Article Data

  • Views 424
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer

  • G. Kilic1,*,
  • J. England1
  • M. Borahay1
  • D. Pedraza1
  • D. Freeman2
  • R. Snyder1
  • A.K. Ertan3

1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA

2Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Office of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Leverkusen gGmbH, Leverkusen, Germany

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201202183 Vol.33,Issue 2,March 2012 pp.183-186

Published: 10 March 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): G. Kilic E-mail: gokilic@utmb.edu

Abstract

Purpose: To compare physician and nurse practitioner accuracy in recognizing cervical dysplasia during colposcopy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of cervical excisional biopsies from 2007 to 2009 performed by gynecologists and nurse practitioners in the same patient population. Cervical cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) pathology were used as a gold standard compared to the previous colposcopy biopsies. Results: Four hundred fifty-five patients qualified for the study. Patients were stratified according to age: under 30 years, 30-39, and 40 and above. For physicians, 77% of high-grade colposcopy biopsy results agreed with high-grade pathology on cone biopsy or LEEP. This was statistically similar to nurse practitioner results (p = 0.12). Likewise, there was no significant difference between physician and nurse practitioner accuracy within the various patient age strata. Conclusion: Colposcopy biopsy results compared to cone biopsy or LEEP results were statistically similar between gynecologists and nurse practitioners.

Keywords

Colposcopy; Colposcopic training; Cervical dysplasia; LEEP; Cold knife conization

Cite and Share

G. Kilic,J. England,M. Borahay,D. Pedraza,D. Freeman,R. Snyder,A.K. Ertan. Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(2);183-186.

References

[1] ACOG Practice Bulletin #109, December 2009.

[2] American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2010. http://www5.cancer.org/downloads/STT/Cancer_Facts_and_Figures_2010.pdf. Accessed February 21, 2011.

[3] Quinn M., Babb P., Jones J., Allen E.: “Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics”. BMJ, 1999, 318, 904.

[4] Cox J.T.: “More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention?”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 111, 1266.

[5] Baum M.E., Rader J.S., Gibb R.K., McAllister R.B., Powell M.A., Mutch D.G. et al.: “Colposcopic accuracy of obstetrics and gynecology residents”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 966.

[6] Caruthers B.S., Sheets K.J.: “Development of a curriculum in colposcopy”. J. Fam. Pract., 1991, 32, 590.

[7] Brotzman G.L., Apgar B.S.: “Assessing colposcopic skills: the instructor’s handbook”. Fam. Med., 1998, 30, 350.

[8] Spitzer M., Apgar B.S., Brotzman G.L., Krumholz B.A.: “Residency training in colposcopy: a survey of program directors in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 185, 507.

[9] Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Educational objectives: core curriculum in obstetrics and gynecology. 8th edition, New York, NY: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005.

[10] American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Comprehensive Curriculum. http://www.asccp.org/EducationeLearning/ComprehensiveColposcopyCurriculum/tabid/5974/Default.asp x. Updated July 6, 2011. Accessed July 11, 2011.

[11] Waxman A.G., Rubin M.M., Apgar B.S., Krumholz B.A., Tedeschi C., Potter M.E.: “Essentials of colposcopy education: the curriculum revised”. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis., 2003, 7, 221.

[12] Prendiville W.: “The treatment of CIN: What are the risks?”. Cytopathology, 2009, 20, 145.

[13] Massad L.S., Jeronimo J., Schiffman M.: “National Institutes of Health/American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (NIH/ASCCP) Research Group Interobserver Agreement in the Assessment of Components of Colposcopic Grading”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 111, 1279.

[14] The ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group: “Results of a randomized study on the management of cytology interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 188, 1383.

[15] Fleiss J.L.: “Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions”. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981, Chapter 13.

[16] Gage J.C., Hanson V.W., Abbey K., Dippery S., Gardner S., Kubota J. et al., ASCUS LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group: “Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 108, 264.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top