Article Data

  • Views 180
  • Dowloads 131

Original Research

Open Access

Have patients with early squamous carcinoma of the vulva been overtreated in the past? The Norwegian experience 1977-1991

  • M. SCHEISTR0EN1,*,
  • J.M. Nesland1
  • C. Trope1

1Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20020293 Vol.23,Issue 2,March 2002 pp.93-103

Published: 10 March 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): M. SCHEISTR0EN E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate different surgical approaches in early squamous vulvar cancer.

Methods: Review of clinical and histopathologic data and follow-up information of 216 patients with clinical FIGO stage I-II disease, primarily treated by surgery from 1977-1991.

Results: Eighty-nine patients underwent radical vulvectomy with bilateral groin dissection by en bloc excision, 60 by the triple incision technique, 20 individualized vulvar surgery with uni-or bilateral groin dissection, and 47 vulvar surgery only. Groin metastases occurred in 9% stage I and 25% stage II disease. Groin involvement was not seen in stage I tumors with invasion depth < or =/=1 mm. Bilateral metastases occurred in medially located tumors of both stages, and laterally located stage II. Metastases were ipsilateral in lateral stage 1. Separate groin dissection significantly reduced morbidity. Sixty-six patients relapsed, 14 after more than 5 years. Vulvar recurrence was related to tumor diameter and the condition of the resection borders. The single most important predictor of death from vulvar cancer was the presence of inguinal femoral lymph node metastases. Conservative and individualized surgery did not compromise 5-year survival.

Conclusions: A careful selection of patients fitted for less radical surgery is essential to avoid undertreatment. Groin dissection can be omitted in tumors with diameters < or =/=2 cm and invasion depth < or =/=1 mm. At least ipsilateral groin dissection is needed in all other cases. Groin dissection should be performed through separate incisions. Modified vulvectomy is appropriate provided radicality can be obtained. Long-time follow-up is important as recurrences can be seen many years after primary therapy.

Keywords

Squamous carcinoma; vulva


Cite and Share

M. SCHEISTR0EN,J.M. Nesland,C. Trope. Have patients with early squamous carcinoma of the vulva been overtreated in the past? The Norwegian experience 1977-1991. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2002. 23(2);93-103.

References

[1] Taussig F. J.: "Cancer of the vulva. An analysis of 155 cases (1911-1940)". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1949, 40, 764.

[2] Way S.: "Carcinoma of the vulva". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1960, 79, 692.

[3] Andersen B. L., Hacker N. F.: "Psychological adjustment after vulvar surgery". Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 62, 457.

[4] DiSaia P. J., Creasman W. T., Rich W. M.: "An alternate approach to early cancer of the vulva". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1979, 133, 825.

[5] Hacker N. F., Leuchter R. S., Berek J. S. et al.: "Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through separate groin incisions". Obstet. Gynecol., 1981, 63, 155.

[6] Iversen T., Abeler V., Aalders J.G.: "Individualized treatment of stage I carcinoma of the vulva". Obstet. Gynecol., 1981, 57, 85.

[7] Burell M.O., Franklin E.W., Campion M.J. et al.: "The modified radical vulvectomy with groin dissection: An eight year experience". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1988, 159, 715.

[8] Stehman F. B., Bundy B. N., Dvoretsky P. M. et al.: "Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: A prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group". Obstet. gynecol., 1992, 79, 490.

[9] Farias-Eisner R., Cirisano F. D., Grouse D. et al.: "Conservative and individualized surgery for early squamous carcinoma of the vulva: The treatment of choice for Stage I and II ( Tl-2 N0-1 MO) disease". Gynecol. Oneal., 1994, 53, 55.

[10] Burke T. W., Levenback C., Coleman R. L. et al.: "Surgical therapy of T l and T2 vulvar carcinoma: Further experience with radical wide excision and selective inguinal lymphadenectomy". Gynecol. Oneal., 1995, 57, 215.

[11] Rodriguez M., Sevin B.-U., Averette H.E. et al.: "Conservative trends in the surgical management of vulvar cancer: a University of Miami patient care evaluation study". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1997, 7, 151.

[12] Ansink A. C., Sie-Go D. M. D., van der Velden J. et al.: "Identification of sentinel nodes in vulvar carcinoma patients with the aid of a patent blue V injection". Cancer, 1999, 86, 652.

[13] Terada K.Y., Shimizu D. M., Wong J. H.: "Sentinel node dissection and ultrastaging in squamous cell cancer of the vulva". Gynecol. Oneal., 2000, 76, 40.

[14] De Cicco C., Sideri M., Bartolomei M. et al.: "Sentinel node biopsy in early vulvar cancer". Br. J. Cancer 2000, 82, 295.

[15] DeHullu J. A., Hollema H., Piers D. A. et al.: "Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva". J. Clin. Oneal., 2000, 15, 2811.

[16] The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics: "Classification and staging of malignant tumors in the female pelvis". Acta Obstet. Gynec. Scand., 1971, 50, 1.

[17] Sheperd J. H.: "Cervical and vulva cancer: changes in FIGO definitions of staging". Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 103, 405.

[18] Kaplan E. L., Meier P. : "Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations". J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1958, 53, 457.

[19] Tarone R. E., Ware J.: "On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions". Biometrika, 1977, 64, 156.

[20] Helm C. W., Hatch K., Austin J.M. et al.: "A matched comparison of single and triple incision technique for the surgical treatment of carcinoma of the vulva". Gynecol. Oneal., 1992, 46, 150.

[21] Grimshaw R. N., Murdoch J. B., Monaghan J.M.: "Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy through separate incisions - experience with 100 cases". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer., 1993, 3, 18.

[22] Siller B. S., Alvarez R. D., Conner W. D. et al.: "T2/T3 vulva cancer: A case-control study of triple incision versus en bloc radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. Gynecol. Oneal., 1995, 57, 335.

[23] Schulz M. J.,Penalver M. : “Recurrent vulvar carcinoma in the intervening tissue b!,idge in early invasive stage I disease treated by radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin node dissection through separate incisions". Gynecol. Oneal., 1989, 35, 383.

[24] Magrina M. D., Gonzalesz-Bosquet, Wever A. L. et al.: "Primary squamous cell cancer of the vulva: radical versus modified radical vulvar surgery". Gynecol. Oncology., 1998, 71, 116.

[25] Iversen T.: "The value of groin palpation in epidermoid carcinoma of the vulva". Gynecol. Oneal., 1981, 12, 291.

[26] Homesley Howard D.: "Management of V ulvar Cancer". Cancer, 1995, 76 (Suppl 10), 2159.

[27] Hacker N. F., Berek J. S., Lagasse L. D. et al.: "Management of regional lymph nodes and their prognostic influence in vulvar cancer". Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 61, 408.

[28] Homesley H. D., Bundy B. N., Sedlis A. et al.: "Prognostic factors for groin node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)". Gynecol. Oneal., 1993, 49, 279.

[29] Hacker N. F., Berek J. S., Lagasse L. D. et al.: "Individualization of treatment for stage I squamous cell vulvar carcinoma". Obstet. Gynecol., 1984, 63, 155.

[30] Binder S. W., Huang I.: "Risk factors for the development of lymph node metastasis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma". Gynecol. Oneal., 1990, 37, 9.

[31] Kelley J. L., Burke T. W., Tomos C. et al.: "Minimally invasive vulvar carcinoma: An indication for conservative surgical therapy". Gynecol. Oneal., 1992, 44, 240.

[32] Hacker N. F., Van der Velden J.: "Conservative management of early vulvar cancer". Cancer, 1993, 71 (Suppl 4), 1673.

[33] Iversen T., Aas M.: "The lymph drainage from the vulva". Gynecol. Oneal., 1983, 16, 179.

[34] Borgno G., Micheletti L., Barbero M. et al.: "Topographic distribution of groin lymph nodes. A study of 50 female cadavers". J. Reprod. Med., 1990, 35, 1127.

[35] Niclin J. L., Hacker N. F., Heintze S. W. et al.: "An anatomical study of inguinal lymph node topography and clinical implications for the surgical management of vulva cancer". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1995, 5, 128.

[36] Hacker N. F., Nieberg R. K., Berek J.: "Superficially invasive vulvar cancer with nodal metastases". Gynecol. Oneal., 1983, 15, 65.

[37] Levenback C., Morris M., Burke T. W. et al.: "Groin dissection practices among gynecologic oncologists treating early vulvar cancer". Gynecol. Oneal., 1996, 62, 73.

[38] Levenback C., Bruke T. W., Gershenson D. et al.: "Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer". Obstet. Gynecol. 1994, 84, 163.

[39] Stehman F., Bundy B., Bell J. et al.: "Groin dissection versus groin radiation in carcinoma of the vulva: A Gynecology Oncology Group Study". Int. J. Radiat. One. Biol. Phys. 1992, 24, 389.

[40] Origoni M., Sideri M., Garsia S. et al.: "Prognostic value of pathological patterns of lymph node positivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva Stage III and IVa FIGO". Gyncol. Oneal., 1992, 45, 313.

[41] Morgan M. K., Mikuta J. J.: "Surgical management of vulvar cancer". Seminars Surg. Oncology, 1999, 17, 168.

[42] Van der Velden K.: "Some Apects of the Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the vulva". PhD Thesis, Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht, 1996.

[43] Homsley H., Bundy B., Sedlis A. et al.: "A Randomized study of irradiation therapy versus pelvic node resection for patients with groin nodes (a Gynecology Oncology Group Study)". Obstet. Gynecol., 1986, 86, 733.

[44] Michael S., Green M. D, Wendel R. et al.: "Sexual dysfunction following vulvectomy". Gyncol. Oncol o g y , 2000, 77, 73.

[45] Hopkins M. P., Reid G. C., Morley G. W.: "The surgical management of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva". Obstet. Gynecol., 1990, 75, 1001.

[46] Podratz K. C., Symmonds R. E., Taylor W. F.: "Carcinoma of the vulva: analysis of treatment failures". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 143, 340.

[47] Piura B., Masotina A., Murdoch J. et al.: "Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A study of 73 cases". Gynecol. Oncol., 1993, 48, 189.

[48] Miller B., Morris M., Levenback C. et al.: "Pelvic exentration for primary and recurrent vulvar cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 58, 189.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top