Article Data

  • Views 257
  • Dowloads 110

Original Research

Open Access

Glandular abnormalities on cervical smear: a study to compare the accuracy of cytological diagnosis with underlying pathology

  • R. J. Gornall1
  • N. Singh 2,*,
  • W. Noble1
  • I. E. Boyd2
  • A. Hitchcock2

1Princess Anne Hospital, UK

2Southampton General Hospital, UK

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20000149 Vol.21,Issue 1,January 2000 pp.49-52

Published: 10 January 2000

*Corresponding Author(s): N. Singh E-mail:

Abstract

The interpretation of glandular abnormalities detected by cervical smear provides a diagnostic dilemma. This study aims to compare the accuracy of cytological diagnosis with underlying pathology so that guidelines for the investigation and management of abnormal glandular smears may be formulated. A retrospective review of 150 women with glandular abnormalities reported on cervical smear collected over 12 months from 1996 in a University hospital was performed. Smears were graded by the initial report into 3 groups, dependent on the severity of abnormality. Investigation, treatment and subsequent 3-year follow-up were recorded. The accuracy of prediction for a significant neoplastic or preneoplastic glandular pathology only was 0% with mild, 9% (3/35) with moderate, and 24% (9/38) with severe abnormalities. When squamous lesions were included, the chance of finding any dysplastic squamous or glandular abnormality was 16% (12/77), 51% (18/35) and 82% (31/38), respectively, following a smear showing a suspected glandular abnormality only. Our results highlight the poor specificity of predicting glandular neoplasia or preneoplasia from cervical smears, with a final diagnosis of high grade CIN in 35% (17/49) of patients with dyskaryotic glandular cytological changes only and 83% (20/24) where concomitant squamous dyskaryosis was reported. The reporting of reactive or minor changes in endocervical cells was of no diagnostic value. Management protocols for moderate and severe glandular abnormalities should include visualisation and biopsy of the uterine cavity to exclude endometrial neoplasia.

Cite and Share

R. J. Gornall,N. Singh ,W. Noble,I. E. Boyd,A. Hitchcock. Glandular abnormalities on cervical smear: a study to compare the accuracy of cytological diagnosis with underlying pathology. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2000. 21(1);49-52.

References

[1] Wilbur D. C.: "Endocervical glandular atypia: a new problem for the cytologist". Diagn. Cytopathol., 1995, 13,463.

[2] Van Aspert-van Erp A. J. M., Bepvan't Hof-Grootenboer A., Brugal G.,V ooijs G. P.: "Endocervical columnar cell intraepithelial neoplasia: I discriminating cytomorphologic criteria". Acta Cytol., 1995, 39, 1199.

[3] Lee K. R., Manna E. A., St. John T.: "Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytological diagnosis". Diagn. Cytopathol.,1995,13, 202.

[4] DiTomasso J. P., Ibrahim R., Dina R. M.: "Glandular lesions of the cervix: validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma". Acta Cytologica , 1996, 40(6), 1127.

[5] Jackson S. R.,H ollingworth T. A., Anderson M. C., Johnson J.,H ammond R.H.: "Glandular lesions of the cervix - cytological and histological correlation". Cytopathology, 1996, 7, 10.

[6] Contreras-Melendez L.,H erbert A.,M illward Sadler G.H ., Moore I. E.,M asson G. M. et al.: "Assessment of the accuracy of cytology in women referred for colposcopy and biopsy: the results of a 1 year audit". Cytopatholog, 1992, 3, 267.

[7] Bertrand M., Lickrish G. M., Colgan T. J.: "The anatomic distribution of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ; implications for treatment". Am. J. Gynecol., 1987, 157, 21.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top