Article Data

  • Views 231
  • Dowloads 116

Original Research

Open Access

Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions detected on screening mammography

  • C. Markopoulos1
  • E. Kouskos1,*,
  • K. Revenas1
  • D. Mantas1
  • Z. Antonopoulou1
  • K. Kontzoglou1
  • N. Nikiteas1
  • V. Kyriakou1

1Breast Unit - 2nd Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, and 2nd Surgical Department, "Vostanio" Hospital, Mytilene, Lesuas Island, Greece

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200503311 Vol.26,Issue 3,May 2005 pp.311-314

Published: 10 May 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): E. Kouskos E-mail:

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective clinical study was the analysis of histologic findings of nonpalpable breast lesions managed by open surgical biopsy. A series of 630 women underwent 664 preoperative localizations of nonpalpable, mammographically detected breast lesions during the last 10-year period. Indications for biopsy were (1) clustered microcalcifications, (2) solid mass, and (3) radiologic parenchymal distortion. The lesions were localized preoperatively using hook-wire methods, and all biopsies were performed under general anesthesia. Histopathology revealed carcinoma in 172 (25.9%) cases; noninvasive in 114 (66.3%) cases and infiltrating in 58 (33.7%) cases. The highest malignancy rate was found in cases with microcalcifications (112 carcinomas out of 323 cases, 34.7%). Lymph node invasion was present in 25% of patients with invasive cancers. The hook-wire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is a simple, accurate and safe method for detection of early breast cancers. Frozen section is feasible and accurate in the majority of these lesions, and therefore, diagnostic and therapeutic one-step surgical procedures could be performed.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Nonpalpable; Stereotactic biopsy; Localization; Mammography; In situ carcinoma

Cite and Share

C. Markopoulos,E. Kouskos,K. Revenas,D. Mantas,Z. Antonopoulou,K. Kontzoglou,N. Nikiteas,V. Kyriakou. Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions detected on screening mammography. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2005. 26(3);311-314.

References

[1] Tabar L., Vitak B., Chen H.H., Duffy S.W., Yen M.F., Chiang C.F., et al.: "The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up" Radiol. Clin. North. Am., 2000, 38, 625.

[2] Frank H.A., Hall F.M., Steer M.L.: "Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography". N Engl. J. Med., 1976, 295, 259.

[3] Boerner S., Fornage B.D., Singletary E., Sneige N.: "Ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute -supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA". Cancer, 1999, 25, 19.

[4] Sauer T., Myrvold K., Lomo J., Anderssen K.Y., Skaane P.: "Fineneedle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001". Breast, 2003, 12, 314.

[5] Pijnappel R.M., Peeters P.H., van der Donk M., Hendriks J.H., Deurloo E.E., Mali W.P.: "Diagnostic strategies in non-palpable breast lesions". Eur. J. Cancer, 2002, 38, 550.

[6] Coombs N.J., Laddie J.R., Royle G.T., Rubin C.M., Briley M.S "Improving the sensitivity of stereotactic core biopsy to diagnose ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a mathematical model". Br. J. Radio/., 2001, 74, 123.

[7] Whitten T.M., Wallace T.W., Bird R.E., Turk P.S.: "Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer". Am. Surg., 1997, 63, 1072.

[8] Berner A., Davidson B., Sigstad E., Risberg B.: "Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions". Diagn. Cytopathol., 2003, 29, 344.

[9] Shah V.I., Raju U., Chitale D., Deshpande V., Gregory N., Strand V.: "False-negative core biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer". Cancer, 2003, 97, 1824.

[10] Apesteguia L., Mellado M., Saenz J., Cordero L., Reparaz B., De Miguel C.: "Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotactic table of nonpalpable lesions non-recognisable by ultrasonography". Eur. Radiol., 2002, 12, 638.

[11] Sheth D., Wesen C.A., Schroder D., Boccaccio J.E., Lloyd LR .. "The advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI) experience at a community hospital". Am. Surg., 1999, 65, 726.

[12] Verkooijen H.M., Peeters P.H., Buskens E., Koot V.C., Borel Rinkes I.H., Mali W.P. et al.: "Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis". Br. J. Cancer, 2000, 82, 1017.

[13] Buijs-van der Woude T., Verkooijen H.M., Pijnappel R.M., Klinkenbijl J.H., Borel Rinkes I.H., Peeters P.H. et al.: "The COBRA study group (COre Biopsy RAdiological localization) Cost comparison between stereotactic large-core-needle biopsy versus surgical excision biopsy in The Netherlands". Eur. J Cancer, 2001, 37, 1736.

[14] Bigelow R., Smith R., Goodman P.A., Wilson G.S.: "Needle localization of non palpable breast masses". Arch. Surg., 1985, 120, 565.

[15] Symmonds R.E., Roberts J.W.: "Management of nonpalpable breast abnormalities". Ann. Surg., 1987, 205, 520.

[16] Vuorela A.L., Kettunen S., Punto L.: "Preoperative hook-wire localization of nonpalpable breast lesions by use of standard and stereotactic technique". Anticancer Res., 1993, 13, 1873.

[17] Papatestas A.E., Hermann D., Hermann G., Tsevdos C., Lesnick G.: "Surgery for nonpalpable breast lesions". Arch. Surg., 1990, 125, 399.

[18] Schwartz G.F., Carter D.L., Conart E.F., Gannon F.H., Finkel G.C., Feig S.A.: "Mammographically detected breast cancer: nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential". Cancer, 1994, 73, 1660.

[19] Papa M.Z., Klein E., Davidson B., Karni T., Sperber F., Koller M 'The effect of anesthesia type on needle localization breast biopsy another point of view". Am. J. Surg., 1996, 171, 242.

[20] Franceschi D., Crowe J.P., Lie S., Duchesneau R., Zollinger R., Shenk R. et al.: "Not all nonpalpable breast cancers are alike". Arch. Surg., 1991, 126, 967.

[21] Niemann T.H., Lucas J.G., Marsh W.L. Jr.: "To freeze or not to freeze. A comparison of methods for the handling of breast biopsies with no palpable abnormality". Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1996, 106, 225.

[22] Bianchi S., Palli D., Ciatto S., Galli M., Giorgi D., Vezzosi V. et al "Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis in a series of 672 nonpalpable breast lesions". J Clin. Pathol., 1995, 103, 199.

[23] Jackman R.J., Marzoni F.A. Jr.: "Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail?". Radiology, 1998, 207, 677.

[24] Wilhelm M.C., Edge S.B., Cole D.D., De Paredes E., Frierson H.F.: "Nonpalpable invasive breast cancer". Ann. Surg., 1991, 213, 600.

[25] Lein B.C., Alex W.R., Zebley D.M., Pezzi C.M.: "Results of needle localized breast biopsy in women under age 50". Am. J. Surg., 1996, 171, 356.

[26] Mokbel K., Ahmed M., Nash A., Sacks N.: "Re-excision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer". J. Surg. Oneal., 1995, 58, 225.

[27] Markopoulos C., Kakisis J., Kouskos E., Kontzoglou K., Koufopoulos K., Gogas J.: "Management of nonpalpable, mammographically detectable breast lesions". World J. Surg., 1999, 23, 434.

[28] Lantsberg L., Kirshtein B., Koretz M., Strano S.: "Role of wireguided breast biopsy for diagnosis of malignant nonpalpable mammographic lesions". World J. Surg., 1999, 23, 1279.

[29] Pettine S., Place R., Babu S., Williard W., Kim D., Carter P "Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive and cost effective". Am. J. Surg., 1996, 171, 474.

[30] Silverstein M.J., Gamagami P., Colburn W.J., Gierson E.D., Rosser R.J., Handel N. et al.: Nonpalpable breast lesions: diagnosis with slightly overpenetrated screen-film mammography and hook wiredirected biopsy in 1,014 cases". Radiology, 1989, 171, 633.

[31] Kouskos E., Markopoulos C., Revenas K., Koufopoulos K., Kynakou V, Gogas J. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms". Acta Radio!., 2003, 44, 43.

[32] Iino Y., Sugamata N., Aoyagi H., Takeo T., Takei H., Horiguch J et al.: "Nonpalpable breast cancer". Anticancer Res., 1994, 14, 2193.

[33] Sailors D.M., Crabtree J.D., Land R.L., Rose W.B., Burns R.P., Barker D.E.: "Needle localization for nonpalpable breast lesions" Am. Surg., 1994, 60, 186.

[34] Markopoulos C., Kouskos E., Gogas H., Mandas D., Kakisis J., Gogas J.: "Factors affecting axillary lymph node metastases in patients with Tl breast carcinoma". Am. Surg., 2000, 66, 1011.

[35] Dowlatshahi K., Snider H.C. Jr., Kim R.: "Axillary node status in nonpalpable breast cancer". Ann. Surg. Oncol., 1995, 2, 424.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top