Article Data

  • Views 325
  • Dowloads 102

Original Research

Open Access

Improved early detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions by combination of conventional Pap smear and speculoscopy

  • B. K-J Yu1,4,5,*,
  • B. 1-T Kuo3
  • M-S Yen1,3
  • N-F Twu1,3
  • C-R Lai2,3
  • P-J Chen7
  • P-S Chien6
  • K-C Chao1,4,5
  • C-C Yuan1,4,5

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ROC

2Department of Pathology, ROC

3Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, ROC

4National Yang-Ming University, ROC

5National Defense Medical College, ROC

6Armed Forces Keelung Hospital, ROC

7The Hospital of National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200306495 Vol.24,Issue 6,November 2003 pp.495-499

Published: 10 November 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): B. K-J Yu E-mail:

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the addition of speculoscopy to a Pap smear in cervical cancer screening.

Methods: All women were screened using the Pap smear plus speculoscopy (PapSure) and colposcopy in the multicenter trial. The final diagnosis of each patient was based on a histological evaluation of the colposcopic target biopsy. Results were analyzed using a proportional compare test, sensitivity, specificity and predictive value with significant value determined at less than 0.05.

Results: Of 1,717 eligible cases, 26 cases had LGSIL and 16 cases had HGSIL. Of the Pap smears, five cases had LSIL and 14 cases had HGSIL. Of the combination of the PapSure, 23 cases had LGSIL and 16 cases had HGSIL. The sensitivity of the Pap smear to that of PapSure was calculated at 45.2% and 92.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The estimated cost to detect a cervical lesion using PapSure is less than that of the Pap smear.

Conclusion: The addition of speculoscopy along with a Pap smear screening results in early detection of cervical lesions in comparison to the Pap smear alone. This screening combination is also more cost-effective and requires fewer visits to the clinic in comparison to a Pap smear screening alone.

Keywords

Cervical cancer screening; Papanicolaou smear; Speculoscopy

Cite and Share

B. K-J Yu,B. 1-T Kuo,M-S Yen,N-F Twu,C-R Lai,P-J Chen,P-S Chien,K-C Chao,C-C Yuan. Improved early detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions by combination of conventional Pap smear and speculoscopy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2003. 24(6);495-499.

References

[1] Morrell N.D., Taylor J.R., Snyder R.N., Zeil H.K., Saltz A., Willie S.: "False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed". Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 60, 41.

[2] Koss L.G., Sherman M.E., Cohen M.B., Anes A.R., Darragh T.M., Lemos L.B. et al.: "Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PapNet Testing System)". Hum. Path., 1997, 28, 1196.

[3] Fahey M.T., Irwig L., Macaskill P.: "Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy". Am. J. Epidemiol., 1995, 141, 680.

[4] Lonky N.M., Mann W.J., Massad L.S., Mutch D.G., Blanco J.S., Vasilev S.A. et al.: "Ability of visual tests to predict underlying cervical neoplasia: coloscopy and speculoscopy". J. Reprod. Med.,1995, 40, 530.

[5] Cuzick J., Szarewskii A., Terry G., Ho L., Hanby A., Maddox P.: "Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening". Lancet, 1995, 345, 1533.

[6] Loiudice L., Abbiati R., Boselli F., Gecchini G., Costa S., Grossi E. et al.: "Improvement of Pap smear sensitivity using a visual adjunctive procedure: a co-operative Italian study on speculoscopy (GISPE)". Eur. J. Ca. Prev., 1998, 7, 1.

[7] "Season report of Pap smear screening in Taiwan". National Department of Health Taiwan, 1997, 3, 2.

[8] Denny L., Kuhn L., Pollack A., Wainwright H., Wright T.C.: "Evaluation of alternative methods of cervical cancer screening for resource-poor settings". Cancer, 2000, 89, 826.

[9] Benedet J.L., Anderson G.H., Matisic J.P.: "A comprehensive program for cervical cancer detection and management". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 166, 1254.

[10] Edwards G., Rutkowski C., Palmer C.: "Cervical cancer screening with Papnicolaou smear plus speculoscopy by nurse practitioners in a health maintenance organization". J. Lower. Gen. Tract. Dis., 1997, 1, 141.

[11] Lonky N.M., Sadeghi M., Tsadik G.W., Petitti D.: "The clinical significance of the poor correlation of cervical dysplasia and cervical malignancy with referral cytologic results". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 181, 560.

[12] Felix J.C., Lonky N.M., Tamura K., Yu K.J., Naidu Y., Lai C.R., et al.: "Aberrant expression of E-cadherin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia correlates with a false negative papanicolaou smear". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 186, 1308.

[13] Christoforoni P., Favre A., Cennamo V., Giunta M., Corte G., Grossi C.E.: "Expression of a novel betal integrin in the dysplastic progression of the cervical epithelium". Gynecol. Oneal., 1995, 58, 319.

[14] DeBoer C.J., van Dorst E., van Krieken H., Jansen-van Rhijn C., Wamaar S., Fleuren G.: "Changing roles of cadherins and catenins during progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions in the uterine cervix". Am. J. Pathol., 1999, 155, 505.

[15] Saw H.S., Lee J.K., Lee H.L., Jee H.J., Hyun J.J.: "Natural history of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion". J. Lower. Gen. Tract. Dis., 2001, 5, 153.

[16] Kiviat N.K.: "Natural history of cervical neoplasia: overview and update". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 175, 1099.

[17] Melnikow J., Nuovo J., Willan A.R., Chan B.K.S., Howell L.P.: "Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis". Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 92, 727.

[18] Ostor A.G.: "Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review". Int. J. Gynecol. Path., 1993, 12, 186.

[19] Barrow B.A., Richart R.M.: "A statistical model of the natural history of cervical carcinoma. II. Estimates of the transition time from dysplasia to carcinoma in situ". J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 1970, 45, 1025.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top