Article Data

  • Views 210
  • Dowloads 110

Original Research

Open Access

The benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for obstetrics and gynecology residents

  • D.S. Chi1,*,
  • W. B. Jones1
  • R.R. Barakat1
  • K. N. O'Keefe1
  • W. J. Hoskins1
  • J. L. Lewis Jr1

1Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200104266 Vol.22,Issue 4,July 2001 pp.266-268

Published: 10 July 2001

*Corresponding Author(s): D.S. Chi E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: To assess the benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents.

Methods: We reviewed our housestaff records from July 1992 to June 1998 and the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) subspeciality match results for gynecologic oncology from its inception in 1994 to 1999.

Results: From July 1992 to June 1998, a total of 146 residents participated in our elective program. Of the 104 candidates who went through our program and subsequently participated in the NRMP, 55 (53%) obtained match positions. After completion of the elective, 42 of the 146 residents (29%) did not participate in the NRMP for gynecologic oncology and therefore were not eligible to obtain match appointments. During the study period, there were 255 other residents in the United States who applied for gynecologic oncology fellowship positions through the NRMP and did not participate in our program. Of these 255 candidates, 137 (54%) matched.

Conclusion: The percentage of residents who went through our program, participated in the NRMP, and obtained fellowships did not differ significantly from the percentage of residents who matched without participating in the program. However, almost one-third of the residents who went through our program did not participate in the NRMP. The reasons for their lack of participation were not formally evaluated, but are likely related to a personal decision to pursue another carrer pathway, a decision facilitiated by their experience in our program. Therefore, it appears that the main benefits of the program are to help potential candidates decide whether or not to pursue a career in gyencologic oncology and to aid fellowship programs in identifying exceptional candidates for subspecialty training.

Keywords

Gynecologic Oncology; Subspeciality training; Resident

Cite and Share

D.S. Chi,W. B. Jones,R.R. Barakat,K. N. O'Keefe,W. J. Hoskins,J. L. Lewis Jr. The benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for obstetrics and gynecology residents. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2001. 22(4);266-268.

References

[1] Mullin F. J.: "A proposal for supplementing the cooperative plan for appointment of interns". J. Assoc. Am. Med. Colleges, 1950, 25, 437.

[2] Rooth A. E.: "The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory". J. Polit. Econ. 1984, 92, 991.

[3] Williams K. J.: "A reexamination of the NRMP matching algorithm". Acad. Med., 1995, 70, 470.

[4] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1994 Appointments.

[5] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1995 Appointments.

[6] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1996 Appointments.

[7] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1997 Appointments.

[8] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1998 Appointments

[9] National Resident Matching Program. Obstetrics & Gynecology Fellowship 1999 Appointments.

[10] Zar J. H.: "Biostatistical Analsysis". Englewood Cliffs. N. J. Prentice Hall, 1974.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top