Article Data

  • Views 346
  • Dowloads 122

Original Research

Open Access

Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrioid endometrial cancer

  • M. Cusidó1,*,
  • F. Fargas1
  • I. Rodríguez2
  • A. Alsina1
  • S. Baulies1
  • F. Tresserra3
  • A. Martínez4
  • J.F. Ibiza5
  • R.F. Xaudaró1

1Department of Gynaecology, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

2Epidemiology Unit, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

3Department of Pathological Anatomy, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

4Image Diagnosis Unit, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

5Radiation Oncology Unit, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201101049 Vol.32,Issue 1,January 2011 pp.49-53

Published: 10 January 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Cusidó E-mail: maicus@dexeus.com

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk factors associated with node involvement. Study design: In the period 1990-2008 a total of 265 endometrial cancers were treated in the Institut Universitari Dexeus. We analysed the rate of myometrial invasion, tumour grade, histological type and node involvement. Results: Overall, 86% of tumours were endometrioid, 5.3% papillary serous, 4.9% mixed and 2.6% endometrial stroma sarcoma. Among those with endometrioid histology, lymphadenectomy was not performed (NL) in 85 cases (37.2%), whereas pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) or pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) was carried out in 84 (36.84%) and 59 patients (25.87%), respectively. In NL patients the overall disease-free survival (DFS) rate at five years was 92.8%. In the PL group, node involvement was observed in 2.4% of cases and the five-year DFS rate was 92.3%. Among PAL patients, 18.6% showed node involvement (72.7% positive pelvic nodes and 63.6% aortic). Aortic involvement was present in 5.9% of cases when there was no pelvic disease, whereas in the presence of positive pelvic nodes the rate of aortic involvement was 50%. The DFS rate at five years was 93.6%. Referring to the risk factors, when infiltration was > 50% of the myometrium, lymph node involvement occurred in 37% of cases and G3 tumors in 45.5%. Conclusions: Node involvement is more commonly observed in cases with > 50% myometrial invasion and G3, accounting for 25% of cases that can be considered as at-risk patients. When node involvement is present it is equally distributed between the pelvic and aortic levels. As node involvement is a predictive factor for distant metastasis, the 25% of patients considered to be at risk should undergo pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Management; Paraaortic lymph node; Pelvic lymph node

Cite and Share

M. Cusidó,F. Fargas,I. Rodríguez,A. Alsina,S. Baulies,F. Tresserra,A. Martínez,J.F. Ibiza,R.F. Xaudaró. Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrioid endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2011. 32(1);49-53.

References

[1] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Haddock M.G., Keeney

G. L., Lesnick T.G. et al.: “Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 200.

[2] Keys H.M., Roberts J.A., Brunetto V.L., Zaino R.J., Spirtos N.M., Bloss J.D. et al.: “Gynecologic Oncology Group. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 744. Erratum in: Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 241.

[3] Creutzberg C.L.: “GOG-99: ending the controversy regarding pelvic radiotherapy for endometrial carcinoma?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 740.

[4] Siu S.S., Lo K.W., Cheung T.H., Yim S.F., Chung T.K.: “Is aortic lymphadenectomy necessary in the management of endometrial carcinoma?”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2007, 28, 98.

[5] Boronow R.C., Morrow C.P., Creasman W.T., DiSaia P.J., Silverberg S.G., Miller A. et al.: “Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1984, 63, 825.

[6] Richard C. Boronow.: “Endometrial cancer and lymph node surgery: the spins continue. A case for reason”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 3.

[7] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C., Lybeert M.L., Jobsen J.J., Wárlám-Rodenhuis C.C. et al.: “PORTEC (Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma) Study Group. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial”. Lancet, 2000, 355, 1404.

[8] The writing committee on behalf of the ASTEC study group. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[9] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Beller U., Benedet J. L., Heintz A.P. et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri”. J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 2001, 6, 47.

[10] Podratz K.C., Mariani A., Webb M.J.: “Staging and therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 70, 163.

[11] Orr Jr J.W., Holimon J.L., Orr P.F.: “Stage I corpus cancer: is teletherapy necessary?”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1997, 176, 777.

[12] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Galli L., Podratz K.C.: “Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 76, 348.

[13] Bristow R.E., Zahurak M.L., Alexander C.J., Zellars R.C., Montz F. J.: “FIGO Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: resection of macroscopic nodal disease and other determinants of survival”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2003, 13, 664.

[14] Cragun J.M., Havrilesky L.J., Calingaert B., Synan I., Secord A.A., Soper J.T. et al.: “Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 3668.

[15] Abu-Rustum N.R., Iasonos A., Zhou Q., Oke E., Soslow R.A., Alektiar K.M. et al.: “Is there a therapeutic impact to regional lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma?”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 198, 457.

[16] Chan J.K., Cheung M.K., Huh W.K., Osann K., Husain A., Teng N.N. et al.: “Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients”. Cancer, 2006, 107, 1823.

[17] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Haddock M.G., Keeney

G. L., Lesnick T.G. et al.: “Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 200.

[18] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G. et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[19] Höckel M., Dornhöfer N.: “Treatment of early endometrial carcinoma: is less more?”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 97.

[20] Amant F., Neven P., Vergote I.: “Lymphaedectomy in endometrial cancer” - Author’s reply. Lancet, 2009, 373, 1170 .

[21] Hakmi A.: “Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer” - Author’s reply. Lancet, 2009, 373, 1170.

[22] Mourits M.J., Bijen C.B., de Bock G.H.: “Lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer” - Author’s reply. Lancet, 2009, 373, 1170.

[23] Nout R.A., Putter H., Jürgenliemk-Schulz I.M., Jobsen J.J., Lutgens L.C., van der Steen-Banasik E.M. et al.: “Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: first results ofthe randomized PORTEC-2 trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 3547.

[24] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Wilson T.O., Podratz K.C.: “Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 11.

[25] Nomura H., Aoki D., Suzuki N., Susumu N., Suzuki A., Tamada Y. et al.: “Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 799.

[26] Cragun J.M., Havrilesky L.J., Calingaert B., Synan I., Secord A.A., Soper J.T. et al.: “Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 3668.

[27] Orr J.W.: “Surgical management of endometrial cancer: how much is enough?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 1.

[28] Orr J.W., Naumann W.R., Escobar P.: “Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference”. Winston Churchill, Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 147.

[29] Orr J.W.: “Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: does the patient benefit?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 71, 335.

[30] Case A.S., Rocconi R.P., Straughn Jr. J.M., Conner M., Novak L., Wang W., Huh W.K.: “Prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 108, 1375.

[31] Tresserra F., Martinez M.A., Kanjou N., Cusidó M., Fabregas R., Labastida R.: “Intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrioid adenocarcinoma”. Arch. Virchow., 2008, 452 (suppl. 1), 77.

[32] Petru E., Lück H.J., Stuart G., Gaffney D., Millan D., Vergote I.: “Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) proposals for changes of the current FIGO staging system”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2009, 143, 69.

[33] Selman T.J., Mann C.H., Zamora J., Khan K.S.: “A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer”. BMC Women’s Health, 2008, 8.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top