Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
“Low-grade positivity” of HPV viral load after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology identifies women at low-risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3
1Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Milano, Italy
2Preventive Gynecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milano, Italy
3Department of Microbiology and Virology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine at San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
*Corresponding Author(s): M. Origoni E-mail: massimo.origoni@hsr.it
The correlation between high-risk HPV-DNA viral load, expressed as relative light units (RLU) values obtained from the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test, and the prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 was investigated and statistically analyzed in 614 ASC-US consecutive cases. Cases were categorized into three groups according to RLU values: "low-grade positivity", "intermediate positivity" and "high-grade positivity", and the prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 was evaluated in the single groups and compared among them. CIN/CIN3 rates demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) increase with a direct correlation with increasing RLU values: 4.6% (RLU from 1.0 to 10.0), 9.1% (RLU from 11.0 to 100.0) and 32.2% (RLU > 100.0) respectively. The prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 between the group with RLU < 10.0 (4.6%) and the group with RLU > 10 (24.2%) showed statistical significance (p = 0.0002). Increasing hrHPV viral load significantly correlates with increasing prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 in ASC-US cases.
ASC-US; HPV; HPV-DNA; viral load; HC2; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; CIN
M. Origoni,G. Carminati,M. Sideri,M. Clementi,S. Rolla,M. Candiani. “Low-grade positivity” of HPV viral load after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology identifies women at low-risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(3);261-264.
[1] Waggoner S.E.: “Cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2003, 361, 2217.
[2] Mathew A., George P.S.: “Trends in incidence and mortality ratesod squamous cell carcinoma and adenocacrcinoma of cervix-worldwide”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2009, 10, 645.
[3] Solomon D., Schiffman M., Tarone R., ALTS Study group: “Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2001, 93, 293.
[4] Wang J., Wu M., Zhang S., Li C., Zhang W.: “Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from cervical pap smears in Beijing”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2011, 32, 411.
[5] Poomtavorn Y., Suwannarurk K., Thaweekul Y., Maireang K.: “Risk factors for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) papanicolaou smears”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2011, 12, 235.
[6] Runowicz C.D.: “Molecular screening for cervical cancer - time to give up Pap test?”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1650.
[7] Wright T.C. Jr., Cox J.T., Massad L.S., Twiggs L.B., Wilkinson E.J. 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference: “2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 197, 346.
[8] Arbyn M., Sasieni P., Meijer C.J., Clavel C., Koliopoulos G., Dillner J. Chapter 9: “Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses”. Vaccine, 2006, 24 (suppl. 3), S3/78.
[9] The ASCUS-Low SIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group: “Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance”. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol., 2003, 188, 1383.
[10] Xu Y., Dotto J., Hui Y., Lawton K., Schofield K., Hui P.: “High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and viral load of high-risk human papillomavirus: significant correlations in patients of 22 years old or younger”. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2009, 2, 169.
[11] Flores R., Papenfuss M., Klimecki W.T., Giuliano A.R.: “Crosssectional analysis of oncogenic HPV viral load and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Int. J. Cancer, 2006, 118, 1187.
[12] Tsai H.T., Wu C.H., Lai H.L., Li R.N., Tung Y.C., Chuang H.Y. et al.: “Association between quantitative high-risk human papillomavirus DNA load and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm risk”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev., 2005 (11 Pt 1), 2544.
[13] Cuzick J., Beverley E., Ho L., Terry G., Sapper H., Mielzynska I. et al.: “HPV testing in primary screening of older women”. Br. J. Cancer, 1999, 81, 554.
[14] Runowicz C.D.: “Molecular screening for cervical cancer - time to give up Pap test?”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1650.
[15] Lorincz A.T., Castle P.E., Sherman M.E., Scott D.R., Glass A.G., Wacholder S. et al.: “Viral load of human papillomavirus and risk of CIN3 or cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2002, 360, 228.
[16] Sherman M.E., Wang S.S., Wheeler C.M., Rich L., Gravitt P.E., Tarone R., Schiffman M.: “Determinants of human papillomavirus load among women with histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: dominant impact of surrounding low-grade lesions”. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2003, 12, 1038.
[17] Dane C., Batmaz G., Dane B., Cetin A.: “Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion tests: a prospective study”. Ann. Diagn. Pathol., 2009, 13, 73.
[18] Ordi J., Alonso I., Torné A., Esteve R., Sierra E., Campo E., Puig-Tintoré L.M.: “Human papillomavirus load in Hybrid Capture II assay: does increasing the cutoff improve the test?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 313.
[19] Sargent A., Bailey A., Turner A., Almonte M., Gilham C., Baysson H. et al.: “Optimal threshold for a positive hybrid capture 2 test for detection of human papillomavirus: data from the ARTISTIC trial”. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2010, 48, 554.
[20] Castle P.E., Lorincz A.T., Mielzynska-Lohnas J., Scott D.R., Glass A.G., Sherman M.E. et al.: “Results of human papillomavirus DNA testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 assay are reproducible”. J Clin Microbiol., 2002, 40, 1088.
[21] De Cremoux P., Coste J., Sastre-Garau X., Thioux M., Bouillac C., Labbe S. et al.: “Efficiency of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology”. Am J Clin Pathol., 2003, 120, 492.
[22] Jarboe E.A., Venkat P., Hirsch M.S., Cibas E.S., Crum C.P., Garner E.I.: “A weakly positive human papillomavirus Hybrid Capture II result correlates with a significantly lower risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3 after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology”. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis., 2010, 14, 174.
[23] Khan M.J., Castle P.E., Lorincz A.T., Wacholder S., Sherman M., Scott D.R. et al.: “The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2005, 97, 1072.
[24] Yoshida T., Sano T., Kanuma T., Inoue H., Itoh T., Yazaki C. et al.: “Usefulness of CINtec PLUS p16/Ki-67 Double-Staining in Cytological Screening of Cervical Cancer”. Acta Cytol., 2011, 55, 413.
Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
Google Scholar
JournalSeek
Top