Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital Bologna, Italy
2Department of Pathology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
*Corresponding Author(s): A.M. Perrone E-mail: amperrone@libero.it
Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, long-term safety, disease-free survival, and overall survival of the laparoscopic (LPS) approach to early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) compared to the traditional laparotomic approach. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data of patients who underwent primary surgery from 1997 to 2009. We recorded clinical parameters, surgical stage, histological type, operative and pen-operative complications, time to resumption of normal functions, conversion to laparotomy, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results: LPS, did not increase operative risk and pen-operative complications even in obese and older women. The number of pelvic lymph and aortic nodes removed was similar for the two groups. One hundred and eight patients had a follow-up of 60 months. The two groups were similar for disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach to EC provides a reduction in postoperative complications and hospital stay compared to the laparotomic approach.
Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Hysterectomy
A.M. Perrone,B. Di Marcoberardino,M. Rossi,F. Pozzati,A. Pellegrini,M. Procaccini,D. Santini,P. De Iaco. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(4);376-381.
[1] Ries L.A., Wingo P.A., Miller D.S., Howe H.L., Weir H.K., Rosenberg H.M., Vernon S.W.: “The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer”. Cancer, 2000, 88, 2398.
[2] Edwards B.K., Munstedt K., Grant P., Woenckhaus J., Roth G., Tinneberg H.R.: “Cancer of the endometrium: current aspects of diagnostics and treatment”. World J. Surg. Oncol., 2004, 2, 24.
[3] Brinton L.A., Sakoda L.C., Frederiksen K., Sherman M.E., Kiaer S.K., Graubard B.I. et al.: “Relationship of uterine and ovarian tumors to pre-existing chronic conditions”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 487.
[4] Purdie D.M., Green A.C.: “Epidemiology of endometrial cancer”. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gynaecol., 2001, 15, 341.
[5] Creasman W.T.: “Announcement: FIGO stages-1988 revisions”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 35, 125.
[6] Barakat R.R., Lev G., Hummer A.J., Sonada Y., Chi D.S., Alektiar K.M. et al.: “Twelve-year experience in the management of endometrial cancer: a change in surgical and postoperative radiation approaches”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 150.
[7] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S. et al.: “Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (LAP 2)”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 5331.
[8] Gehrig P.A., Cantrell L.A., Shafer A., Abaid L.N., Mendivil A., Boggess J.F.: “What is the optimal minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 41.
[9] Scribner D.R., Walker J.L., Johnson G.A., McMeekin S.D., Gold M.A., Mannel R.S.: “Surgicalmanagement of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 83, 536.
[10] Magrina J.F.: “Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 17, 343.
[11] Mercuriali F., Inghilleri G., Biffi E., Colotti M.T., Vinci A., Scalamogna R., Zanella A.: “Erythropoietin treatment to increase autologous blood donation in patients with low basal hematocrit undergoing elective orthopedic surgery”. Clin. Investig., 1994, 72 (6 suppl.), S16.
[12] Perrone A.M., Casadio P., Formelli G., Levorato M., Ghi T., Costa S et al.: “Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 62.
[13] Eid I., Birch D.W., Sharma A.M., Sherman V., Karmali S.: “Complications associated with adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a surgeon’s guides”. Can J. Surg., 2011, 54, 61.
[14] Nguyen N.T., Wolfe B.M.: “The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese”. Ann. Surg., 2005, 241, 219.
[15] Pellegrino A., Signorelli M., Fruscio R., Villa A., Buda A., Beretta P. et al.: “Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy in obese women with Stage I endometrial cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2009, 279, 655.
[16] Scribner D.R. Jr., Walker J.L., Johnson G.A., McMeekin S.D., Gold M.A., Mannel R.S.: “Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 83, 563.
[17] Palomba S., Falbo A., Mocciaro R., Russo T., Zullo F.: “Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 415.
[18] Santi A., Kuhn A., Gyr T., Eberhard M., Johann S., Günthert A.R., Mueller M.D.: “Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer”. Surg. Endosc., 2010, 24, 939.
[19] Zorlu C.G., Simsek T., Ari E.S.: “Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer”. JSLS, 2005, 9, 442.
[20] Zullo F., Palomba S., Russo T., Falbo A., Costantino M., Tolino A. et al.: “A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 193, 1344.
[21] Tozzi R., Malur S., Koehler C., Schneider A.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer:first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2005, 12, 130.
[22] Fram K.M.: “Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in Stage I endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2002, 12, 57.
[23] Malzoni M., Tinelli R., Cosentino F., Perone C., Rasile M., Iuzzolino D. et al.: “Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 126.
[24] Eltabbakh G.H., Shamonki M.I., Moody J.M., Garafano L.L.: “Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma”. Cancer, 2001, 91, 378.
[25] Gregor H., Sam C.E., Reinthaller A., Joura E.A.: “Port site metastases after laparoscopic lymph node staging of cervical carcinoma”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 2001, 8, 591.
[26] Ramirez P.T., Wolf J.K., Levenback C.: “Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 91, 179.
[27] Martínez A., Querleu D., Leblanc E., Narducci F., Ferron G.: “Low incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic staging of uterine cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 118, 145.
[28] Spirtos N.M., Schlaerth J.B., Gross G.M., Spirtos T.W., Schlaerth A.C., Ballon S.C.: “Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer: laparotomy versus laparoscopy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 174, 1795.
[29] Mourits M.J.E., Bijen C.B., Arts H.J., Brugge H.G., Sijde R., Paulsen L. et al.: “Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 763.
[30] Janda M., Gebski V., Brand A., Hogg R., Jobling T.W., Land R. et al.: “Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for Stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 772.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top