Article Data

  • Views 374
  • Dowloads 128

Reviews

Open Access

Systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinical Stage II endometrial carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

  • T.N. Schuurman1
  • A. Stiekema2
  • J.H. Schagen van Leeuwen1,*,
  • R.H.M. Verheijen3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

2Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht,, The Netherlands

3University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201205530 Vol.33,Issue 5,September 2012 pp.530-533

Published: 10 September 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): J.H. Schagen van Leeuwen E-mail: j.schagen@antoniusziekentuis.nl

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this case report and review of the literature was to evaluate the effect of adding pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy to hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) on the five year recurrence-free survival in patients with clinical Stage II endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: A Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library search was performed to identify relevant articles. After screening, using predetermined exclusion and inclusion criteria, and critical appraisal, a final of four articles remained. Results: This search only revealed studies with a retrospective design. Two articles showed a significant disease-specific survival benefit in patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy for Stage II endometrial carcinoma. In multivariate analyses, conducted in both studies, this improvement in survival was also evident (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69 - 0.81, p < 0.001 and HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 - 0.93, p = 0.0096). The remaining studies revealed a non-significant ten-year recurrence-free survival (77% vs 65%) and five-year overall survival (72% vs 70%) in favour of patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy. Conclusion: The practise of performing a systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinical Stage II endometrial carcinoma as advocated in guidelines, is not based on evidence from randomised clinical trials. However, lymph node dissection seems to improve the five-year disease-specific survival in retrospective studies.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Stage II

Cite and Share

T.N. Schuurman,A. Stiekema,J.H. Schagen van Leeuwen,R.H.M. Verheijen. Systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinical Stage II endometrial carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(5);530-533.

References

[1] Dutch Cancer Registration. http://www.ikcnet.nl/page.php?id=114. Accessed 30 January 2011.

[2] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[3] Van Lankveld M.A.L., Koot N.C.M., Peeters P.H.M., Schagen van Leeuwen J., Jürgenliemk-Schulz I.M., Van Eijkeren M.A.: “Compliance to surgical and radiation treatment guidelines in relation to patient outcome in early stage endometrial cancer”. J. Eval. Clin. Pract., 2006, 12, 196.

[4] Kilgore L.C., Partridge E.E., Alvarez R.D., Austin J.M., Shingleton H.M., Noojin F. et al.: “Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 56, 29.

[5] Cragun J.M., Havrilesky L.J., Calingaert B., Synan I., Secord A.A., Soper J.T. et al.: “Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 3668.

[6] Watanabe Y., Satou T., Nakai H., Etoh T., Dote K., Fujinami N. et al.: “Evaluation of parametrial spread in endometrial carcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 116, 1027.

[7] Dutch Concept Guideline Endometrial Carcinoma. December 2010.

[8] Kitchener H., Redman C.W., Smart A.M., Amos C.L., ASTEC Study Group. ASTEC: “A study in the treatment of endometrial cancer: a randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 9658:125.

[9] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto L.A., Signorelli M., Scambia G. et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[10] Mencaglia L., Valle R.F., Lurain J.: “Endometrial carcinoma and precursors: diagnosis and treatment”. Isis Medical Media, 1999.

[11] Leminen A., Forss M., Lehtovirta P.: “Endometrial adenocarcinoma with clinical evidence of cervical involvement: accuracy of diagnostic procedures, clinical course and prognostic factors”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1995, 74, 61.

[12] Chan J.K., Wu H., Cheung M., Shin J., Osann K., Kapp D. et al.: “The outcomes of 27.063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 106, 282.

[13] Selvaggi L., Loizzi M., Lorusso M., Demitri P., Cormio G.: “Lymphadenectomy versus no lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 410 patients”. J. Gynecol. Surgery, 2010, 26, 2.

[14] Smith D.C., Macdonald O., Lee C., Gaffney D.: “Survival impact of lymph node dissection in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 255.

[15] Trimble E.L., Kosary C., Park R.C.: “Lymph node sampling and survival in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 71, 340.

[16] Sartori E., Gadducci A., Landoni F.: “Clinical behavior of 203 clinical Stage II endometrial cancer cases: the impact of primary surgical approach and of adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2001, 11, 430.

[17] Chan J.K., Cheung M.K., Huh W.K., Osann K., Husain A., Teng N.N. et al.: “Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12.333 patients”. Cancer, 2006, 107, 1823.

[18] Lutman C.V., Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Secord A.A., Calingaert B., Berchuck A. et al.: “Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO Stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 102, 92.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top