Article Data

  • Views 170
  • Dowloads 144

Original Research

Open Access

Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III): Endo-Gia 30 stapler versus traditional forcipressure for resection of the cardinal ligament

  • P. Scollo1,*,
  • G. Scibilia1
  • F. Nocera1
  • R. Ruggeri1
  • S. Caudullo1

1Department of Obstetric-Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200106423 Vol.22,Issue 6,November 2001 pp.423-426

Published: 10 November 2001

*Corresponding Author(s): P. Scollo E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: Morbidity and costs associated with Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III) are noteworthy. The Endo-Gia stapler method for resection of cardinal ligaments can reduce duration of surgery and hospitalization, blood loss, costs and postoperative infection rates.

Method: Two groups of patients (homogeneous for age, weight and medical condition) were studied: one group was operated on using the Endo-Gia stapler method (n=52) and the other with the traditional forcipressure (n=13). The size of parametrial tissue removed, blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, cost of materials and postoperative fever were compared in the two groups.

Result: Mean operative times were lower in the Endo-Stapler group than in the controls (mean 180 min versus 220 min). Mean blood loss was 300 cc in the stapler group versus 450 cc in the forcipressure group. Mean cost of surgery (considering costs of materials, hospital stay. duration of surgery), was lower in the stapler group (3,095 euros) than in the group who underwent traditional surgery (3,434 euros).

Conclusion: Our data suggest the Endo-Gia stapler method significantly reduces blood loss, operative time and cost.

Keywords

Cervical carcinoma, Endo-Gia stapler; Radical hysterectomy

Cite and Share

P. Scollo,G. Scibilia,F. Nocera,R. Ruggeri,S. Caudullo. Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III): Endo-Gia 30 stapler versus traditional forcipressure for resection of the cardinal ligament. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2001. 22(6);423-426.

References

[1] Burghardt E.: "Oncologia chirurgica ginecologica". CIC Edmom Internazionali, 1994.

[2] Deppe G. et al.: "Aortic node metastases with negative pelvic nodes in cervical cancer". Cancer, I 984, 53, 173.

[3] Body G., Calais G., Lefloch 0. et al.: "Cancro de! collo dell' utero". Vol. II 600, A, 10, EMC, Encyclopedie Medico Chirurgicale. Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, ESI Stampa Medica S.r.l

[4] Papp Z. et al.: "The role of radical abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy (Wertheim's operation) in contemporary gynecology". Orv. Hetil., 1989, 130(28), 1481.

[5] Fanning J., Hilgers R., Palabrica C.: "Surgical stapling techmque for radical hysterectomy". Gynecologic Oncology, 1994, 55, 179.

[6] Brewer C., Chan J., Kurosaki T. et al.: "Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler". Gynecologic Oncology, 1998, 71, 50.

[7] Patsner B.: "Radical abdominal hysterectomy using the Endo-Giastapler: report of 150 cases and literature review". 1. Gynaecol Oncol., 1998 - ISSN, 0932-2936 XIX, n. 3.

[8] Benedetti-Panici P., Scambia G., Baiocchi G. et al.: "Radical hysterectomy: a randomized study comparing two techniques for resection of the cardinal ligament". Gynecologic Oncology, 1993, 50, 226.

[9] Orr J. W. Jr. et al.: "Primary surgical treatment of mvasive cancer". "Cancer of the cervix". Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, 1995, 123.

[10] Spirtos N., Schlaerth J.B., Kimball R. E. et al.: "Laparoscoptc radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 174(6), 1763, discussion 1767.

[11] Rodriguez M., Method M. M., Averette H. E. et al.: "Endog,a stapler used in an alternative method of anterior abdominal resection and total pelvic exenteration: the University of Miami experience". J. Gynecol. Tech., 1996, 2, 109.

[12] Eisenkop S. M., Spirtos N., Montag T. et al.: "The clinical signtficance of blood transfusion at the time of radical hysterectomy". Obstet. Gynecol., 1990, 76, 110.

[13] Vidal O., Garza Leal J. G.: "Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy". J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1996, 3 (4 Supplement), S53.

[14] Kim D. H., Moon J. S.: "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early, invasive cervical carcinoma" J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1998, 5(4), 411

[15] Hsieh Y. Y., Lyn W. C., Chang C. C. et al.: "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic, sub-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results of short-term follow-up". J. Reprod. Med., 1998, 43(6), 528.

[16] Kim D. H.: "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy". J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 1995, 2 (4 Supplement), S22.

[17] Sedlacek T. V., Campion M., Reicb H. et al.: "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a feasibility study". Presented at the 26'" Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologist, San Francisco, CA, February 1995, 18.

[18] Querleu D.: "Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer". Obstet. Gynecol., 1974, 44, 265.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top