Article Data

  • Views 217
  • Dowloads 109

Original Research

Open Access

Screening for cervical cancer - an evidence-based approach

  • A. Fraser1,*,
  • S. Hellmann1,3
  • L. Leibovici1,3
  • H. Levavi2,3

1Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-7Ykva, Israel

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel

3Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200504372 Vol.26,Issue 4,July 2005 pp.372-375

Published: 10 July 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): A. Fraser E-mail:

Abstract

Introduction: The Papanicolau (Pap) smear is widely accepted by both the public and health authorities as a useful tool for detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. In Israel only opportunistic screening exists and still the incidence of invasive cervical cancer is among the lowest in the world.

Objectives: To examine the existing evidence for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by Pap smears; to apply the findings to Israeli data, and to assess the implications for the current cervical cancer screening policy.

Methods: Search of Medline (1966-June 2003) and the Cochrane Library for relevant systematic reviews, controlled trials and cohort studies.

Results: There have been no trials of screening for cervical cancer and its precursors and therefore, no direct evidence that screening improves outcomes. A single retrospective cohort study estimated the age-adjusted RR for invasive cervical cancer in women with at least one Pap smear, whether normal or abnormal, compared to women with no smear at 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9). In Israel some 27,800 (range: 20,800-167,000) women need to be screened in order to prevent one case of cervical cancer. The cost of preventing a single case of invasive cervical is approximately 1.288 million NIS (range: 1.643-13.193 million NIS).

Conclusions: An evidence-based approach to the question of the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening using Pap smears has yielded weak evidence. Based on this weak evidence and rough estimations of the effectiveness and cost of mass screening for cervical cancer in Israel, we conclude that the current policy should be maintained.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Screening; Pap; Evidence-based medicine; Number needed to screen (NNS)

Cite and Share

A. Fraser,S. Hellmann,L. Leibovici,H. Levavi. Screening for cervical cancer - an evidence-based approach. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2005. 26(4);372-375.

References

[1] Linos A., Riza E.: "Comparisons of cervi omparisons cervical cancer screening programmes in the European Union". Eur. J. Cancer, 2000, 36, 2260.

[2] Women's Health in Israel 1999-2000: a data book, 2000, 79.

[3] Israel National Cancer Registry. http://www.health.gov.il/icr

[4] Menczer J.: "Cervical cancer and cytologic screening in Israel". Harefua, 1981, 101, 124.

[SJ Bornstein J., Abramovitch H.: "The importance of cervical cancer mass screening in Israel". Heblew., 1992, 122, 776.

[6] Ben-Shoshan A., Antebi A.: "Mass screening for early detection of cervical cancer in Israel, the need for renewed debate". Heblew, 2000, 139, 217.

[7] Rychetnik L., Frommer M., Hawe P., Shiell A.: "Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health". J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 2002, 56, 119.

[8] http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/docs/chap2.pdf.

[9] Szklo M., Nieto F.J.: "Epidemiology - Beyond the Basics". Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 2000, 24.

[10] Stenkvist B., Bergstrom R., Eklund G., Fox C.H.: "Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer: what can you expect?". JAMA, 1984, 252, 1423.

[11] http://www.health.gov.il.

[12] La Vecchia C., Decarli A., Gallus G.: "Epidemiological data on cervical carcinoma relevant to cytopathology". Appl. Pathol., 1987, 5, 25.

[13] USPSTF: "Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale". Am. Fam. P hysician., 2003, 67, 1759.

[14] Ball C., Madden J.E.: "Upd ate on cervical cancer screening: current diagnostic and evidence-based management protocols". Postgrad. Med., 2003, 113, 59.

[15] Sadan O., Schejter E., Ginath S., Bachar R., Boaz M., Menczer J., Glezennan M.: "Premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix in a large cohort of Israeli Jewish women". Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Online first. http://www.springerlink.com.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top