Article Data

  • Views 281
  • Dowloads 120

Original Research

Open Access

Normal colposcopy following abnormal Pap smear evoking LGSIL: A follow-up study

  • G. Kourounis1,*,
  • P. Ravazoula2
  • G. Michail1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Patras

2Department of Pathology-Cytology, University Hospital of Patras, Greece

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200405623 Vol.25,Issue 5,September 2004 pp.623-624

Published: 10 September 2004

*Corresponding Author(s): G. Kourounis E-mail:

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment policy in women presenting with an abnormal Pap smear showing low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL), who additionally had normal colposcopic findings. We prospectively studied 160 women with LGSIL and normal colposcopy, and divided them into two groups. Group A, consisting of 54 women, was followed-up for a mean period of 42 months and had a new control smear 12 months after the initial one. Group B, consisting of 106 women, was followed-up for a mean period of 44 months and had two consecutive control smears (6 and 12 months after the initial), and a new colposcopy, depending on the findings. At the end of the first year, the lesion persisted in 37% and 39% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively. At the end of the study, regression or persistence of the LGSIL was revealed in 63% and 61% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. Aggravation of the lesions occurred after 16.5 and 15 months, respectively, in groups A and B. Our findings suggest that women with LGSIL and normal colposcopy do not need further therapeutic measures during the first year after the initial smear.

Keywords

LGSIL; Colposcopy; Follow-up

Cite and Share

G. Kourounis,P. Ravazoula,G. Michail. Normal colposcopy following abnormal Pap smear evoking LGSIL: A follow-up study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2004. 25(5);623-624.

References

[1] Baldauf J.. Ritter J.: "Comparison of the risks of cytologic surveillance of women with atypical cells or low-grade abnormalitics on cervical smear: review of the literature". Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1998, 76, 193.

[2] Anderson M.B., Jones B.A.: ”False positive cervicovaginal cytology. A follow-up study". Acta Cytol., 1997, 41, 1697.

[3] Hellberg D., Nilsson S., Valentin J.: "Positive cervical smear with subsequent normal colposcopy and histology- frequency of CIN in a long-term follow-up". Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 53, 148.

[4] Milne D.S., Wadehra V., Mennim D., WagstaffT.l.: "A prospecltve follow-up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1999, 106, 38.

[5] Roland P.Y., Naumann R.W., Alvarez R.D., Kiglore L.C., Partridge E.E.: "A decision analysis of practice patterns used in evaluating and treating abnormal Pap 、mears". Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 59 (1), 75.

[6] Lonky N.M., Sadeghi M., Tsadik G.W.: "Poor correlation of high grade cervical dysplasia with referred cytology: Clinical implications". Prim. Care Update ofGyns., 1998, 5 (4), 161.

[7] Mannino J.R.: "Natural History of false negative Pap smears: A prospective study using screening Colposcopy in addition to Cytology". J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc., 1998, 98 (10), 542.

[8] Mcanec M., Stewart D.E., Lickrish G.M., Murphy J., Rosen B.: "Patient preference for the managemcnt of mildly abnormal Pap smears". J. Womens Health Gend Based Med., 1999, 8 (7), 941.

[9] Mayeaux E.T. Jr., Harper M.B., Abreo F., Pope J.B., Phillips G.S.: "A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and Colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical Cytology". J. Fa111. Pract., 1995, 40 (1), 57.

[10] Mitchell M.F., Schottenfeld D., Tortolero-Luna G., Cantor S.B., Richards-Kortum R.: "Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: A mcta-analysis“ Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 91, 626.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top