Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Referral and ascertainment bias in patients with synchronous and metachronous endometrial malignancy
1Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
2Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
4Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
5Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
6Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (USA)
Academic Editor: A. Mariani
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20100105 Vol.31,Issue 1,January 2010 pp.5-9
Published: 10 January 2010
*Corresponding Author(s): A. Mariani E-mail: mariani.andrea@mayo.edu
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency in patients with endometrial cancer of other malignancies and the influence of referral and ascertainment biases on these associations. Analysis of 1,028 local and referred patients who had a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was based on residence at the time of diagnosis. Altogether, 208 patients had a history of another malignancy, most frequently breast, colon, and ovary. At the time of surgery for endometrial cancer, the prevalence of lymphoma and breast and ovarian cancers was greater than expected although the higher prevalence of lymphoma was limited to referred patients. During followup after hysterectomy, the incidence of lung cancer was lower than expected, whereas the incidence of lymphoma was higher. Breast, colorectal, and bladder cancers were more common than expected although this finding was limited to local patients. We concluded that results of epidemiologic studies from tertiary care centers may be misleading if they do not account for referral and ascertainment biases.
Ascertainment bias; Endometrial cancer; Epidemiology; Multiple malignancies; Referral bias.
A. Mariani,S.S. Cha,E.J. Bergstralh,L.A. Boardman,S.C. Dowdy,G.L. Keeney,K.C. Podratz,L.J. Melton III. Referral and ascertainment bias in patients with synchronous and metachronous endometrial malignancy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2010. 31(1);5-9.
[1] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Thun M.J.: “Cancer statistics”. C.A. Cancer J. Clin., 2007, 57, 43.
[2] Aarnio M., Mecklin J.P., Aaltonen L.A., Nystrom-Lahti M., Jarvinen H.J.: “Life-time risk of different cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome”. Int. J. Cancer, 1995, 64, 430.
[3] Annegers J.F., Malkasian G.D. Jr.: “Patterns of other neoplasia in patients with endometrial carcinoma”. Cancer, 1981, 48, 856.
[4] Axelrod J.H., Fruchter R., Boyce J.G.: “Multiple primaries among gynecologic malignancies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1984, 18, 359.
[5] Herrinton L.J., Voigt L.F., Weiss N.S., Beresford S.A., Wingo P.A.: “Risk factors for synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers”. Ann. Epidemiol., 2001, 11, 529.
[6] Re A., Taylor T.H., DiSaia P.J., Anton-Culver H.: “Risk for breast and colorectal cancers subsequent to cancer of the endometrium in a population-based case series”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 66, 255.
[7] Hemminki K., Aaltonen L., Li X.: “Subsequent primary malignancies after endometrial carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma”. Cancer, 2003, 97, 2432.
[8] Malkasian G.D., Annegers J.F.: “Endometrial carcinoma comparison of Olmsted County and Mayo Clinic referral patients”. Mayo Clin. Proc., 1980, 55, 614.
[9] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Keeney G.L., Long H.J., Lesnick T.G., Podratz K.C.: “High-risk endometrial cancer subgroups: candidates for target-based adjuvant therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 95, 120.
[10] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Keeney G.L., Haddock M.G., Lesnick T. G., Podratz K.C.: “Predictors of vaginal relapse in stage I endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 97, 820.
[11] Melton L.J. 3rd.: “The threat to medical-records research”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1997, 337, 1466.
[12] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Beller U., Benedet J.L., Heintz A.P. et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri”. J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 2001, 6, 47.
[13] Scully R.E., Bonfiglio T.A., Kurman R.J., Silverberg S.G., Wilkinson E.J. (eds.): “World Health Organization International Histological Classification of Tumours: Histological Typing of Female Genital Tract Tumours”. 2nd edition, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, c1994, 13.
[14] Ulbright T.M., Roth L.M.: “Metastatic and independent cancers of the endometrium and ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases”. Hum. Pathol., 1985, 16, 28.
[15] SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2000 [Internet] [cited 2004 May 10]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov.
[16] Bergstralh E., Offord K.P., Kosanke J.J., Augustine G.: “Technical report series no. 31, PERSONYRS: a SAS procedure for person year analyses”. Rochester (MN), Department of Health Sciences Research, 1986.
[17] Maruyama A., Miyamoto S., Saito T., Kondo H., Baba H., Tsukamoto N.: “Clinicopathologic and familial characteristics of endometrial carcinoma with multiple primary carcinomas in relation to the loss of protein expression of MSH2 and MLH1”. Cancer, 2001, 91, 2056.
[18] Maximov S.J., Bokhman J.B.: “Syndrome of primary multiple endometrial, breast, ovarian and colon adenocarcinoma”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 1993, 14, 109.
[19] Santos M.C., Gardner B., Feldman J.: “Analysis of multiple primary cancers in a single institution”. J. Surg. Oncol., 1994, 55, 95.
[20] Schwartz Z., Ohel G., Birkenfeld A., Anteby S.O., Schenker J.G.: “Second primary malignancy in endometrial carcinoma patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1985, 22, 40.
[21] Thomas L., Doyle L.A., Edelman M.J.: “Lung cancer in women: emerging differences in epidemiology, biology, and therapy”. Chest, 2005, 128, 370.
[22] Viswanathan A.N., Feskanich D., De Vivo I., Hunter D.J., Barbieri R.L., Rosner B. et al.: “Smoking and the risk of endometrial cancer: results from the Nurses’ Health Study”. Int. J. Cancer, 2005, 114, 996.
[23] Beasley M.B., Brambilla E., Travis W.D.: “The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors”. Semin. Roentgenol., 2005, 40, 90.
[24] Liauw S.L., Sylvester J.E., Morris C.G., Blasko J.C., Grimm P.D.: “Second malignancies after prostate brachytherapy: incidence of bladder and colorectal cancers in patients with 15 years of potential follow-up”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2006, 66, 669.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top