Article Data

  • Views 390
  • Dowloads 105

Original Research

Open Access

Physicians'attitudes, beliefs and knowledge concerning ovanan cancer

  • L. Elit1,2,*,
  • K. Trim3
  • J. Sussman4

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Canada

2Division of Gynecologic Oncology at the Juravinski Cancer Centre, Canada

3Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, University c)fWestern Ontario, Canada

4Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit at the Juravinski Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20060119 Vol.27,Issue 1,January 2006 pp.19-24

Published: 10 January 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): L. Elit E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: To determine physicians' attitudes, beliefs and knowledge concerning surgical care of women with ovarian cancer.

Methods: A survey was created from items generated from the literature, a focus group and individual interviews. The survey was mailed on two occasions to all practicing gynecologists, general surgeons and urologists in Ontario.

Results: 701 responses were received (overall response rate: 43.7%); 293 were eligible responses. The responses were analyzed in terms of four determinants of surgical care: knowledge, practice patterns, perceived goals of surgery and barriers to accessing surgical care. These variables would be influenced by the surgeon's specialty, access to an oncologist (medical or gynecologic) at one's facility and distance of one's facility to the nearest cancer center with a gynecologic oncologist. Surgeon's specialty and distance from the cancer center influenced both the intraoperative surgical plan and referral practices. The most important goals of surgery were survival and optimal debulking. The barriers to care included available operating time and surgical beds.

Conclusion: We have shown that peer influence has reached a ceiling effect in ovarian cancer and novel approaches are required to ensure appropriate referrals, knowledge transfer and provincial resourcing to expert centers to provide optimal surgical care for women with ovarian cancer.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Beliefs and attitudes; Referral

Cite and Share

L. Elit,K. Trim,J. Sussman. Physicians'attitudes, beliefs and knowledge concerning ovanan cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2006. 27(1);19-24.

References

[1] Eisenkop S.M., Spirtos N.M., Montag T.W., Nalick R.H, Wang H "The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 47, 203.

[2] Nguyen H.N., Averette H.E., Hoskins W., Penalver M., Sevrn B.U., Steren A.: "National survey of ovarian carcinoma Part V. The impact of physician's specialty on patients' survival". Cancer. 1993, 72, 3663.

[3] Junor E.J.: "The impact of specialist training for surgery in ovarian cancer". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2000, IO, 16.

[4] Junor E.J., Hole D.J., McNulty L., Mason M., Young J.: "Specialist gynaecologists and survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a Scottish national study of 1866 patients". Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 106, 1130.

[5] Olaitan A., Weeks J., Mocroft A., Smith J., Howe K., Murdoch J "The surgical management of women with ovarian cancer in the south west of England". Br. J. Cancer, 2001, 85, 1824.

[6] Elit L., Bondy SJ., Paszat L., Przybysz R., Levine M.: "Outcomes in Surgery for Ovarian Cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 87, 260

[7] Hole DJ., Gillis C.R.: "Use of cancer registry data to evaluate the treatment of ovarian cancer on a hospital basis". Health Reports, 1993, 5, 117.

[8] Elit L., Rosen B., Anderson G., Thiruchelvam D., Levine M "Surgical care gynecologic oncologists would offer women with ovarian cancer". JSOGC, 2001.

[9] Peloso P.M., Stakiw K.J.: "Small-group format for contmumg medical education: a report from the field". J. Contin. Educ Health Prof, 2000, 20, 27.

[10] SGO: "Guidelines for care of gynecologic malignancies" Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, S1.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top