Article Data

  • Views 325
  • Dowloads 148

Meta-Analyses

Open Access

Development of an evidence-based algorithm for the management of cervical cancer

  • M. C. Shaw1
  • C. D. A. Wolfe1,*,
  • O. Devaja2
  • K. S. Raju2

1Department of Public Health Medicine, The Guy's, King's College and St Thomas'Hospitals Schools of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, UK

2Department of Gynaecological Oncology Guy's and St Thomas'Hospital, London, UK

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200305365 Vol.24,Issue 5,September 2003 pp.365-372

Published: 10 September 2003

*Corresponding Author(s): C. D. A. Wolfe E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: To develop a description of the management of cervical cancer to support locally developed, regional guidelines and to identify the level of primary research evidence to support it.

Design: Development of a flow-charted algorithm, using regional guidelines and clinician consensus. A Medline literature search for primary research was done to validate the algorithm and selection of papers, to verify if they were valid according to pre-defined criteria and to compare algorithm management with an alternative.

Main outcome measure: The highest level of evidence for algorithm management was based on the design of the supporting research.

Results: Twenty percent of the algorithm is supported by level I evidence (randomised controlled trials), 70% by level II evidence (cohort studies) and 10% by level IV evidence (expert opinion or case series). Level II evidence supports the management of Stage Ia, squamous cell carcinoma by cone biopsy or a simple hysterectomy. This level of evidence also applies to research on the management of Stages Ib-IIa, by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by radiotherapy, if the lymph nodes are positive. Radiotherapy to treat Stages IIb-IV cervical cancer is supported by level I evidence. The management of Stage I adenocarcinoma is supported by level II evidence.

Conclusions: Evaluations of the effect of informing clinicians of the strengths of the proposed management are now required, as constructing evidence-based algorithms is worthwhile, only if they are likely to affect clinical practice.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Clinical algorithm; Evidence-based medicine

Cite and Share

M. C. Shaw,C. D. A. Wolfe,O. Devaja,K. S. Raju. Development of an evidence-based algorithm for the management of cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2003. 24(5);365-372.

References

[I] Gatta G., Sant M.: "Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: The EUROCARE Study". Lyon: !ARC Scientific Publications; 1995; 2, Guide to tables, 278.

[2] Thames Cancer Registry. Matthews G. (ed.) Cancer in South East England 1996. London: Thames Cancer Registry, 1997, 1, Gynaecol. Cancer: Cervix, 7.

[3] Lamont D. W., Symonds R. P., Brodie M. M., Nwabineli N. J., Gilis C.R.: "Age, socio-economic status and survival from cancer of the cervix in the west of Scotland 1980-1987". Br. J. Cancer, 1993, 67, 351.

[4] Bissett D., Lamont D. W., Nwabineli N. J., Brodie M. M., Symonds R. P.: "The treatment of stage I carcinoma of the cervix in the west of Scotland 1980-1987". Br. J. Ohstet. Gynaecol., 1994, 101 (7), 615.

[5] Jackson S., Murdoch J., Howe K., Bedford C., Sanders T., Prentice A.: "The management of cervical cancer in the South West Region of England". Br. J. Ohstet. Gynaecol., 1997, 104, 140.

[6] Covens A., Rosen B., Gibbons A., Osborne R., Murphy J., DePetrillo A. et al.: "Differences in the morb心ty of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists". Gyneco/. Oneal., 1993, 51, 39.

[7] Wolfe C. D., Tilling K,, Bourne H. M., Raju K. S.: "Variations in the screening history and appropriateness of management of cervical carcinoma in South East England". Eur. J. Cancer, 1996, 32A (7), 1198.

[8] Sudlow M., Thomson R.: "Clinical guidelines: quantity without quality". Quality in Health Care, 1997, 6, 60.

[9] Sackett D. L.,R ichardson W. S.,R osenberg W. et al.: Churchill L.,(ed.) "Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM". I" London: Church仆1-Livingstone,1997.

[10] Melville A., Eastwood A., Kleijnen J.: NHS CRD (ed.). "Guidance on Commissioning Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Gynaecological Cancers. The Researh Evidence". London: NHS Executive, 1999.

[11] Sikora K.: "Cancer survival in Britain. is poorer than that of her comparable European neighbours". B. M. J., 1999, 319, 462.

[12] Guterman J. J., Mankovich N. J., Weinstein S., Picken B.: "Structured knowledge representation: an improved methodology for communication of hospital policy". Proceedings - the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1995, 733.

[13] Franklin R. C., Spiegelhalter D. J., Macartney F. J., Bull K.: "Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for heart disease in neonates". B. M. J., 1991, 302, 935.

[14] Aitchison T. C., Sirel J. M., Watt D. C., MacKie R. M.: "Prognostic trees to aid prognosis in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma". B. M. J., 1995, 311, 1536.

[15] Darbar D., G仆lespie N., Choy A. M., Lang C. C., Pringle S. D., Pringle T. H. et al.: "Diagnosing Jet,tventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: the Dundee algorithm". QJM, 1997, 90(11), 677.

[16] Marsden A. K., Ng A. G., Dalziel K., Cobbe S. M.: "When is it futile for ambulance personnel to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation?". B. M. J., 1995, 311, 49.

[17] Foster G. R., Goldin R. D., Main J., Murray-Lyon I., Hargreaves S., Thomas H. C.: "Management of chronic hepatitis C: clinical audit of biopsy based management algorithm". B. M. J., 1997, 315. 453.

[18] McKibbon K. A., Walker-Dilks C. J.: "Beyond ACP Journal Club: How to harness MEDLINE for therapy problems". ACP Journal Club 1994, 121 (Suppl. I), A 10.

[19] McKibbon K. A., Walker-Dilks C. J., Haynes R. B., Wilczynski N., Beyond A. C. P.: "Journal Club: How to harness MEDLINE for prognosis problems". ACP Journal Club, 1995, 123 (Suppl 1), A1 2.

[20] NHS CRD: National Health Service Centre for Reviews & D1ssemination(ed.). "Undertaking Systematic reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews". York: York Publishing Services, 1996.

[21] Piura B., Dgani R., Yanai-lnbar I., Cohen Y., Glezerman M.: "Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a study of 37 cases". J. Surg. Oneal., 1996, 61 (4), 249.

[22] Chen R. J., Chang D. Y., Yen M. L., Lee E. F., Huang S. C., Chow S. N., Hsieh C. Y.: "Prognostic factors of primary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix". Gynecol. Oneal., 1998, 69 (2), 157.

[23] McManus R. J、Wilson S., Delaney B. C., Fitzmaurice D. A., Hyde C. J., Tobias R. S. et al.: "Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews". B. M. 1., 1999. 317, 1562.

[24] International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics: Pettersson F., Creasman W. T., Shepherd J. et al. (eds.). Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynaecological Cancer. Stockholm: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1994.

[25] Landoni F., Maneo A., Colombo A., Placa F., Milani R., Perego P et al.: "Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage lb-Ila cervical cancer". Lancet, 1997, 350 (9077), 535.

[26] Keys H. M., Bundy B. N., Stehman F. B., Muderspach L. I., Chafe W. E., Suggs C. L. et al.: "Cisplatin, radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage lb cervical carcinoma". N. Engl. 1. Med., 1999, 340 (15), 1154.

[27] Morris M., Eifel P. J., Lu J., Grigsby P. W., Levenback C., Stevens R. E. et al.: "Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high risk cervical cancer". N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340 (15), 1137.

[28] Rose P. G., Bundy B. N., Watkins E. B., Thigpen J. T., Deppe G., Maiman M. et al.: "Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer". N. Engl. J Med., 1999, 340 (15), 1144.

[29] Kolstad P.: "Follow-up study of 232 patients with stage Ja l and 411 patients with stage la2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (microinvasive carcinoma)". Gynecol. Oneal., 1989, 33 (3), 265.

[30] Kinney W. K., Alvarez R. D., Reid G. C., Schray M. F., Soong S J., Morley G. W. et al.: "Value of adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation after Wertheim hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic nodal metastasis: a matched-control study". Gynecol. Oneal., 1989, 34 (3), 258.

[31] Lai C. H., Hong J. H., Hsueh S., Ng K. K., Chang T. C., Tseng C J. et al.: "Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of Stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastases: an analysis of 891 cases". Cancer, 1999, 85 (7), 1537.

[32] Ayhan A., Tuncer Z. S.: "Effect of paraaortic lymphadenectomy on 5-year survival in early stage cervical cancer". Australian & N. Zealand J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1990, 30 (4), 378.

[33] Kikkawa F., Kawai M., Oguchi H., Kojima M., Ishikawa H., Iwata M. et al.: "Randomised study of immunotherapy with OK-432 in uterine cervical carcinoma". Eur. 1. Cancer, 1993, 29A (11), 1542.

[34] Curtin J. P,, Hoskins W. J., Yenkatraman E. S., Almadrones L., Podratz K. C., Long et al.: "Adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus pelvic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH-PLND): a randomized phase III trial". Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 61 (I), 3

[35] Tattersall M. H., Ramirez C., Coppleson M.: "A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy in stage lbIla cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases" Gynecol. Oneal., 1992, 46 (2), 176

[36] Kigawa J., Minagawa Y., Ishihara H., Itamochi H., Kanamori Y., Terakawa N.: "The role of neoadjuvant intraarterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin and bleomycin for locally advanced cervical cancer". Am. J. Clin. Oneal., 1996, 19 (3), 255.

[37] Chiara S., Bruzzone M., Merlini L., Bruzzi P., Rosso R., Franzone P. et al.: "Randomized study comparing chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in FIGO stage IIB-lll cervical carcinoma. GONO (North-West Oncologic Cooperative Group)". Am. J. Clin. Oneal., 1994, 17 (4), 294.

[38] Souhami L., Gil R. A., Allan S. E., Canary P. C., Araujo C.M., Pinto L. H., Silveira T. R.: "A randomized trial of chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix". J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 9 (6), 970.

[39] Tattersall M. H., Lorvidhaya Y., Vootiprux Y., Cheirsilpa A., Wong F., Azhar et al.: "Randomized trial of epirubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cervical Cancer Study Group of the Asian Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association". J. Clin. Oneal., 1995, 13 (2), 444.

[40] Sundfor K., Trope C. G., Hogberg T., Onsrud M., Koern J., Simonsen E., Bertelsen K., Westberg R.: "Radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma. A randomized multicenter study of sequential cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma stage 3B and 4A". Cancer, 1996, 77(11), 2371.

[41] Leborgne F., Leborgne J. H., Doldan R., Zubizarreta E., Ortega B., Maisonneuve J. et al.: "Induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy of advanced cancer of the cervix: a pilot study and phase III randomized trial". Internal. J. Rad. Oneal., Biol., Physics, 1997, 37(2), 343.

[42] Thomas G., Dembo A., Ackerman I., Franssen E., Balogh J., Fyles A., Levin: "A randomized trial of standard versus partially hyperfractionated radiation with or without concurrent 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced cervical cancer". Gynecol. Oneal., 1998, 69 (2), 137.

[43] Tseng C. J., Chang C. T., Lai C. H., Soong Y. K., Hong J. H., Tang S. G., Hsueh S.: "A randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix". Gynecol. Oneal., 1997, 66 (1), 52.

[44] Wong L. C., Choo Y. C., Choy D., Sham J. S., Ma H. K.: "Longterm follow-up of potentiation of radiotherapy by cis-platinum in advanced cervical cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 35 (2), 159.

[45] Overgaard J., Bentzen S. M., Kolstad P., Kjoerstad K., Davy M., Bertelsen K. et al.: "Misonidazole combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix". Internal. J. Rad. Oncol., Biol., Physics, 1989, 16 (4), 1069.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top