Article Data

  • Views 361
  • Dowloads 100

Original Research

Open Access

Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with endometrial carcinoma

  • E. Yayci1,*,
  • K. Güzin2
  • N. Suer2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Near East University School of Medicine, Nicosia, TRNC, Turkey

2Department of Obgyn, Goztepe Traihing Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201205480 Vol.33,Issue 5,September 2012 pp.480-484

Published: 10 September 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): E. Yayci E-mail: info@eyupyayci.dr.tr

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods: The study group consisted of 37 women with endometrial carcinoma who underwent preoperative workup, including MRI, and surgical staging at Goztepe Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. We collected clinical, MRI, surgical and histopathological data of the study subjects from patients' charts. Results: The mean patient age was 57 years (range 39-76 years). Of the subjects, 32 (86.5%) had endometrioid carcinoma. After histopathological evaluation, we found that four (10.8%) patients had no myometrial invasion, 14 (37.8%) had superficial myometrial invasion, and 19 (51.3%) had deep myometrial invasion. Overall, the accuracy of MRI staging increased in accordance with the increase of surgical stage of endometrial carcinoma. Overall, clinical success of MRI staging was higher in patients with deep myometrial invasion. Conclusion: The accuracy of MRI to depict the depth of myometrial invasion increases in accordance with surgical stage in patients with endometrial cancer. The combination of MRI and clinical findings may be helpful in determining the extent of surgery.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myometrial invasion

Cite and Share

E. Yayci,K. Güzin,N. Suer. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(5);480-484.

References

[1] Amant F., Moerman P., Neven P., Timmerman D., Van Limbergen E., Vergote I.: “Endometrial cancer”. Lancet, 2005, 366, 491.

[2] Arafa M., Somja J., Dehan P., Kridelka F., Goffin F., Boniver J., Delvenne P.: “Current concepts in the pathology and epigenetics of endometrial carcinoma”. Pathology, 2010, 42, 613.

[3] Chen L., Berek J.S.: “Endometrial cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis, and screening”. In: UpToDate, Falk SJ (ed.), UpToDate, Waltham, MA, 2011.

[4] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103.

[5] Hardesty L.A., Sumkin J.H., Nath M.E., Edwards R.P., Price F.V., Chang T.S. et al.: “Use of preoperative MR imaging in the management of endometrial carcinoma: cost analysis”. Radiology, 2000, 215, 45.

[6] Hricak H., Rubinstein L.V., Gherman G.M., Karstaedt N.: “MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study”. Radiology, 1991, 179, 829.

[7] Sironi S., Taccagni G., Garancini P., Belloni C., Del Maschio A.: “Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment by MR imaging”. AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol., 1992, 158, 565.

[8] Sironi S., Colombo E., Villa G., Taccagni G., Belloni C., Garancini P. et al.: “Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging”. Radiology, 1992, 185, 207.

[9] Takahashi S., Murakami T., Narumi Y., Kurachi H., Tsuda K., Kim T. et al.: “Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2- weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging”. Radiology, 1998, 206, 539.

[10] Cabrita S., Rodrigues H., Abreu R., Martins M., Teixeira L., Marques C. et al.: “Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2008, 29, 135.

[11] Yahata T., Aoki Y., Tanaka K.: “Prediction of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasonography, and gross visual inspection”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2007, 28, 193.

[12] Zarbo G., Caruso G., Caruso S., Mangano U., Zarbo R.: “Endometrial cancer: preoperative evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2000, 21, 95.

[13] Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K.K., Segal M.R., Lu Y., Powell C.B. et al.: “Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a metaanalysis”. Radiology, 1999, 212, 711.

[14] Frei K.A., Kinkel K., Bonel H.M., Lu Y., Zaloudek C., Hricak H.: “Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging – a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis”. Radiology, 2000, 216, 444.

[15] Chung H.H., Kang S.B., Cho J.Y., Kim J.W., Park N.H., Song Y.S. et al.: “Accuracy of MR imaging for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 104, 654.

[16] Zullo F., Palomba S., Falbo A., Russo T., Mocciaro R., Tartaglia E. et al.: “Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 200, 296.

[17] Lee C.L., Han C.M., Su H., Wu K.Y., Wang C.J., Yen C.F.: “Robotassisted laparoscopic staging surgery for endometrial cancer – a preliminary report”. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 49, 401.

[18] Ryoo U.N., Choi C.H., Yoon J.Y., Noh S.K., Kang H., Kim W.Y. et al.: “MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the prediction of myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis”. Cancer Res. Treat., 2007, 39, 165.

[19] Karlsson B., Granberg S., Wikland M., Ylöstalo P., Torvid K., Marsal K., Valentin L.: “Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding – a Nordic multicenter study”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 172, 1488.

[20] Briley M., Lindsell D.R.: “The role of transvaginal ultrasound in the investigation of women with post-menopausal bleeding”. Clin. Radiol., 1998, 53, 502.

[21] Russell A.H., Anderson M., Walter J., Kinney W., Smith L., Scudder S.: “The integration of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in treatment planning for gynecologic cancer”. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 35, 55.

[22] Saksouk F.A., Al-Kadhi Y.A.: “Endometrial carcinoma imaging”. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/403578- overview#a01.

[23] Grasel R.P., Outwater E.K., Siegelman E.S., Capuzzi D., Parker L., Hussain S.M.: “Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma”. Radiology, 2000, 214, 47.

[24] Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K.K., Segal M.R., Lu Y., Powell C.B., Hricak H.: “Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis”. Radiology, 1999, 212, 711.

[25] Frei K.A., Kinkel K., Bonél H.M., Lu Y., Zaloudek C., Hricak H.: “Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging-a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis”. Radiology, 2000, 216, 444.

[26] Utsunomiya D., Notsute S., Hayashida Y., Lwakatare F., Katabuchi H., Okamura H. et al.: “Endometrial carcinoma in adenomyosis: assessment of myometrial invasion on T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2004, 182, 399.

[27] Beddy P., Moyle P., Kataoka M., Yamamoto A.K., Joubert I., Lomas D. et al.: “Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusionweighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging”. Radiology, 2012, 262, 530.

[28] Lin G., Ng K.K., Chang C.J., Wang J.J., Ho K.C., Yen T.C. et al.: “Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging-initial experience”. Radiology, 2009, 250, 784.

[29] Nasi F., Fiocchi F., Pecchi A., Rivasi F., Torricelli P.: “MRI evaluation of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma. Comparison between fast-spin-echo T2w and coronal-FMPSPGR Gadolinium-Dota-enhanced sequences”. Radiol. Med., 2005, 110, 199.

[30] Frei K.A., Kinkel K.: “Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging., 2001, 13, 850.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top