Article Data

  • Views 393
  • Dowloads 123

Original Research

Open Access

Is direct large loop electric excision for the transformation zone reasonable in the investigation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smears?

  • K.Y. Ng1
  • C.K. Chang1
  • J. Chen2
  • P.H. Wang2
  • S.W. Teng1,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardinal Tien Hospital and Fu Jen Catholic University School of Medicine, Taiwan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20040161 Vol.25,Issue 1,January 2004 pp.61-65

Published: 10 January 2004

*Corresponding Author(s): S.W. Teng E-mail:

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To evaluate women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL) who received standard colposcopic evaluation and direct diagnostic large loop electric excision for the transformation zone (LLETZ) to determine the feasibility of using LLETZ alone (ie, skipping the colposcopic examination).

Methods: From May 1999 to May 2001, 70 women, with the mean age of 49.58 years (range, 20-82 years) and with cervical HGSIL categorized by the Bethesda system were all evaluated by colposcopic evaluation and LLETZ. Cases with a satisfactory colposcopy examination were classified as group A and those with an unsatisfactory colposcopy examination were classified as group B. "Over-treatment" was determined if the women did not need further LLETZ for evaluation or management. "Under-treatment" was determined if treatment might be potentially inadequate or invasive cancer could be ruled out during a satisfactory colposcopic evaluation.

Results: Group A consisted of ten women who were evaluated satisfactorily by colposcopy and group B consisted of 30 women who were not evaluated satisfactorily by colposcopy. Overall 8.6% of the patients (6/70) were considered "over-treated". The rate of over-treatment was 10.0% (4/40) in group A compared with 6.7% (2/30) in group B. In contrast, overall 10% of the patients (7/70) were considered "under-treated". The rate of under-treatment was 10% (1/40) in group A compared with 10% (3/30), in group B. The positive predictive values of group A and B were 90.6% and 88.0%, respectively. The negative predictive values were 33.2% and 40%, respectively.

Conclusion: Direct diagnostic and therapeutic LLETZ for the management of cervical HGSIL may be a better alternative to colposcopy. This method of treatment avoids the possibility of under-treatment and is associated with an acceptable over-treatment rate, especially for postmenopausal women with cytological HGSIL. LLETZ has a good diagnostic accuracy with minimal morbidity and, most importantly, may help reduce patient anxicty, although further studies are needed to directly examine this effect.

Keywords

HGSIL; Direct diagnostic and therapeutic LLETZ

Cite and Share

K.Y. Ng,C.K. Chang,J. Chen,P.H. Wang,S.W. Teng. Is direct large loop electric excision for the transformation zone reasonable in the investigation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smears?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2004. 25(1);61-65.

References

[I] Kuman R. J., Henson D. E., Herbst A. L., Noller K. L., Schiffman M. H.: "Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology". JAMA, 1994, 271, 1866.

[2] Wright T. C., Cox J. T., Massad L. S., Twiggs L.B., Wilkinson E J.: "2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities". JAMA, 2002, 287, 2120.

[3] Heung-Tat Ng.: "Cervical Cancer". l" ed., Taipei, Maw Chang Book Co., 2002, 97 (in Chinese)

[4] Fanning J., Padratzik J.: "Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?"_ J. Reprod. Med., 2002, 47, 33.

[5] Massad L. S., Collins Y. C., Meyer P. M.: "Biopsy correlates of abnormal cervical cytology classified using the Bethesda system" Gynecol. Oneal., 2001, 82, 516.

[6] Chappatte O. A., Byrne D. L., Raju K. S., Nayagam M., Kenney A.: "Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ)". Gynecol. Oneal., 1991, 43, 46.

[7] Thomas C. J.: "Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia" Ldncet, 1999, 353, 857.

[8] Crispens M.A., Naumann R. W.,A lvarez R. D.: "Treatment of cervical dysplasia with large loop excision of the transformation zone: is endocervical curettage necessary?". South Med. J., 1996, 89, 961.

[9] Clifford R., Wheeless J. (eds.): "Atlas of Pelvic Surgery". 3rd ed., Philadelphia, PA, Williams & Wilkins, 1997, 186.

[10] Brown F. M., Faquin W. C., Sun D., Crum C. P., Cibas E. S "LSIL biopsies after HSIL smears. Correlation with high-risk HPV and greater risk of HSIL on follow-up". Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1999, 112, 765.

[11] Kinney W. K., Manos M. M., Hurley L. B., Ransley J. E "Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia?". Ohstet. Gynecol., 1998, 91, 973.

[12] Yuan C. C., Wang P.H., Ng H. T., Tsai L. C., Juang C. M., Chiu L. M.: "Both TPA and SCC-Ag levels are prognostic even in high risk stage IB-IIa cervical carcinoma determined by a stratification analysis". Eur. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 23, 17.

[13] Chao H. T., Wang P.H., Tseng J. Y., Lai C. R., Chiang S. C., Yuan C. C.: "Lymphocyte infiltrated on FIGO stage IIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix is a prominent factor for disease-free survival". Eur. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 20, 136.

[14] Yuan C. C., Wang P.H., Ng H. T., Li Y. F., Huang T. S., Chen C. Y. et al.: "Detecting cytokeratin 19 mRNA in the peripheral blood cells of cervical cancer patients and its clinical-pathological correlation". Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 85, 148.

[15] Wang P. H., Li Y. F., Juang C. M., Lee Y. R., Chao H. T., Ng H. T et al.: "Expression of sialyltransferase family members in cervix squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis". Gynecol. Onco/., 2002, 86, 45.

[16] Martin-Hirsch P. L., Paraskevaidis E., Kitchener H.: "Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia". Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2002, (2), CD0013180.

[17] Bornstein J., Yaakov Z., Pascal B., Faktor J., Bararn A., Zarfati D et al.: "Decision-making in the colposcopy clinic - a critical analysis". Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1999, 85, 219.

[18] Hopman E. H., Lenemans P., Helmerhorst T. J.M.: "Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: "An overview of literature". Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 1998, 53, 97.

[19] Buxton E. J., Luesley D. M., Shafi M. I. et al.: "Colposcopically directed biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1991, 98, 1273.

[20] Choo Y. C., Chan 0. L. Y., Hsu C. et al.: "Colposcopy in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix: an enigma of diagnosis". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1994, 91, 1156.

[21] Bigrigg A., Haffenden D. L., Sheehan A. L., Codling B. W., Read M. D.: "Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone". Lancet, 1994, 343, 32.

[22] Denny L.A., Soeters R., Dehaeck K., Bloch B.: "Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1995, 102, 545.

[23] Holschneider C.H., F elix J. C., Satmery W., Johnson M. Y., Sandeiss L. M., Montz F. J.: "A single visit cervical carcinoma prevention program offered at an inner city church: a pilot project". Cancer, 1999, 86, 2659.

[24] Santos C., Galdo R., Alvarez J. et al.: "One-session management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia". Gynecol. Oneal., 1996, 61, 11.

[25] Luesley D. M., Cullimore J., Redman C. W. E et al.: "Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears". Br. Med. ]., 1990, 300, 1690.

[26] Prendiville W., Cullimore J., Norman S.: "Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1989, 86, 1054.

[27] Townsend D. E., Richart R. M.: "Diagnostic errors in colposcopy". Gynecol. Oneal., 1981, 12, S259.

[28] Naik R., Abang-Mohammed K., Tjalma W. A., Nordin A., de Barros LopesA ., Cross P.A. et al.: "The feasibility of a one-stop colposcopy clinic in the management of women with low grade smear abnormalities: a prospective study". Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2001, 98, 205.

[29] Darwish A., Gadallah H.: "One-step management of cervical lesions". Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1998, 61, 261.

[30] Bigrigg M.A., Codling B. W., Pearson P., Read M. D., Swingler G. R.: "Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit". Lancet, 1990, 336, 229.

[31] Hammond R.H., Edmonds D. K.: "Does treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia affect fertility and pregnancy? Little to worry about". Br. Med. J., 1990, 301, 344.

[32] Montz F. J.: "Impact of therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on fertility". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 175, 1129.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top