Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Preoperative imaging of primary intra-abdominal gynaecological malignancies. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-scan and MRI. A Greek cohort study
1Department of Gynaecology, Greece
2Department of Biostatistics, Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
*Corresponding Author(s): G. Vorgias E-mail:
Objectives: To determine the radiological modalities that provide at the initial workout the most accurate information regarding the operability and the type of operation for patients with primary cervical, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas.
Patients and methods: The medical records of 611 patients with gynaecological cancer were reviewed. The preoperative radiological findings were compared with the intraoperative and pathological ones. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI at various sites was evaluated for all three kinds of carcinoma in combination.
Results: MRI was more accurate than CT in determining cervical enlargement (82% vs 73%), parametrial invasion (91% vs 74%) and the only examination that could evaluate cervical tumour size as well as cervical stromal and myometrial infiltration. Regarding lymph node involvement their results were similar (86% vs 88%). Both methods were comparably accurate in evaluating ovarian tumours (82% vs 84%), ascites (82% vs 81%), omental (73% vs 77%) and mesenterial infiltration (88% vs 93%). They also proved to be highly accurate (100% vs 98%) in the evaluation of solid abdominal organs.
Conclusions: Non-enchanced MRI should only be used for the preoperative evaluation of a patient with cervical carcinoma, while CT with intravenous and per os contrast media for one with ovarian cancer. Regarding patients with endometrial cancer, no high-resolution method is required for endometrioid grade I tumours, while contrast-enchanced MRI should be employed for all other cases.
CT-scan; MRI; Preoperative evaluation; Cervical; Endometrial; Ovarian carcinoma
G. Vorgias,M. Katsoulis,K. Argyrou,J. Tsiaousi,V. Paleogianni,B. Dertimas,T. Akrivos. Preoperative imaging of primary intra-abdominal gynaecological malignancies. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-scan and MRI. A Greek cohort study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2002. 23(2);139-144.
[1] Benedet L. J., Bender H., Jones H. III, Ngan H. Y. S., Pecorelli S.: "FIGO staging classifications and practical guidelines in the management of gynaecologic cancers". Int. J. Gynaecol. Ostet., 2000, 70, 209.
[2] Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K. K., Segal M. R., Lu Y., Powell C. B., Hricak H.: "Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis". Radiology, 1999, 212, 711.
[3] Subak L. L., Hricak H., Powell C. B., Azizi L., Stern J. L.: "Cervical carcinoma: Computed tomography nad magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging". Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995, 86(1), 43.
[4] Lagasse L. D., Creasman W. T., Shingleton H. M., Blessing J. A.: "Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: Experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group". Gynecol. Oncol., 1980, 9, 90.
[5] Lorenzen M.: "The value of MRI in staging gynecologic tumours". Aktuel/e Radio/., 1996, 6(2), 63.
[6] Lorenzen M., Braun J., Gehrckens A., Nicolas V.: "Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies". Aktuel/e Radiol., 1998, 8(6), 266.
[7] Hricak H., Quivey J. M. , Campos Z. et al: "Carcinoma of the cervix: Predictive value of clinical and MR imaging assessment of prognostic factors". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1993, 27, 791.
[8] Walsh J. W.: "Computed tomography of gynecological neoplasms". Radiol. Clin. North. Am., 1992, 30, 817.
[9] Kim S. H., Choi B. I., Han J. K. et al: "Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: Comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients". Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1993, 17, 633.
[10] Taieb S., Bonodeau F., Leblanc E., Vennin P., Fournier C., Besson P.: "Comparative study of tumor evaluation with computerized tomography and surgery in ovarian cancer". J. Radio/., 1998, 79(1), 27.
[11] Ivanov S.: "Transvaginal sonography, dilatation and curettage, computed tomography and hysteroscopy as methods for the diagnosis of the involvment of cervical canal in cases of endometrial carcinoma". Akush. Ginekol., 2000, 39(1), 37.
[12] Sheu M. H., Chang C. Y., Wang J. H., Yen M. S.: "Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging". Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei), 2000, 63(8), 634.
[13] Oellinger J. J., Blohmer J. U., Michniewicz K. et al: "Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results". Zentralbl. Gynakol., 2000, 122(2), 82.
[14] Scheidler J., Hricak H., Yu K. K., Subak L., Segal M. R.: "Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis". JAMA, 1997, 278, 1096.
[15] Sundborg M. J., Taylor R. R., Mark J., Elg S. A.: "Cystoscopy after computed tomography scan to identify bladder invasion in cervical cancer". Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998, 92(3), 364.
[16] Takahashi K., Yoshioka M., Kosuge H. et al: "The accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the extent of endometrial carcinima". Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 1995, 47, 647.
[17] Varpula M. J., Klemi P. J.: "Staging of uterine endometrial carcJnoma with ultra low-field (0,02 T) MRI: a comparative study with CT". J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1993, 17, 641.
[18] Kim S. H.,Kim H. D., Song Y. S., Kang S. B., Lee H. P.: "Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT, and MRI". J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1995, 19(5), 766.
[19] Morrow C. P., Curtin J.P., Townsend D. G.: "Tumors of the endometrium". In: Morrow C. P., Curtin J.P. (eds): "Synopsis of Gynecologic Oncology", 5'" edition, New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998, 151.
[20] Rubin S. C., Hoskins W. J., Saigo P. E. et al: "Management of endometrial adenocarcinoma with cervical involvement". Gynecol. Oncol., 1992, 45, 294.
[21] Buist M. R., Golding R. P., Burger C. W. et al: "Comparative evaluation of diagnostic methods in ovarian carcinoma with emphasis on CT and MRI". Gynecologic Oncology, 1994, 52, 191.
[22] Nelson P. E., Rosenfield A. T., Schwartz P. E.: "Preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomography prediction of optimal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma". J. Clin. Oncol., 1993, 11(1), 166.
[23] Forstner R., Hricak H., W hite S.: "CT and MRI of ovarian cancer". Abdom. Imaging, 1995, 20(1), 2.
[24] Sugiyuarna T., Nishida T., Ushijima K. et al: "Detection of lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma and uterine corpus carcinoma by preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging". J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1995, 21(6), 551.
[25] Troiano R. N., Quedens C. C., Taylor K. J.: "Correlation of findings on transvaginal sonography with serum CA 125 levels". Am. J. Roentgenol., 1997, 168(6), 1587.
[26] Tempany C. M., Zou K. H., Silverman S. G., Brown D. L., Kurtz A. B., McNeil B. J.: "Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities; report from the Radiological Oncology Group". Radiology, 2000, 215(3), 761.
Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
Google Scholar
JournalSeek
Top