Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Surgical Stage III endometrial cancer: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Hospitals, Ankara, Turkey
*Corresponding Author(s): A. Ayhan E-mail:
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival estimates of stage III endometrial cancer patients, and also to detect the prognostic factors and failure patterns.
Materials and methods: Sixty-eight surgical Stage III endometrial cancer patients treated at Hacettepe University Hospital were included. All patients underwent surgical staging procedures consisting of peritoneal cytology, infracolic omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete pelvic-paraaortic lymphadenectomy. By surgical staging 26 (38%) patients had Stage IIIA and 42 (62%) patients had Stage IIIC disease. The mean resected lymph node number was 26 (median, 25; range, 15-58).
Results: The median age was 60 years (range, 38-77), and the median follow-up period was 62 months (range, 36-90 months). The 5-year disease free survival rate was 58% and the 5-year overall survival rate was 64%. These figures for Stage IIIA were 60% and 68%, respectively; and for Stage IIIC they were 57% and 62%, respectively. No significant survival difference was detected between Stage IIIA and IIIC (p = 0.60 for disease-free survival and p = 0.48 for overall survival). High grade and positive peritoneal cytology predicted poor survival in both univariate (p = 0.004 and p = 0.006, respectively) and multivariate (p = 0.05 and p = 0.04, respectively) analysis. Twenty-eight patients (41%) had recurrence with a median time of 23 months (range, 10-54 months). Nine patients (13%) had only local, 13 patients (19%) had only distant and six patients (9%) had both local and distant relapse.
Conclusion: Surgical staging is important in the management of Stage III endometrial cancer, and the main problem is still distant failure. In multivariate analysis high grade and positive peritoneal cytology predicted poor survival significantly.
Stage III endometrial cancer; Survival; Prognostic factors; Failure patterns
A. Ayhan,C. Taskiran,C. Cehk,T. Aksu,K. Yuce. Surgical Stage III endometrial cancer: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2002. 23(6);553-556.
[1] Creasman W., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P.. Benedet J., Shepherd J., Sideri M.: "Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer". J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 1998, 3, 35.
[2] Aalders J. G., Abeler V., Kolstad P.: "Clinical (stage III) as compared to subclinical intrapelvic tumor spread in endometrial carcinoma: a clinical and histopathologic study of 175 patients". Gynecol. Oneal., 1984, 17, 64.
[3] Mackillop W. J., Pringle J. F.: "Stage III endometrial carcinoma" Cancer, 1985, 56, 2519.
[4] Greven K. M.,L anciano R. M.,C orn B.,C ase D., Randall M.E .: "Pathologic stage III endometrial carcinoma". Cancer, 1993, 71, 3697.
[5] Schorge J. O.,M olpus K. L.,G oodman A.,N ikrui N.,F uller A. F.: "The effect of postsurgical therapy on stage III endometrial carcinoma". Gynecol. Oneal., 1996, 63, 34.
[6] Burke T. W., Gershenson D. M.、Morris M., Stringer C. A., Levenback C., Totolero-Luna G., Baker V. V.: "Postoperative adjuvant cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) chemotherapy in women with high-risk endometrial carcinoma". Gynecol. Oneal., 1994, 55, 47.
[7] Aoki Y., Kase H., Watanabe M., Sato T., Kurata H., Tanaka K.: "Stage III endometrial cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors and failure patterns after adjuvant chemotherapy". Gynecol. Oneal., 2001, 83 (1), 1.
[8] Onda T., Yoshikawa H., Mizutani K., Mishima M., Yokota H., Nagano H., et al.: "Treatment of node-positive endometrial cancer with complete node dissection, chemotherapy and radiation therapy". Br. J. Cancer, 1997, 75 (12), 1836.
[9] Nelson G., Randall M., Sutton G., Moore D., Hurteau J., Look K.: "FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: Analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy". Gynecol. Oneal., 1999, 75, 211.
[10] McMeekin D. S., Lashbrook D., Gold M., Johnson G., Walker J L., Manuel R.: "Analysis of FIGO stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients". Gynecol. Oneal., 2001, 81, 273.
[11] Grigsby P. W., Perez C. A., Kuske R. R., Kao M. S., Galakatos A E.: "Results of therapy, analysis of failures, and prognostic factors for clinical and pathologic stage Ill adenocarcinoma of the endometrium". Gynecol. Oneal., 1987, 27, 44.
[12] Hirahatake K.,H areyama H., Sakuragi N.,N ishiya M., Makinoda S., Fujimoto S.: "A clinical and pathologic study on para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma". J. Surg. Oneal., 1997, 65 (2), 82.
[13] Morrow C. P., Bundy B. N., Kurman R. J., Creasman W. T., Heller P., Homesley H. D., Graham J.E.: "Relationship between surgical pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study". Gynecol. Oncol.,1991, 40, 55.
[14] Katz LA., Andrews S. J., Fanning J.: "Survival at'ler multimodality treatment for stage lllC endometrial cancer". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 184, 1071.
[15] Rose P. G., Cha S. D., Tak W. K., Fitzgerald T., Reale F., Hunter R. E.: "Radiation therapy for surgically proven para-aortic node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma". Int. J. Radial. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1992, 24, 229.
[16] Hicks M. L., Piver M. S., Puretz J. L., Hempling R. E., Baker T R., Mcauley M., Walsh D. L.: "Survival in patients with paraaortic lymph node metastases from endometrial adenocarcinoma clinically limited to the uterus". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1993, 26, 607.
[17] Potish R. A.: "Abdominal radiotherapy for cancer of the utenne cervix and endometrium". Int. J. Radiat. Oneal. Biol. Phys., 1989, 16, 1453.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top