Article Data

  • Views 393
  • Dowloads 109

Original Research

Open Access

Improved survival for Stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital between 1984 and 2001

  • H. Oksefjell1,*,
  • B. Sandstad2
  • C. Trope1,3

1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Norway

2Office for Clinical Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital HF, Norway

3University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200704256 Vol.28,Issue 4,July 2007 pp.256-262

Published: 10 July 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): H. Oksefjell E-mail:

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of FIGO Stage IIIC patients who were primarily treated completely or partially at the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH) during a 15-year period in order to discover possibilities for improvement of prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer.

Materials and method: A retrospective study based on record information from all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer Stage IIIC treated at NRH from 1985-2000, in total 776 patients.

Results: We found age, amount of residual tumour after surgery for primary treatment and type of chemotherapy to be the most significant prognostic factors for overall survival. During the last 5-year period primary surgery was increasingly centralised, and surgery was improved with lymph node staging and use of paclitaxel. Survival was significantly better during the last 5-year period and after macroscopic radical surgery. Also progression-free survival was better with no macroscopic tumour remaining.

Interpretation: Improved survival during the last 5-year period is partly attributed to improved surgery and partly to the addition of paclitaxel. We believe that further centralisation of primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer can contribute to a better prognosis.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Survival

Cite and Share

H. Oksefjell,B. Sandstad,C. Trope. Improved survival for Stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital between 1984 and 2001. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2007. 28(4);256-262.

References

[1] Pecorelli S., Benedet J.L., Creasman W.T., Stephard J.H., Petterson F.: Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Vol 23, Oxford, UK, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2002.

[2] Cancer in Norway 2004. The Cancer Registry of Norway. Oslo, Norway.

[3] Bj0rge T., Engeland A., Sundf0r K., Trope C.: "Prognosis of 2800 patients with epithelial ovarian canser diagnosed during 1975-94 and treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital". Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1998, 77, 777.

[4] Aure J.C., Hoeg K., Kolstad P.: "Clinical and histologic studies of ovarian carsinoma. Long term follow-up of 990 cases". Obstet. Gynecol., 1971, 37, 1.

[5] Griffith C.T.: "Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the pnmary treatment of ovarian carsinoma". Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr., 1975, 42, 101.

[6] Lund B., Williamson P.: "Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian carsinoma". Ann. Oneal., 1991, 2, 281.

[7] Hoskins W.J.: "Primary surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer". In: Rubin S.C., Sutton G.P. (eds.). Ovarian cancer. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1993, 241.

[8] Makar A.P., Barkelandt M., Trope C.G., Kristensen G.B.: "The Prognostic Significance of Residual Disease, F IGO Substage, Tumour Histology, and Grade in Patients with FIGO Stage III Ovarian Cancer". Gynecol. Oneal., 1995, 56, 175.

[9] Eisenhauer E.A., Gore M., Neijt J.P.: "Ovarian cancer: Should we be managing patients with good and bad prognostic factors in the same manner?". Ann. Oncol., 1999 (suppl. 1), 9.

[10] Clark T.G., Stewart M.E., Altman D.G., Gabra H., Smyth J.F.: "A prognostic model of ovarian cancer". Br. J. Cancer, 2001, 85, 944.

[11] Bristow R.E. et al.: "Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis". J. Clin. Oneal., 2002, 20, 1248.

[12] Eisenkop S.M., Spirtos N.M., F riedman R.L. et al.: "Relative influences of tumour volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study". Gynecol. Oneal., 2003, 90, 390.

[13] Kaern J., Aghmesheh M., Nesland J.M., Danielsen H.E., Sandstad B., Friedlander M., Trope C.: "Prognostic factors in ovarian carcinoma Stage III patients. Can biomarkers improve the prediction of short- and long-term survivors')". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 1014.

[14] Kristensen G.B., Trope C.: "Epithelial ovarian carcinoma". Lancet, 1997, 349, 113.

[15] Aabo K., Adams M., Adnitt P. et al.: "Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analysis of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists'Group". Br. J. Cancer, 1998, 78, 1479.

[16] Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: an overview of randomised clinical trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists'Group Br. Med. J., 1991, 12, 884.

[17] McGuire W.P., Hoskins W.J.. Brady M.F. et al.: "Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with Stage III and IV ovarian cancer". N. Engl. J. Med., 1996, 334.

[18] Piccart M.J., Bertelsen K., James K. et al.: "Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Three year results". J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 2000, 92, 699.

[19] Neijt J.P., Engholm S.A., Tuxen M.K. et al.: "Exploratory phase III study of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer". J. Klin. Onkol., 2000, 18, 3084.

[20] Ozols R.F., Bundy B.N., Greer B.E. et al.: "Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected Stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study". J. Clin. Oneal., 2003, 21, 3194.

[21]du Bois A., Luck H.J., Meier W. et al.: "A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carbop!atin/paclitaxel as first line treatment of ovarian cancer". J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2003, 95, 1320.

[22] 3''International ovarian cancer consensus of the GCIG. Ann. Oncol., 2005, 16 (suppl. 8), 36.

[23] Tingulstad S., Skjeldestad F.E., Hagen B.: "The effect of centralization of primary surgery on survival in ovarian cancer patients" Ohstet. Gynecol., 2003, 102, 499.

[24] Junor E.J., Hole D.J., McNulty L., Mason M., Young J.: "Spesialist gynecologists and survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a Scottish National Study of 1966 patients". Br. J. Ohstet. Gynecol., 1999, 106, 1130.

[25] Paulsen T., Kjærheim K., Kærn J., Tretli S., Trope C.: "Improved short-time survival for advanced ovarian, tubar and peritoneal cancer patients operated at teaching hospitals". Int. J. Gynecol Cancer, 2006, 16 (suppl. I), 11.

[26] Giede K.C., Kieser K., Dodge J., Rosen B.: "Who should operate on patients with ovarian cancer'J An evidence-based review". Gynecol. Oneal., 2005, 99, 447.

[27] Oksefjell H., Sandstad B., Trope C.: "Ovarian cancer Stage IIIC Consequences of treatment level on overall and progression-free survival". Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oneal., 2006, 27, 209.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top