Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer

Objective: The aim of this work was to examine three types of radical vaginal hysterectomy with different degrees of radicality, performed in order to reduce surgical complications and sequelae in different indications, and to test the feasibility of a new simple and quick technique for extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy to be used in combination with radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of cervical cancer. In this way the advantages of vaginal surgery (e.g.: unnecessary general anaesthesia, reduced surgical trauma, applicability to obese and poor surgical risk patients, fast time-saving procedure) can be preserved.

Methods: We compared retrospectively the long-term results of radical vaginal and radical abdominal operations in a large series of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients treated at our institution in Florence from 1968 to 1983. Furthermore, we analysed the results of our experience from 1995 to 1998, when we performed extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by radical vaginal hysterectomy, on 48 patients affected by cervical cancer. Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed through two small abdominal incisions (6-7 cm). Twenty-two patients (45%) were obese (BMI>30 kg/m2) and 20 were poor surgical risks. FIGO stage was: IB1 in 18 cases, IB2 in eight, IIA in six, IIB in 12, IIIB in four. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 12 cases and preoperative irradiation was given in ten. General and regional anaesthesia were used in 30 (62.5%) and in 18 (37.5%) cases, respectively.

Results: As for past experience, in stage IB the five-year survival of 356 patients who underwent radical vaginal hysterectomy and that of 288 who had radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy were 81% and 75%, respectively (p<0.05). Surgical complications were fewer with no mortality in the first group. In stage IIA, survival rates were 68% for radical vaginal hysterectomy and 64% for radical abdominal hysterectomy, in 76 and 64 cases, respectively (p=n.s.). As for the more recent experience, median operative time for extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy was 20 minutes for each side (range 15-36). In each patient a median of 26 lymph nodes were removed (range 16-48). Positive nodes were found in 12 cases (25%). Median operative time for radical vaginal hysterectomy was 40 minutes (range 30-65). Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy complications included: lymphocyst, five cases (10%) and retroperitoneal hematoma, one (2%); all occurred at the beginning of the experience. Radical vaginal hysterectomy complications included: ureteral stenosis, one (2%) and uretero-vaginal fistula, one (2%). All complications occurred in patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy preoperatively. Median hospital stay was ten days (range 6-20).

Conclusions: The results of our work demonstrate that our technique for extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy shows a good applicability to cervical cancer patients submitted to radical vaginal hysterectomy, which has a high rate of cure for stage IB and IIA as shown by our past experience. The procedure of extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy was quick, easy, and safe, and its realization was not detrimental to the advantages of radical vaginal hysterectomy. Our experience supports the continued use of this combined extraperitoneal and vaginal approach in the treatment of cervical cancer. Moreover, the three classes of radical vaginal hysterectomy allow tailoring the type of the operation to the clinical and physical characteristics of the patients.

Radical vaginal hysterectomy; Cervical cancer; Surgical treatment; Lymphadenectomy

[1] Schuchardt K.: "Eine neue Mcthode der Gebtirmutterexstirpation" Zentralbl Chir, 1893, 20, 1121.

[2] Schauta F.: "Die Operation des Gebarmutterkrebses mittels des Schuchardtschen Paravaginalschnittes". Mschr Geburtshilfe Gynakol, 1902, 15, 133.

[3] Wertheim E.: "The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases)". Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1912, 66, 169.

[4] Amreich 1.: "Zur Anatomie und Technik der erweitcrten vaginalen Carcinomoperation". Arch Gynakol, 1924, 122, 497.

[5] Meigs J. V.: "T he Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix". Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1945, 40, 542.

[6] Ingiulla W.: "Five-year result、of 327 Schauta-Amreich operations for cervical carcinoma". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1966, 96, 188.

[7] Navratil E.:''Indications and results of the Schauta-Amreich operation with and without postoperative roentgen treatment in epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix of the uterus". Am .I Obstet Gynecol, 1963, 86, 141.

[8] van Bouwdijk B.:'Treatment of cancer of the cervix uteri". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1956, 72, 100.

[9] McCall M. L.: "A modern evaluation of the radical vaginal operation for carcinoma of the cervix". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1963, 85, 295.

[10] Mitra S.: "Extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy and radical vaginal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix (Mitra technique)". Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1958, 78, 191.

[11] Nathanson I. T.: "Extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of cancer of the cervix". In: "Progress in Gynaecology". Meigs J. V., Sturgis S. H. Eds. Grunn & Stratton, New York 1950.

[12] De Graaf J.:'The Mitra-Schauta operation in combination with preoperative irradiation as treatment for carcinoma of the cervix". Gynecol Oncol, 1980, 10, 267.

[13] Dargent D.: "A new future for Schauta's operation through presurgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy". Eur.I Gynecol Oncol, 1987, 8, 292.

[14] Qucrleu D., Leblanc E., Castellani B.: "Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix". Am.I Ohstet Gynecol, 1991, 164, 579.

[15] Childers J. M., Hatch K., Surwit E. A.: "The role of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the management of cervical carcinoma" Gynecol Oncol, 1992, 47, 38.

[16] Massi G. B.: "La linfoadenectomia extraperitoneale nell'approccio chirurgico vaginale alle ncoplasie uterine". Riv Ostet Ginecol, 1995, 11, 51.

[17] Massi G. B., Savino L., Susini T.:'Three classes of radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175, 1576.

[18J Piver M. S., Rutledge F., Smith J. P.: "Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer". Obstet Gynecol, 1974, 44, 265

[19] Massi G. B., Savino L., Susini T.: "Schauta-Amreich vaginal hysterectomy and Wertheim-Meigs abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 168, 928.

[20] Massi G. B., Savino L., Susini T.: "Vaginal hysterectomy versus abddominal hysterectomy for the treatment of stage I endometrial carcinoma". Am.I Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 174, 1320.

[21] Gasparri F., Massi G. B.: ·'Isterectomie radicali per via vaginale" In: Trattato italiano di Ginecologia. Dallepiane G., Maurizio E., Tesauro G. Eds. PEM, Rome 1979, 327.