hendrix S.L., Langer R.D., Stefanick M.L., Gass M., Lane D. et al.: “Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Trial”. JAMA, 2003, 289, 3243.

[18] Plu-Bureau G., Lê M.G., Sitruk-Ware R., Thalabard J.C., Mauvais-Jarvis P.: “Progestogen use and decreased risk of breast cancer in a cohort study of premenopausal women with benign breast disease”. Br. J. Cancer, 1994, 70, 270.

[19] Shapiro S., Rosenberg L., Hoffman M., Truter H., Cooper D., Rao S. et al.: “Risk of breast cancer in relation to the use of injectable progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen/progestogen contraceptives”. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2000, 151, 396.

[20] Strom B.L., Berlin J.A., Weber A.L., Norman S.A., Bernstein L., Burkman R.T. et al.: “Absence of an effect of injectable and im-plantable progestin-only contraceptives on subsequent risk of breast cancer”. Contraception, 2004, 69, 353.

[21] Post-marketing surveillance of Norplant((R)) contraceptive implants: II. Non-reproductive health(1). Contraception, 2001, 63, 187.

[22] Skegg D.C., Paul C., Spears G.F., Williams S.M.: “Progestogen-only oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in New Zealand”. Cancer Causes Control, 1996, 7, 513.

[23] Kumle M., Weiderpass E., Braaten T., Persson I., Adami H. -O., Lund E.: “Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwe-gian-Swedish Women’s Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study”. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2002, 11, 1375.

[24] Dumeaux V., Alsaker E., Lund E.: “Breast cancer and specific types of oral contraceptives: a large Norwegian cohort study”. Int. J. Cancer, 2003, 105, 844.

[25] Fabre A., Fournier A., Mesrine S., Desreux J., Gompel A., Boutron-Ruault M.-C. et al.: “Oral progestagens before menopause and breast cancer risk”. Br. J. Cancer, 2007, 96, 841.

[26] Brédart A., Dolbeault S., Savignoni A., Besancenet C., This P., Giami

A. et al.: “Prevalence and associated factors of sexual problems after early-stage breast cancer treatment: results of a French exploratory survey”. Psychooncology, 2011, 20, 841.

[27] Dizon D.S.: “Quality of life after breast cancer: survivorship and sexuality”. Breast J., 2009, 15, 500.

[28] Walker R.A., Lees E., Webb M.B., Dearing S.J.: “Breast carcinomas occurring in young women (< 35 years) are different”. Br. J. Cancer, 1996, 74, 1796.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top