Article Data

  • Views 201
  • Dowloads 129

Original Research

Open Access

A retrospective study of 32 borderline ovarian tumours: The experience of a non-specialized centre

  • A. Economou1
  • P. Panagopoulos1,*,
  • I. Koutras1
  • G. Petrakos1
  • S. Karadaglis1
  • C. Karcanis1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Tzaneio" Hospital, Piraeus, Greece

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200502196 Vol.26,Issue 2,March 2005 pp.196-198

Published: 10 March 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): P. Panagopoulos E-mail:

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the clinical features and treatment of patients with borderline ovarian tumors.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of the charts of 32 patients with borderline ovarian tumours that underwent surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, over a 14-year period (1/1990-12/2003).

Results: Of the patients 62.5% were pre- or peri-menopausal. Mean age was 41.6 years. Five patients (15.63%) had undergone pelvic surgery (caesarean section not included) for unrelated reasons prior to the diagnosis of borderline tumour. Mean follow-up was 71.37 months and all patients showed up for their scheduled appointment during the first trimester of 2004. Pain was the presenting symptom in 37.5% (12/32) of patients. Twenty patients were diagnosed either by ultrasound (12.5%, 4/32) or during unrelated surgeries (50%, 16/32) and reported no relevant symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Treatment was conservative, comprised of either cystectomy (3/32), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (13/32), and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with myomectomy (1/32). Abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 15 patients for unrelated conditions (uterine pathology). Mucinous borderline tumours were identified in 11 patients (34.38%), serous borderline tumours in 17 patients (53.12%), and nonserous-mucinous borderline tumours in four patients (12.5%). Omentectomy was performed in two cases, biopsy of the controlateral ovary was performed in five cases and peritoneal washing in eight cases. Restaging surgery was performed at the Metaxa Anticancer Piraeus Hospital in 11 patients (34.38%). One patient who did not undergo a restaging operation had a recurrence of the disease.

Conclusion: Suboptimal staging remains a major problem during the initial operation in non-specialized centres in gynaecologic malignancies.

Keywords

Borderline ovarian cancer; Staging; Treatment; Biopsy

Cite and Share

A. Economou,P. Panagopoulos,I. Koutras,G. Petrakos,S. Karadaglis,C. Karcanis. A retrospective study of 32 borderline ovarian tumours: The experience of a non-specialized centre. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2005. 26(2);196-198.

References

[1] Taylor H.C.: "Malignant and semi-malignant tumours of the ovary". Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1929, 48, 204.

[2] Trope'C.G., Kristensen G., Makar A.: "Surgery for borderlme tumour of the ovary". Sem. Surg. Oneal., 2000, 19, 69.

[3] Classification and staging of malignant tumours in the female pelvis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1971, 50, 1.

[4] Kottmeier H.L., Kolstad P., McGarrity K.A. et al.: "Annual report on results of treatment in gynaecologic cancer. v. 17". Stockholm: Radiumhemmet Editorial Office, 1973.

[5] Seidman J.D., Russell P., Kurman R.J.: "Surface epithelial tumours of the ovary". In: Kurman R.J. (ed.). Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2002, 791.

[6] Gwinn M.L., Lee N.C., Rhodes P.H., Rubin G.L.: "Pregnancy, breast-feeding and oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer". J. Clin. Epidemiol., 1990, 43, 559.

[7] Riman T., Dickman P.W., Nilsson S., Correia N., Nordlinder H., Magnusson C.M. et al.: "Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumours: results of a Swedish case-control study" Gynaecol. Oncol., 2001, 83, 575.

[8] Tamakoshi K., Kikkawa F., Nakashima N., Tamakoshi A., Kawai M., Furuhashi Y. et al.: "Clinical behaviour of borderline ovarian tumours: a study of 150 cases". J. Surg. Oncol., 1997, 64, 147.

[9] Kærn J., Trope C.G., Kristensen G.B., Adeler V.M., Pettersen E.O.: "DNA ploidy; the most important prognostic factor in patients with borderline tumours of the ovary". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1993, 3, 349.

[10] BjØrge T., Engeland A., Hansen S., Trope C.G.: "Trends in the incidence of ovarian cancer and borderline tumours in Norway, 1954-1993. Int. J. Cancer, 1997, 71, 780.

[11] Bell D.A.: "Ovarian surface epithelial-stromal tumours". Hum. Pathol., 1991, 22, 750.

[12] Gotlieb W.H., Flikker S., Davidson B., Korach Y., Kopolovic J., Ben-Baruch G.: "Borderline tumours of the ovary fertility treatment, conservative management, and pregnancy outcome" Cancer, 1998, 82, 141.

[13] Maneo A., Vignali M., Chiari S., Colombo A., Mangioni C., Landoni F.: "Are borderline tumours of the ovary safely treated by laparoscopy?". Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 387.

[14] Morice P., Camatte S., Larregain-Fournier D., Thoury A., Duvillard P., Castaigne D.: "Port-site implantation after laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumours". Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 104 (5 Pt 2), 1167.

[15] Kliman L., Rome R.M., Fortune D.W.: "Low malignant potential tumours of the ovary: A study of 76 cases". Obstet. Gynecol., 1986, 68, 338.

[16] Fauvet R., Boccara J., Dufournet C., David-Montefiore E., Poncelet C., Darai E.: "Restaging surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumours: results of a French multicenter study". Cancer, 2004, 15, 100 (6), 1145.

[17] Camatte S., Morice P., Thoury A., Fourchotte V., Pautier P., Lhomme C. et al.: «Impact of surgical staging in patients with macroscopic "stage I" ovarian borderline tumours: analysis of a continuous series of 10 I cases». Eur. J. Cancer, 2004, 40, 1842.

[18] Lin P.S., Gershenson D.M., Bevers M.W., Lucas K.R., Burke T.W., Silva E.G.: "The current status of surgical staging of ovarian serous borderline tumors". Cancer, 1999, 4, 905.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top